Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[EMJunkie]

When the OP of a thread titled "Partnered output coils-free energy" posts links to "just a little more data", who would actually think that he was not referring to what is mentioned in the OP of this thread.  On top of that, when MarkE pointed out that the secondaries were in series, you sure seemed to make the case that you believed he was wrong.

This, combined with your apparent read/assumptions of that "1200 watts out for 140 watts in article" does make me question whether you actually read the links you post.

Also note that unlike you, I did not feel the need to sling insults or derogatory comments your way, as is your apparent concept of a "discussion".

And as for having an open mind, are you sure yours indeed is? 

PW

PW, Be embarrassed, because the very first line of your reply starts with yet another ASSUMPTION!!!

When the OP of a thread titled "Partnered output coils-free energy" posts links to "just a little more data", who would actually think that he was not referring to what is mentioned in the OP of this thread.

I mean come on! Really, you have no idea! Please do yourself a favour, ask yourself, what's the point of this Patent? Why would Chris bring this patent here, showing what it does?

Your BIGGEST Assumption is simply, that:

Bucking, is limited to Magnetic Fields Opposing with no Electrical Output!

When, for years, I have VERY CLEARLY shown, that this is NOT the limit to Partnered Output Coils! See how terrible this ASSUMPTION really is!!!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[picowatt]

I mean really Look at the context of what this Patent is saying! This is my point, even if Brain Dead, Infected Parasites like MileHigh cant comprehend these basic principals that this Patent clearly lay's out, for a specific reason, to achieve a goal, by design!!!

The stated objective is to achieve a goal by Separating the Secondary Coils, which is what I have been saying for many years now! Partnered Output Coils!

Ask yourself, what else can be done by separating the Secondary Coils? One comes to mind, KOEING, as I have already stated: http://www.padrak.com/ine/KOENIG2.html

I don't care about Parasites like MileHigh, well I do, I hope they come to their senses but hold no hope, but for others, trying to learn, trying to make a difference....

   Chris Sykes
        hyiq.org

This post is not resonating with me at all.  You claim to have free energy devices that use a "specially wound" transformer.  Now you seem to want to use any instance of any transformer that has a split or separated secondary for any reason whatsoever (reduction of inter-winding capacitance or voltage for example) as some sort of straw man proof to bolster your free energy claims (in the complete absence of any proof directly related to your free energy claims).

Instead of trying to prove your technology actually generates "free energy" by using unrelated examples such as this patent, why do you not provide any evidence (actual measurements or a device powering something without the need for external power)?  Your "self assisted oscillations" video was from 2011 and I believe prior to that was your COP=1.7 device.  Why are you not proudly displaying those "technologies" doing something useful?

PW

[EMJunkie]

This post is not resonating with me at all.  You claim to have free energy devices that use a "specially wound" transformer.  Now you seem to want to use any instance of any transformer that has a split or separated secondary for any reason whatsoever (reduction of inter-winding capacitance or voltage for example) as some sort of straw man proof to bolster your free energy claims (in the complete absence of any proof directly related to your free energy claims).

Instead of trying to prove your technology actually generates "free energy" by using unrelated examples such as this patent, why do you not provide any evidence (actual measurements or a device powering something without the need for external power)?  Your "self assisted oscillations" video was from 2011 and I believe prior to that was your COP=1.7 device.  Why are you not proudly displaying those "technologies" doing something useful?

PW

PW, look, I don't mind you, you're just difficult... I sort of understand why.

Spend 8 seconds and watch this: Click Here

Listen VERY carefully! Listen to what is said! Understand the Meaning! Then ask yourself, I wonder why such a statement would be made?

Now, what have I said in the past, I remember saying something to the degree of, there are lots of ways this can work, it's not limited to one way in particular. There is always a possibility to build a better mouse trap! Why limit ones options?

Akula0083 has done many demonstrations, did you ever benifet from these?

Floyd Sweet?

Steven Mark?

Really the list goes on! No one can build this from a demonstration unless they are outright Lucky! One needs to think about the Coils, How they can work Together! Look at reasons what Other devices have worked. Besides, you and others here still to this day dispute my existing videos so why would another demonstration be of any use? You, as others will, also dispute that also! There is no point me showing you anything except Real Data this, the only thing that the Human mind can look at and absorb and make conscious decision on, "Well, this is good data and makes sense!"

This is the best way to present something, let you see some data and you can make your mind up. Its called Free Will...

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[picowatt]

EMJ,

Did you actually read the previous link you posted?  It was more an argument against the claimed "partnered" coils than it was in any way in support of your claims.

Again, why are you not demonstrating YOUR stuff doing something useful?

Is any one of those claimed "free energy devices" of yours, or those "successes" you claim others are having, able to do anything at all useful?

PW

[MarkE]

I mean really Look at the context of what this Patent is saying! This is my point, even if Brain Dead, Infected Parasites like MileHigh cant comprehend these basic principals that this Patent clearly lay's out, for a specific reason, to achieve a goal, by design!!!

The stated objective is to achieve a goal by Separating the Secondary Coils, which is what I have been saying for many years now! Partnered Output Coils!

Ask yourself, what else can be done by separating the Secondary Coils? One comes to mind, KOEING, as I have already stated: http://www.padrak.com/ine/KOENIG2.html

I don't care about Parasites like MileHigh, well I do, I hope they come to their senses but hold no hope, but for others, trying to learn, trying to make a difference....

   Chris Sykes
        hyiq.org

LOL, the patent you cite does not separate the coils.  It: splits the secondary into two halves, and winds those two halves oppositely to reduce capacitive coupling which distorts the signal and transfers unwanted common mode energy between the primary and secondary.  It specifically does not wire the secondaries in the bucking configuration that you advocate.  Neither does it attempt to gain efficiency or claim energy generation with the winding configuration used.  It attempts and succeeds at reducing the transfer of common mode energy.  That reduces the transmission of electrical noise between the primary and secondary.  Whereas what you promote reduces the differential signal ideally to zero while doubling the common mode energy transfer.  What you promote undoes the good of the patent and then aggravates the result.

Koenig's useless patent has been discussed in detail before.  If you wish to resurrect the discussion feel free to make what claims you will for Koenig and we can see if any have merit.