Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[WhatIsIt]

Hey Whatisit - I am always serious!

How does one dampen, or reduce Vibrations, the Sponge is one way! The Sponge was shown in the Image, VTA Gen 2.

What other methods might be used? What is a Vibration? How can a few Coils and Magnetic Fields Vibrate? What other Devices Vibrate when in operation?

It is clear from Evidence, Floyd Sweet solved the problem of excessive Vibrations in the VTA Generation 3.

You get what I am pointing to now?

This is one example of using Facts to gather Information to assist in further understanding of a machine.

You keep bring up the word: "enemy" why? Perhaps best to focus and concentrate on the topic at hand.

I would prefer focused and concerted effort on the Evidence and the topic at hand.

Best wishes,
   Chris Sykes

The only fact here is that you don't know how Floyd's device operates!
Lot's of speculations based on your experiments, but beyond that nothing.
I did experiments you suggested.

[EMJunkie]

I shake my head, looking at the intelligence of some, and wonder how some manage to get themselves out of bed in the morning - Isn't it sad!

Looks like one of our trolls is back under another name. Disgruntled Trolls are like ClingOn's you just cant get rid of them.

While one or two come to create trouble, many thousands read and learn simple Facts that are provable. Public Exposure is massive, greater than ever before! I hope the Readers appreciated my little joke!

Come, Be Part of Something Better: http://www.aboveunity.com/ - Trolls 100% Eliminated! We have made progress like you would never believe! We are Light Years Ahead!

Best wishes,
   Chris Sykes

[lancaIV]

Partnered output coils,but also combined double coils and capacitive windings is a low development level for a functional micro-grid system,autonomous or bypass/UPS use !

We need as consumer a " moderated electric grid/network" and this as " partnered output system":source output and load output : +- 1:1 ~ ON DEMAND UNITY


The velocity/speed moderator in a car :

A. 5-/6. Gang - Getriebe/transmission,differential

B. High sophisticated ,heavier and more expensive : Automatik

                             Sonnen- and Planeten - Raeder Configuration

So how looks a portable/autonomous "mechanical" micro-/net-grid "Automatik" ? scheme !
Zu
How would it looked synthesized : electro-digital,as Eprom,quantum-mechanical Automatik ?!


Probably of interest : espacenet-archive  advanced search :

                                      Andreas Sumera ,Hamburg/Germany


https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=de&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=andreas+sumera&IN=&CPC=&IC=&Submit=Search

Beside " coils improvement engineering",transmission/gear  ideas et cet.,for free thinking and conception for experiments in FEMM with probably results FATAL(e) : surprised  Shocking !

Do the Aut(h)ors it right or wrong = emissionaries or do it the receiver(e)s = the audience/fans/students it wrong or right ?

Dale Carnegie ( not directly familiar related,not literary thinking : Adamo-Asamo/Bible or Lucy/Anthropology)
citating Andrew Carnegie( one from the US railway-pioneers,Macenato Carnegie-Hall/NY)

" The right instruments to the right people ( for success and better sleep)"

probably from probare     pro ve   pro be and counter : Gegen-Pro-be : same ? 1:1 ? Yes ! No!
Quod erat demonstandum ~ ve ~ was zu beweisen ist/war/waere q.e.d. pro varus et veritas

cum laudae/ Laudatio      or cum 'leck mich'nach dem Buckl'runterrutschn' ( Ars...-Kriecher)

Applaudere : the finest  to find : de Mexiko " la ola" ( it began with the soccer-WM or with the Tennis-Davis-Cup
in MExiko, La OLA as global phenomen later )
ol(-a-)meken der tol(l)-teken zusammen eben Mix-teken

Woher man(n) so wat(t) weisz : "Indianer vor Columbus"gebunden,nit die Indianer sondern das Werk- als "Buch" -,49 Mark geblecht  Naduerli Ost-Mark,waren noch die "wuidn Siebziga",voriges Jahrhundert

An die philologischen " Retter der deutschen Sprach-und Bild-Kultur" :
Klaro waere "vorherriges Jahrhundert" die kardinaere Schreibweise der grammatischen Rechtschreibungsart,aber die deutsche Leitkultur ist heute-zu-Tage eher -ordinaer- gedacht und " gesagt"-geschrieben :
"UNTER ALLER SAU !"

Das LEITBILD soll man im Allgemeinem wohl dem Springer-"BILD(+amS)" anpassen !So Nieder~ bajo/baju -Awarisch : Verjelts Got' !


  BILD'E DIR DEINE INDIVIDUELLE MEINUNG ZUR ALLGEMEINER GEWISSHEIT
( Auf die ungeschriebene Interpunktion achten !  So waejn Teufel und Detail)

DEUTSCHES SPRACHENGENEERING = Deutschlehrer,die mit der Fibel/Vibel/Bibel :

Das kleine Alpha ,der allgemeine Beginn, bis hin zum kleinen O : die Genesis/Das WERDEN bis zum heutigem IST
und der Weg bisher : Meta oder Mega fuer das wo-hin und mit-wem !
                   
                   SPRACHINGENIEURE,Bereich NLP
                   SPRACHE IST GEISTESWERK OPERA
Vielleicht das " deutsche Ablativ und das deutsche Vokativ" wieder aufleben lassenso wie es in Kombination der Kapitel/Kategorien einstmals Immanuel Kant proklamierte :
                  LEBE DEMNACH,VERSUCH ES ZUMINDEST !

       ERKENNE DICH SELBST       RELEASE YOURSELF

                                    Tagebuch/diary







What the engineers/re-searcher global know(e)s about the TRIZ-developper https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRIZ    and his "system analysis about human scientifical-technical


development ´status quo` " ?


and this in relationship to 10 years =utility model ( not/never patent-office peers approved) and 20 years =technical patent (patent-office peers approved or not)commercial rights validation max  ? Priority date + : later "open source"=fee-(licence-free


But he did not researched the second huge works-archive,useable POR GRATIA = GRATIS,FOR FREE




the myriads of promotions and habilitations : to seen as Titular : Diplom- and Dr./Dra.(docere = to teach authorization  :Doktor ) and Master of .....


                                                                                           
             EVER PEERS (Universitary Dozenten,Professoren) APPROVED ( okay,included Plagiat/es,but illegal)
                                               AND GRANTED

               If not "GRANTED"= no Title ! Minimum Diplom ~ baccalaureat ,higher Doctor/Master-degree


pere,pai singular means father/Vater/Pater         peer = plural from pere = the Fathers/Vaeter/Patres(also Padres)




Honorable Works,not commercial = NO PROFIT ! NO GAIN !






Is it better to re/find in the global PCT archive models/concepts with or without "citings" ? And/or "cited" ?








If a person wants to kill a tiger, he speaks of sport. When a tiger kills a person, it is cruelty.


                                                                                                                                         George Bernard Shaw


                                                                       FEINSINN is not SINN FEIN
Venire
Videre
Vincere win-cere

                                                                                 veni,vidi vici
Mr.Sykes ,from Julius Gaius Chaesar - it is written and said- this prolog - in his life Rubicon




                                                       NOT MY WAY AND NOT MY KIND OF LIFE

[lancaIV]

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/andp.19053221004


http://www.helmut-hille.de/prinzip.html   
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.helmut-hille.de%2Fprinzip.html

https://www2.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de/~bruhn/Bearden-ch4.htm




Aetherenergie ,Vakuumenergie ,Feldkraft ,..... ?


Aetherenergie : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson%E2%80%93Morley_experiment


Vakuumenergie : https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/andp.19053221004




Feldkraftenergie : https://www2.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de/~bruhn/Bearden-ch4.htm

Extraordinary Physics[/t] CHAPTER 4 EXTRAORDINARY PHYSICS        About the time of the U.S. Civil War, James Clerk Maxwell succeeded in unifying magnetism and electricity.  Actually he did far more than that, in his theory as originally written.     In fact, he had produced a theory which also captured the free interchange between electromagnetic energy and gravitational energy, but no one - including Maxwell himself - realized it at the time.     Maxwell wrote his original theory in quaternion and quaternion-like mathematics.Wrong! In the original article from 1865 Maxwell does not use any quaternions. The revised version from 1873 contains quaternions only in some main equations. All calculations are executed in component representation without referring to quaternion calculus, cf. [3].The modern form of vector mathematics had not yet been finalized by Gibbs and Heaviside.  It is most instructional to examine some of the fundamental differences between a vector and a quaternion.     In a conventional 3-dimensional vector, one may have three vector components, such as                    v = ai + bj + ck                          (4-1) where i, j, k are unit vectors in the directions of the x, y, and z axes respectively and a, b, and c are constants.     Obviously if the vector components of vector v are zero, then                    v = 0                                          (4-2)      We shall be interested in the "vector product" of two identical vectors v, where                    v X v = AA sinØ = 0                  (4-3)Error: Type mismatch! The left hand side of (4-3) is a vector, the middle part is single number.and A is the length (magnitude) of vector v, Ø is the angle between the two vectors (in this case zero), and 0 is the zero vector.     Now let us look for a moment at the quaternion situation. First, in addition to the three vector components, a quatemion also has a separate scalar component, w.  So the quatemion q for this situation is                     q = w + ai + bj + ck                   (4-4)      Now when this quatemion is multiplied times itself, the vector part zeros, just as it did for the vector expression.  However, the scalar part does not go to zero.  Instead, we have                      q X q = A2 = a2 +b2 +c2          (4-5)Error: The definition of the quaternions product is            (α,a) (β,b) : = (αβ − a·b, a×b + αb + βa) This yields             q q = (w,v) (w,v) = (w² − v·v, 0 + 2 wv), where q = (w,v) = w + v = w + ai + bj+ ck. Even if we remove the scalar w in the definition (4-4) of the quaternion q, i.e. we consider q' = (0,v), then we obtain             q' q' = (0,v) (0,v) = (− v·v, 0) = − (a² + b² + c²), that means that, at least, (4-5) has a wrong sign.       There is a very good physical interpretation of this result.  It is a square of the amplitude, hence for the vector part of a wave, it is directly proportional to the energy density of the vacuum, as a function of time, at the particular position.  . . . What follows are several lines of Bearden's verbal speculations containing no equations and can hence be skipped. Then Bearden returns to his consideration:        But to return to our vector/quaternion examples. Note also that the two vectors                       v1= ai + bj + ck,                       v2 = -ai - bj - ck                                  (4-6) sum to zero vectorially when added, such that                   v1 + v2 = 0                                              (4-7)     However, quaternions may behave quite differently, even under addition.  For example, the two quaternions                    q1= w + ai + bj + ck,                    q2 =w - ai -bj - ck                                   (4-8)     sum their vector parts to a vector zero resultant, but do not sum to a scalar zero as well.  Instead, they sum to                   q1 + q2 = 2w                                            (4-9) Evidently, Bearden's idea is that each physical field vector v should be replaced with a quaternion q = (−v²,v) (we have added a minus sign to the scalar part due to our preceeding remark), where the scalar part is proportional to the energy density of the vector field shown in the vector part. Then the addition of two quaternions of that type, q1 = (−v1²,v1) and q2 = (−v2²,v2) would give the energy density of the sum field v1 + v2, especially in the case v := v2 = − v1, which would yield the quaternion sum (− v², v) (− v², − v) = (− 2 v² , 0). The question for the physical meaning of that calculation arises.Is there any well-known physical phenomenon, which could be interpreted in the sense of the above equation? There is the phenomenon of destructive interference of two electromagnetic waves one could think of. We have analyzed a realistic experimental device, a so-called beam splitter for generating destructive interference of two electromagnetic waves in [2]. We consider a (loss-free) halftransparent mirror, a λ/4-plate, that is spotlighted with two linear polarized laser beams from two sides under 45° angle of incidence, the phase difference of which is π/2. Then on one side of the plate the transmitted and the reflected beams respectively are totally extinguished due to destructive interference. And one can calculate the energy density contained in that zeroed field.                                        On one side of the plate we have total destructive interference. The total energy that is radiated in by the arriving beams runs off completely on the opposite side of the plate.Thus, the energy conservation law yields zero energy for the extinguished field.Therefore destructive interference cannot be used as an example of vector zero resultant fields in the sense of quaternions. Since the rest of Bearden's article contains no further concrete examples of vector zero resultant quaternion fields we close our Commentary here.                                  THE CONDITIONING FROM THIS ABOVE RED TEXT(E) : DESTRUCTIVE INTERFERENCE                                                                                SIDE A / SIDE B                                                           100/0     75/25     50/50   25/75       0/100                                                     each case results 100 : conservation of energy                                                     BUT:         displacement http://www.geminielectricmotor.com/ The revolutionary and yet simple design of the GEMINI promises to become the world's most energy efficient electric motor and generator. The GEMINI produces optimum rotational power and torque by using BOTH sides of the energised coil, and it does so without consuming any additional energy. The GEMINI achieves its outstanding performance by providing in its ingenious design, THREE separate energy fields. Two fields contribute to rotational power and torque, while the third produces independent electricity from normally unused electromagnetic fields within the motor.                " ..... BOTH sides of the energized coil,......    " ..... THREE separate energy fields. ....."                        Both sides  of                      coils                     ?       separate energy fields           ? = same number,amplified energy The electricity generated by this third field could be used to recharge the GEMINI's battery power source or be fed back into the motor, thus reducing the energy demand from the power source. On electric vehicles this additional power generation could be used to run devices such as lights and horns. We believe that the GEMINI is the only motor in the world today with the above features. Of particular relevance is its ability to generate power at all times while the motor is under load. Such a feature gives the GEMINI an exclusive advantage over other electric motors. As a generator of electricity, the GEMINI's twin magnetic fields will greatly increase its electricity generating output. Energy Recovery A further development of the Ettridge technology, was the integration of a regenerative capability. Apparatus was developed that enabled current to be extracted from the motor while in operation, without placing a load upon the motor. While many motors feature an ability to draw energy from the motor while breaking or other low load scenarios, the Gemini motor can produce a real output at all times, even while under heavy load. This output can be fed back into the motor, or used to recharge the source, and augments the efficiency gains already apparent in the design. A number of different implementations exist for this method, and one is illustrated in Figure 5, taken from the patent. Not far from this development and improvements : https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=fred+miekka&IN=&CPC=&IC=&Submit=Search

[EMJunkie]

@lancaIV - You have a pretty good understanding on this subject!

Do you have any experiments to verify your theory?

Keep at it, never give up, its not as hard as you may think! We have had many successes!

Best wishes,
   Chris Sykes


P.S: Moderating the Trolls out of this subject would be great! I have contacted Stefan, currently he is busy and said he will have time next week to do something.