Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[MarkE]

Not that Tk needs defending but he didn't make an ou claim did he? Did I miss a post?

TK made no such claim.  EMJ who also claims he doesn't care about measurements did.  EMJ's entire presentation has been a farce from the outset.  He has made specific quantitative claims while disclaiming any quantity measurements.  He has presented test fixturing that does not reliably measure either of the two quantities that are required to compose his specific quantitative claims.  The entire exercise has been EMJ's joke on any who have taken him seriously.

[ramset]

Tinsel
your time and efforts are greatly appreciated here ,your willingness to explore and
experiment are a tremendous asset to this community,especially when combined with constructive input.
some of us are going to try to get your equipment from Canada
so you can do even more here,also I have read that you need a Scope [about 400.00].


Note **we already have some financial commitments for this equipment move from Canada
still more needed , many hands make light work.


and the newer scope is a recent development .

any parties interested in assisting us in this venture please PM myself or Mark Dansie


or Email ChetKremens@gmail.com


with the proper equipment some very interesting Things can be explored
right here ,and perhaps some new text can be added to the books....


respectfully
Chet
PS
I might add ...Many persons wish they could explore and experiment at the level being demonstrated here...
we cannot all be skilled in all fields,but we can do our part by supporting Men that have the skills to do the experiments in an honest and sincere fashion.

There are some really interesting experiments that need doing ,this stressing the fields as well as the cores and doing what seems counter intuitive has Merit.

here we have SOME cooperation ,  it is a very nice model and it works ....


please help,....we can make this MUCH better.

[MileHigh]

You ask TK where he thinks this huge spike/Ringing is coming from?

If you understand electronics you know exactly where the spike comes from.  In fact, in this thread it has already been explained in one way or another a few times.  So there is no mystery.

Did you see TK stringing neons together?  I bet you he can light 150 LEDs in series if he wants to.  You could put the right number of turns on the core so that it just starts to saturate at the standard LED forward current level.  Or perhaps a bit higher than that because the LEDs will be running at a low duty cycle.  Anyway, the point being that you could suck all of the magnetic energy out of the core and power a very long string of LEDs in series in safety without worrying abuot damaging the LEDs.  You could probably dimly light 300 LEDs in series like this.  Big deal, that is so trivial and ordinary that it means nothing - if you understand electronics.

So here is where you have to take a step back.  You just need to educate yourself about the basics of electronics.  That is the reality that you need to confront.  I don't know what you have been doing for how many years you have been working on this stuff, but whatever it was, it certainly was not very productive.

I sometimes mention that knowledge progresses like a glacier on the forums.  Case in point:  I just peeked on EF and there are people still talking about testing your circuit and manipulating the Bloch walls of the coils.  The glacier can stop and even move backwards if there is enough wilful ignorance out there.

You know, RTFM!  RTFM!  RTFM!

MileHigh

[TinselKoala]

The latest video:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=smocfnCxwKM looks good. 

The video demonstrates that the circuit throws out lots of RF:  enough to light the NE2 just from the field across its leads.  Of course all of that RF energy comes from the power source and never makes it through the cement resistor.  What does it say about the hypothesis?  Oh that's right:  There is no hypothesis under test.  There is a claim of ovrunity from a fixture that is not insturmented to properly measure either input or output power.

No such claim by me! My  only hypothesis here is that similar circuits will perform similarly.

Now here's a clue for us all: If that 10 Watt load resistor is not getting perceptibly warm to the touch, there is very little power being dissipated in it. In fact one should probably use a lower wattage resistor here and monitor its temperature carefully. If it doesn't get warm... The Walrus was Paul. 

Unfortunately my DSO, the old Link, cannot do trace multiplication, so I can't easily do a valid output power measurement, even though my FG is isolated. To measure the output power one would monitor the output as Conradelectro has done, with one probe looking at the V output across the load and inline CVR and the other probe looking just at Vdrop across the CVR itself with very short connecting leads. One assumes that the probes don't perturb the output very much. Then one would disconnect the probes from the output and do a similar measurement of the input power on the scope. I have not yet looked at the input waveshape to see how accurate the inline current meter is reading.

Ultimately I can do the measurements with the DSO, dump the data into the spreadsheet and generate an instantaneous power curve for both input and output sets of readings, then integrate them over a suitable number of whole cycles to get an energy balance. If I can maintain the enthusiasm, of course.

I'm hoping the Tooth Fairy will put one of these under my pillow:
http://www.tequipment.net/Rigol/DS1054Z/Digital-Oscilloscopes/

[TinselKoala]

Great vid! Thank god for Chinese takeout:) is your core from an old fly back?

Yes. It has one little plastic spacer in between the halves. The noise in the video is the assembly singing at 1.7 kHz.