World's first real Free Energy Flashlight - no shaking - no batteries! No Solar

[gravityblock]

Wonder if they would be interested in an AC super capacitor lol.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QLOkV5qIOgs

Making graphene super-capacitors with a DVD writer.  Maybe you can use this technique to make your triphene super-caps.  It's actually a "non-polarized" or "bipolar" super-cap (see image below).  Too bad MarkE is in a time-out, Lol!

Gravock

[Paul-R]

It seems that there is an inventor called Victor Uzlov who is the MD of the company.
http://www.ipaustralia.com.au/applicant/adgex-limited/patents/AU2015202321/

I can't find anything in USPTO or EPO

[MileHigh]

There are way too many warning flags for this, some are from the claims, some are from comments made by posters:

- There is no such thing as getting power from the Earth's magnetic field.
- It would be impossible to power the device for 12 hours if you tried to collect energy from ambient electro-smog.
- The "power from exotic sources" argument is a dead duck.  If that was really true why would you make a flashlight of all things?
- The price is sky-high at $99.  For example, if you want to be negative and assume it's a fraud, and assume that the makers of this device are gambling that they can sell 10,000 units, then that's one million dollars.  If your costs are $10 to make it, that means you could make $900,000 profit on a device that is a fake.
- If it is a "free energy" flashlight, why does it apparently only last from two to five years?  Why should it "wear out?"
- A capacitor almost certainly could not power the flashlight for 12 hours and there is no such thing as a self charging capacitor.  I am intentionally ignoring the known phenomenon that happens with electrolytic capacitors.
- There is no such thing as "tapping into the Schumann resonance frequencies of the Earth."
- Complete and total nonsense from their own promotional material, "we must follow the flow of the electron neutrino which pierces the Earth's atmosphere in all directions."  There is no such thing as an "electron neutrino."  There is no possibility of extracting energy from regular neutrinos.
- Their promotional material discussion that starts with this, "The resulting lightning strikes pump energy into the earth-atmosphere cavity..." is complete nonsense.
- This comment makes no sense, "The Earth's magnetic field emits power estimated at around 2,6992139х10²⁴ watts."
- Just because they show some drawings of a train means absolutely nothing.  I am willing to bet if you do some real searching that you will find that this company has zero footprint in the multi-billion-dollar rail transportation industry.  Chances are the only thing they have done is pay an artist $500 to produce a painting of a train on an "uprail" track so they can pretend that they are involved in the rail industry.  I searched on "uprail" and it looks like it is a concept only and has never actually been deployed in the field.
- This comment makes no sense, "...is there is a capacitor being slowly trickle charged by maybe a crystal based electrolyte, making it somewhat being battery powered.  What the capacitor is made of is unknown. could a antenna be used to help recharge itself from the radiant earth energy?"
- When they talk about "accumulators" it really sounds like they are talking about batteries.  Why not just say batteries?
- They are Russian, and that should make you become very cautious.
- They don't feel real at all:  http://www.businessinternett.com/en/atlant/

I am not feeling it at all.  To me, they are in the same league as the Keppe fan group.

[e2matrix]

Below is a quote as found on Adgex's website on the Adgex accumulator.  It appears they're tapping into the Schumann resonance frequencies of the earth.

Gravock

Thanks Gravrock,  I had not noticed that explanation.   That would be great if they have harnessed that kind of power although I suspect it would be expensive or difficult to get enough that way for powering something big.   LED efficiency has increased so much in the last 10 years that it doesn't take a lot of power for 120 Lumens of light. 

[lumen]

Thanks Gravrock,  I had not noticed that explanation.   That would be great if they have harnessed that kind of power although I suspect it would be expensive or difficult to get enough that way for powering something big.   LED efficiency has increased so much in the last 10 years that it doesn't take a lot of power for 120 Lumens of light.

They also say it can take 10-12 days to recharge when dead. It could likely be charged in less time with a small solar array in the handle.