How Rosch probably faked their 5 KWatt KPP AuKW

[MarkE]

They should have included Mark Dansie and Stefan.  Then we would have people there that we would believe, and they actually know what they are doing.

Bill

Of course they have.  Those two are poster children for "suspend disbelief".

[TinselKoala]

We've seen the photos of where the bracket attached to the wall, and it certainly looks to me like there has been a hole filled in there. But what about the place where that bracket attached to the _tube_ itself? It would not be possible to weld that location without repainting the tube, I think. Does anyone have any photos that show this area? A view from the inside of the tube showing the attach point would be very instructive, I think.

[markdansie]

They should have included Mark Dansie and Stefan.  Then we would have people there that we would believe, and they actually know what they are doing.

Bill

Thanks Bill but in reality I always employ engineers and scientists who have much more skills than me. I help with designing the methodology and looking for the trick lol. (its like going to a a magic show and figuring it out.


I know some good scientists in Germany who would do an excellent job. Mark E would be the person I would most like to see.


But that will never happen and we know why.
Kind Regards

[Philip Hardcastle]

SC on pestricky said


"I had a close look to see where this hose went a week or so ago. I was curious because I thought they may have a valve on the tank to drain it rather than this sort of set-up.


That hose there is the filling/topping up hose.When it needed topping up, they just connected another hose to it.From what I was able to see on dis-assembly day, this hose runs down to the bottom of the tank. It seems to be quite a fat hose in comparison to the virtual garden hose connected on to it. Which kinda puzzled me why it needed to be so big.
When they drained the tank, they connected the hose to this fitting.
Other views/thoughts on this ?"


Well my immediate thought was to wonder if it was simply a compressed air hose, if it was a water top up hose it would only need to be at the top!


If it is a compressed air hose it would need to feed into the buoyancy cups at the bottom.


If it were a top up hose then it is strange that there is a rust mark on the inside of the unit only half way up, did someone forget to turn on the tap.........


Clearly the scam is childish in all respects except that it is fleecing people of money.


The simplest way for them to prove the device would be to simply mechanically link the output to a shaft drive air compressor, then even if it just kept turning without a load for a day MarkE and others would be moved to question reason.

[markdansie]

Clearly the scam is childish in all respects except that it is fleecing people of money.

The simplest way for them to prove the device would be to simply mechanically link the output to a shaft drive air compressor, then even if it just kept turning without a load for a day MarkE and others would be moved to question reason.

I fully agree
The other way is to just measure the torque on the output shaft with no generator connected and then just measure electricity consumed by the compressor. The output will always be less than the input. Why they avoid these simple proof of concepts is beyond reasonable doubt.