New reactionless motor from India

[gravityblock]

LOL another Gravock fail.

No, this is your epic fail and not mine.  Don't throw your own short-comings off onto me.

Gravock

[gravityblock]

The discussion is entirely silly and entirely hilarious.

Yhea, and it's even more hilarious because you don't realize the joke is on you!

Gravock

[MarkE]

Yhea, and it's even more hilarious because you don't realize the joke is on you!

Gravock

LOL.  Sure it is.

[allcanadian]

@All


I read the full article and believe this may have some credibility. First the inventor Tewari has been an electrical engineer for some 58 years and is an expert on nuclear energy having acted in multiple boards and commissions. To my knowledge no one here has a fraction of Tewari's proven expertise and are hardly qualified to judge anything considering the lack of technical data. Thus any claims that it cannot work are simply hearsay and speculation... nothing more.


As well the inventor specifically states that the generator is a reaction-less generator having very little back-torque. He states, "the magnetic circuit within the machine is configured to cancel back torque while inducing current and producing power". I believe this has credibility based on my own experiments at the bench concerning my permanent magnet motor with no generator action. At first I did not think this was possible however I have proven it to be true. As well my permanent magnet motor with no generator action also uses a modification of the magnetic circuit to specifically negate all generator action. Thus I have no need to speculate about a motor with no generator action through modification of the magnetic circuit... I have proven it to be true through real experiments.


At which point we are left with quite a few questions concerning this technology. First claiming it cannot work is unfounded speculation because we do not know because we have no technical data or specifications... we do not know if it works or not. It would seem to me the effect revolves around what was claimed in the article:

Mr. Tewari showed me a stiff conductor about a foot long which was allowed to rotate at the center and connected at each end with small gauge wire. A magnetic circuit was placed under the conductor. When a current was allowed to flow through the conductor it rotated, due to a torque induced on the conductor according to Flemings Left Hand Rule and standard theory, verified by experiments at the dawn of the electrical age. With a simple rearrangement of the magnetic circuit, the same current produced no rotation – the torque was cancelled.

It would seem to me the most logical place to start would be to spend 10 minutes of your life and reproduce this simple experiment for yourself then proceed from there just as Tewari did. I mean he has basically told you how he came to develop this technology...rearrangement of the magnetic circuit... so why wouldn't you?.  I guess it is much easier to just sit back and throw around unfounded accusations and speculate how it cannot work that to prove the matter for ourselves.


AC

[MarkE]

@All


I read the full article and believe this may have some credibility. First the inventor Tewari has been an electrical engineer for some 58 years and is an expert on nuclear energy having acted in multiple boards and commissions. To my knowledge no one here has a fraction of Tewari's proven expertise and are hardly qualified to judge anything considering the lack of technical data. Thus any claims that it cannot work are simply hearsay and speculation... nothing more.

Now THAT is an appeal to authority.

As well the inventor specifically states that the generator is a reaction-less generator having very little back-torque. He states, "the magnetic circuit within the machine is configured to cancel back torque while inducing current and producing power". I believe this has credibility based on my own experiments at the bench concerning my permanent magnet motor with no generator action. At first I did not think this was possible however I have proven it to be true. As well my permanent magnet motor with no generator action also uses a modification of the magnetic circuit to specifically negate all generator action. Thus I have no need to speculate about a motor with no generator action... I have proven it to be true through real experiments.

Those are examples of reducing efficiency.  What you are going to have a very hard time proving is that you get energy out of a motor or a generator in excess of energy that you put in.

At which point we are left with quite a few questions concerning this technology. First claiming it cannot work is unfounded speculation because we do not know because we have no technical data or specifications... we do not know if it works or not. It would seem to the effect revolves around what was claimed in the article:

We in fact have more than 150 years of experience with electrodynamic machines and their very well understood and daily reproven operating principles.  Tewari makes the extraordinary claims against that evidence, has done so for years and has come up short on verifiable evidence every time.

It would seem to me the most logical place to start would be to spend 10 minutes of your life and reproduce this simple experiment for yourself then proceed from there just as Tewari did. I mean he has basically told you how he came to develop this technology...rearrangement of the magnetic circuit... so why wouldn't you?.  I guess it is much easier to just sit back and throw around unfounded accusations and speculate how it cannot work that to prove the matter for ourselves.[/size]

[/size]

[/size]

[/size]
AC[/size]

You are free to see if you can achieve the extraordinary and cheat the First Law of Energy to your heart's content.