Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

TinselKoala · February 05, 2015, 02:29:40 AM

Quote from: picowatt on February 05, 2015, 01:37:13 AM
TK,

Thanks for posting that link to your "a wire is not always just a wire" video.

Should be mandatory viewing...

PW

You're welcome, and I agree.

I sure wish I still had access to that nice equipment, but it's 2000 miles away now and no doubt sitting unused and neglected on a high shelf.

TinselKoala · February 05, 2015, 02:36:23 AM

Quote from: John.K1 on February 05, 2015, 02:28:04 AM
Hi TK. I recall my setup I showed here many pages ago very similar to yours. The difference is I use the Air core and my central load is the bulb (1R) , I also get HV around your value at your amps consumption (at around 12V). Interesting is the distribution of the fields around the coil when I probe it with the small coil and LED. When I probe the top -outside of my tube I have it enough bright. When I move it just over the edge inside , it is maximally bright. Also there is possible to feel strong ionisation inside of the tube. I was just thinking what if I will put some parallel wires so that ionised air drugs it all the way down? I want also to try to put two primaries -in parallel - one at the each end - so that the signals will travel against each other in proper way?

Yes, please do experiment, and keep good documentation, I'm sure EMJ and the rest of us would like to see what you come up with. Air core resonators can reach very high voltages because air is not saturable... Ferrites and steels will saturate at some level of applied magnetic field and limit the voltage rise from resonant systems. But air doesn't saturate and with proper tuning... well, you can make Tesla coils, 1/4 wave resonators that attain very high voltage by VRSWR: voltage rise through standing wave resonance. They also are very good at creating external E and M fields as you see when you probe with your coil-LED combo. If you can tune this little wireless receiver precisely (by adding a capacitor of the right value, and/or varying the inductance of the coil) you may get increased range and sensitivity. I've got a few videos covering this issue, since it's my own area of interest as well.

TinselKoala · February 05, 2015, 02:40:22 AM

Quote from: MarkE on February 05, 2015, 01:59:31 AM
No it is anything but free. Those big spikes and ringing deliver lots of RF into the air, dissipate lots of power in the MOSFET and diode, but do not deliver much power to the cement load resistor. The circuit is an exercise in the bad things that happen when a fast switching MOSFET meets unclamped inductance.

Well yes, I agree of course.

But "bad" only for certain values of "bad"! If it's the desired effect, then it's not bad! Just very hard on the poor little mosfet. With proper circuit design the mosfet heating can be reduced greatly and you can still get the RF (aka "radiant"), as you know. But it's at the bleeding edges of nonlinear behaviour where the most interesting things can be found. Still no reason to get caught up in faulty conclusions drawn from improper measurement technique, though.

John.K1 · February 05, 2015, 02:55:34 AM

Hi TK, yes, I know it is like 2 tesla coils. I would like to point out the experiment with two Tesla coils - one transmitting, one receiving - both connected on the top. I have seen this several times before and you can see basic experiment like that on YouTube Alex Romanov, where he shows such set-up. He shows a bit more on the output.

MarkE · February 05, 2015, 03:01:03 AM

Quote from: TinselKoala on February 05, 2015, 02:40:22 AM
Well yes, I agree of course.

But "bad" only for certain values of "bad"! If it's the desired effect, then it's not bad! Just very hard on the poor little mosfet. With proper circuit design the mosfet heating can be reduced greatly and you can still get the RF (aka "radiant"), as you know. But it's at the bleeding edges of nonlinear behaviour where the most interesting things can be found. Still no reason to get caught up in faulty conclusions drawn from improper measurement technique, though.

There is:

No stated hypothesis.
No stated experiment that shows an anomalous result.
No demonstrated configuration that shows measurements that lead to the stated claims.

In that sense it is a ridiculous joke. Hopefully, you can salvage some value out of this farce by demonstrating a thing or two, particularly as to how to perform measurements properly.

Your video doesn't seem to be up just yet.