Is this a miracle or a scam?

[MarkE]

To SoManyWires:
I know that some healthy scepticism is required but an extreme scepticism is obviously destuctive. I wrote to these Black Box guys at ryblackbox@gmail.com as written in the text of their YouTube clip. They answered my questions. My first impression is that these men are honest. They really want collaboration and partnership for mass production of their device. They are now negotiating with several electric vehicle manufacturers. The latter are pragmatic businessmen who are not interested in theoretical discussions related to fundamental scientific problem. They are interested only in properly working devices. If a device works properly, then it is put into practice as soon as possible and that's all. No questions and no debates. A typically pragmatic approach. But why don't you write to these gentlemen at ryblackbox@gmail.com? You can ask your questions and get some authentic information from the primary source. But I would like to give you a small frienly advice -- please express your thoughts more clearly, please use shorter sentences and please use capital letters, dots and commas. In one word, please respect the audience.
All the best,

The story that they are negotiating with car manufacturers is beyond silly. 

[pomodoro]

I haven't heard of any investors in over unity devices ever making money, in the whole of history. Only the 'inventor' makes money, and that's from the investors.

[tinman]

It seems to me that almost all comments here are not very correct.
1) To SoManyWires. I do not see any reasonable arguement in your comment. You are only exercising your English writing abilities.
2) To MarkE. Your comment seems to be more reasonable. But any, even not very qualified, electrical engineer knows that: brighter lamp=more current flowing, bigger voltage drop and bigger power consumption and dimmer lamp=less current flowing, smaller voltage drop and smaller power consumption. The two dimmer lamps are at the inlet and the two brighter lamps are at the outlet. The output power, detected by the two brighter lamps, is obviously much bigger than the input power, detected by the two dimmer lamps. You do not need any measurements. You do not need any voltmeters and ammeters.
3) To Jimboot. Yes, this is a good comment. But why don't you write to their email address? I will do this today.
4) To idegen. Take your medicine and go to sleep.
5) Final words. Look, I am not an advocate of the BLACK BOX guys. But let us be correct, honest and well-intentioned.

Oh dear

[MarkE]

Oh dear

I suppose we could publish a primer on Ohm's law for his benefit.  But seeing as how he is so deluded as to assert that car companies are negotiating for the "technology", it would seem a wasted effort.

[SoManyWires]

To SoManyWires:
I know that some healthy scepticism is required but an extreme scepticism is obviously destuctive. I wrote to these Black Box guys at ryblackbox@gmail.com as written in the text of their YouTube clip. They answered my questions. My first impression is that these men are honest. They really want collaboration and partnership for mass production of their device. They are now negotiating with several electric vehicle manufacturers. The latter are pragmatic businessmen who are not interested in theoretical discussions related to fundamental scientific problem. They are interested only in properly working devices. If a device works properly, then it is put into practice as soon as possible and that's all. No questions and no debates. A typically pragmatic approach. But why don't you write to these gentlemen at ryblackbox@gmail.com? You can ask your questions and get some authentic information from the primary source. But I would like to give you a small frienly advice -- please express your thoughts more clearly, please use shorter sentences and please use capital letters, dots and commas. In one word, please respect the audience.
All the best,

prag·mat·ic
praɡˈmadik/
adjective
adjective: pragmatic

    dealing with things sensibly and realistically in a way that is based on practical rather than theoretical considerations.


such as one might do when asked what they think after seeing a black box with 4 wires and a light bulb.

perhaps you sir may re-evaluate your concern about showing respect as you suggested i do, and focus on seeing the forest for the trees.
while not using exact proper punctual grammerical correctness, i did offer my opinion on the device you presented here in this forum,
and you would prefer to point out things such as proper spelling or usage of capitol letters, or how you prefer to read the shortest of possible explainations, can short explainations always allow one to convey enough? while i do agree with the underlying sentiment, about the admirable talent directed towards those who do a better job of it while using less words.

if the developer of the black box you presented here would like to add a few extra words to back up their claim, others would like to read it.
ideally using their own words.