Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[WhatIsIt]

Just as you I've been following Floyd Sweet's work.

One of my coils radiates very strongly with very little input.
I don't know what is it yet, but it is messing with electronics in vicinity.
I took advice from my friend and Nelson, not to expose myself, but only for short periods of time.
All electronic around is affected.

My bucking fields loves short bursts.

My thought is (tied to Floyd's work) :
Can clashing of fields may disrupt permanent magnet field just for a moment,
and when it comes back, can it induce current in that same coils with same power or more?

Like switching permanent magnet field with bursts of bucking fields.
Did not tried this yet, but it came to me this morning reading all of this posts.

I know you are also deep in Floyd's work, that's why I am writing this.

Can bucking fields be used to push away permanent magnet field?
Did you ever thought about this?

Looking at Floyd's designs it seems that he is using same coils for input and output,
which implies what I wrote above.
Of course, it is just thought along with the morning coffee.

[EMJunkie]

@Whatisit,

It is easy to speculate on phenomena, I have done it in the past also, sometimes I still do. I have learned that speculation is very rarely helpful. Sometimes in fact it brings confusion. Confusion is difficult to deal with, its that area in between. No persons land. Much of the time confusion can send you backwards.

I try to stick with facts. Build a Map with Facts, then one can connect the Dots on the Map. This is not always easy to do! If one is able to get into this habit, then in the long run, its easier to make progress.

Identifying the Change in Current, thus the Magnetic Field, then Identifying the Coil Polarities vs the Right Hand Grip Rule, I have found this helpful.

Where ever there is Magnetic Field Change Between any Two Coils, there is individual Actions occurring.

   1: Primary Coil Power as an Action.
   2: The Secondary Coil sees the Primary Action and has its own Reaction.
   3: The Primary sees the Secondary Reaction and a Counter-Reaction occurs.


The Attached Image shows this below:

This works as a big Loop, its the Reactance, or Self Induction, BEMF, but really, the term should Back MMF. Perhaps I have over simplified this, however its an analogy.

Best wishes,
   Chris Sykes

[lancaIV]

Mr.Sykes,do you know about what kind of international/global  "Physics"-level we discuss ?




Germany : Max-Planck Institut fuer Festkoerperphysik,Dresden for example  https://www.ifw-dresden.de/de/ifw-institute/institute-for-theoretical-solid-state-physics/

Industrial level : western world (G7) GE,SIEMENS,HITACHI R&D  laboratories


Investor investment richdome grade : chinese gouvernment,Al-Fayed,Gates Foundation,et cet. ......










This so called "overunity"-effect ( output > input, but never output > device average nominal rated capacity) is by which known mechanism possible and what this gain is ?

                            atom reactor,hydrogen reactor,fission reactor ,fusion reactor ( developments for peace )



For this the interested people has to read and study ( doing own calculations and comparisons a. theoretical then practise : experiment model/prototype ) :   


https://overunity.com/2238/cheap-wind-farming/msg544460/#new           reply #5






For later development we can look for " coils bundle systems"                            https://contest.techbriefs.com/profile?user=29520


and look for

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=9&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19931012&CC=US&NR=5252176A&KC=A

A good question of this system is how a particle such as a photon traveling at the speed of light could be further accelerated as it passed through this crystal. The answer to that question could be that the crystal accelerator provides an energy gain from its strong nuclear forces to the particles which shows up as an increase of their effective mass. Another answer is that the energy law E=Mc@2 is changed when radiant energy units are subjected to certain forces such as the nuclear forces in the crystal. The speed of light is no longer limited and it conforms to the new equation E=McX. The value of X in the crystal approaches 3.times.10@20 meters per second.




Van der Waals,Casimir double plates, TMR-effect and this then in future based by Fullerene-foils devices,super-cooled ambient

https://books.google.pt/books?id=w_xpdFx0C4MC&pg=PA44&lpg=PA44&dq=speed+behaviour+nanotubes&source=bl&ots=wFRRwpFOeU&sig=ACfU3U2d8lt39pEBhoiM1jJGEfexXlpyPw&hl=de&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiEudyV0NjoAhWk4YUKHRZgDPAQ6AEwCXoECAgQAQ#v=onepage&q=speed%20behaviour%20nanotubes&f=false


only as short example from hundreds of studies during the last two decades : speed/velocity in (Carbon) Nano Tubes : "magnetoresistive effect ; electroresistive effect ?"


btw :




also #5 understandings related : Ampere force law






    for AC and pulsed DC electricity      ( V x Hz) x A      or  V x ( A x Hz)   ?                " gearbox and accelerator pedal " kinematic process ?


 AMPERE TURNS  google or other search machines or classical textbooks  : speed vs velocity scalar/vector




average velocity = minimum and maximum velocity let give "average"   


   DC line / AC line                          AC up            action            AC down              reaction                        energy and heat up  ?  energy and heat/cold ? down


   AC : positive and negative current  !        pulsed DC  ; positive and negative current ?






                                                                      Pulse Power calculation and measurement



https://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Communications-Mechanics%20/%20Electrodynamics/Download/1180


1 Wh as same as 3600 Ws only valid for "pure DC x A" for other electricity kinds : WRONG !

Time and his period is a important calculation factor ! Fermi-second to Astro-Light-second : DIFFERENCE ?


Often is "Time" hidden in a " physical cgs unit" : hidden for newbies !

Are you all up to date : since 2019 new " Ampere" definition by international convention !


#8734 :

The quote: "Little Steps for Little Feet" - Sir Richard Feynman. Floyd Sweets First VTA was reported to be 6 Watts, his last VTA, Generation Six, was over 5000 Watts. So keep expectations real! Don't let your expectations get out of the frame of reality. Aim for a few Watts initially. This is not a hard goal to achieve.


Let us take the VTA Generation 6 : 5000 W            a. power density ? W/Kg   and what is to read by Floyd Sweet papers about the output : DC or AC or pulsed DC ?!

[WhatIsIt]

@Whatisit,

It is easy to speculate on phenomena, I have done it in the past also, sometimes I still do. I have learned that speculation is very rarely helpful. Sometimes in fact it brings confusion. Confusion is difficult to deal with, its that area in between. No persons land. Much of the time confusion can send you backwards.

I try to stick with facts. Build a Map with Facts, then one can connect the Dots on the Map. This is not always easy to do! If one is able to get into this habit, then in the long run, its easier to make progress.

Identifying the Change in Current, thus the Magnetic Field, then Identifying the Coil Polarities vs the Right Hand Grip Rule, I have found this helpful.

Where ever there is Magnetic Field Change Between any Two Coils, there is individual Actions occurring.

   1: Primary Coil Power as an Action. 5kW
   2: The Secondary Coil sees 5kW the Primary Action and has its own Reaction.
   3: The Primary sees the Secondary Reaction and a Counter-Reaction occurs. Output 5kW
Standard transformer action.


The Attached Image shows this below:

This works as a big Loop, its the Reactance, or Self Induction, BEMF, but really, the term should Back MMF. Perhaps I have over simplified this, however its an analogy.

Best wishes,
   Chris Sykes

So, you know how Floyd device operates and for you it is nothing new,
or you speculate as well?

What is it from those two?

[EMJunkie]

@lancaIV

I have no response for you. I do not see what you are trying to get to. I do not understand your post. Is it a question or a statement?

Bets wishes,
   Chris Sykes