Common batteries are free energy sources

[ResinRat2]

pg46,

Thanks for the info. and the details. It looks like it has some promise. I am going to hold off getting too excited because we are looking for a long term energy generation. I do appreciate your efforts and I look forward to your results on future cycles.

I may be a pessimist but my guess is the system will just gradually run down. It looks to me like all that is being done is the energy is being moved around. It probably won't last any longer than how long the light would take to deplete three batteries. Just a guess, and I could be wrong. It might last longer though, because the bulb is burning with less intensity, but it should still run down. Not last for for long periods of time like Tesla_2006 claimed.

Funny how he never got back to this thread.

I hope I'm wrong.

-----------------------------------------------

Hey Joe,

Thanks for the answers to my questions. I look forward to the pictures of your setup when you are able. Please, please be very careful with those 12V setups. Man, keep your eyes (smoke), ears (sizzle), and nose (fire) on red alert at all times. This is what makes me cautious. This is a strange setup and we don't want anybody hurt. Especially if it holds no benefit.

[PaulLowrance]

I didnt state that the MEG emits deadly sonic waves. I simply gave an indication that these waves must occur especially if you run it like J.Naudin by switching the magnet with bucking fields.

You did Kator. Here are your quotes,

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=30.msg11974#msg11974

Paul,

I just metioned that all experiments with the MEG including the HOPE delivered not enough energy to light up an incandescent bulb for proof. They always used neon-lights.

The second thing I mentioned is that in the MEG and related techiques there are supersonic waves generated because of Lorenz-Forces. These Lorenz-Forces are created by the bucking-fields ( created by the driver-coils). No one ever thougt about this. These sonic waves can become very nasty and are unhealthy. One has to be carefull getting to close to the system.

Kator




Paul,

I remember that Naudin himself pointed out the strong electromagnetic field around the MEG. No I do not have contact to Naudin.

For basic of what I mean please look at this

http://www.ndt.net/article/0398/huebsch/hueb.htm

The Frauenhofer-Institut is a German High-Tech-Deveopment Institut.

The basic principle consists of creating supersonic sound by direct interaction of magnetic fields within matter.
There is no transducer necessary. I hit a page where it was stated that they explore the technique to generate
supersonic sound in the GigaHerz-frequency-range. Standard medical equipment for sound-screening ( pictures of the fetus of pregnant women ) is in the range 1,7 to 17 MHz. Very dangerous for the unborn baby.
It leads too far in this category here but supersonic-sound is dangerous for the cells because it creates sonoluminiscence in the body-water although no that strong as in the scientific experiment we all know of.
The Ultraviolett flashes of the cololapsing bubbles have a temperature of about 10 000 degrees Celsius in piko-seconds. The UV-Light, even if it is very weak cracks the DNA ( example : sunburns and skin-cancer by UV-A )
It might be new to you but this is not desinformation or info to create panic. There are some reliable scientists here in germany who speak of this danger and have evidence.
The same goes for the cellular phones. Brain-Cells get holes burned in by standard-energylevel (gigaherz radiation) of cellular phones. I will post the pictures of this here later. I have to search for the info on my other computer

I personally abondoned this MEG-Stuff. It is a dead-end so far. The same is true for the HOPE.

Kator

See your quoted red text above. Sounds very clear to me.

Whether you accept the negative effects of supersonic-waves on tissue or not is not of importance here. A shielding of these Waves is another step to do in this development, later.

It is up to anyone to develop anything he likes in this area. I only stated this warning because these waves are not easy to detect.( You remember Madame Curie ? She was unconscious of the radiation and died because of this - I know this is a bad comparison example )

There you go again. Of course it is a terrible comparison because Madame Curie died of X-rays, not ultrasonic!  Please, anyone who is reading this do not allow such disinformation to scare you.

It is almost interesting: everytime I give this indication about this superrsonic-waves created by Lorentz-Forces and even when I give you valuable references of serious scientific-institues who have the knowledge about this I either face total silence or a reluctant attitude.

Kator, are you kidding me?  I replied to all your posts. You are the one who ignored my reply.  Here's the link to my post, which you never replied to -->
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,30.msg11974.html#msg11974

I then made a huge post in the News section attempting to clear up your disinformation, which again you did not reply.

Did you ever read what I had given as an reference ? ( EMUS-Converter, german-development )

Of course I read them. I replied showing your error. I gave you tons of references showing that deadly ultrasonic waves do not travel through air. Furthermore, it would require the person to place their face directly to a transducer that generated an incredible amount of ultrasonic energy to harm a person much less kill them!  Doctors place such transducers on pregnant women and I can promise you those transducers are designed to generate a lot of ultrasonic relative to any MEG.

Supersonic waves, if created in this device, combine with the electromagnetic flux-variation. It is an additive factor especially because they also create heat in the core, not eddy-currents ( nano-core hardly has eddy-currents)

You mean the core does not generate *macro* eddy currents. The core does indeed generate a tremendous amount of *micro* eddy currents near every avalanche. The electromagnetic flux-variation you are talking about occurs in every transformer. We've had transformers since the days of Tesla. I take the information you spread very serious.

I am really curious why you are so reluctant to my statements.

I already provided the links to your quotes that clearly demonstrate you were the one who quite and did not reply and that I replied to your posts.

I will not touch this subject anymore because it is clear to me, scientiically as well as technically.

Typical of disinformationist to hit and run because they can't back up their lies.

For those interested in real science that *pertains* to the MEG -->
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,1489.0.html

PaulL, let everyone here in this community decide for himself whether it is worth to continue with the MEG or not.

I'll continue to attempt to stop disinformation so that people can have the truth. I take your disinformation very seriously.

Now your second remark : Waste of time ? I really wonder if my english is so bad that you get it all wrong. This guy steals time and energy and money as well from people here and maybe in other similar communities. Any person who does this is not worth to be taken serious any longer, his posts included.
Waste of time relates to reading and experimenting on things he posts here.
It costed me nearly one day til I found the truth about this person because of a member here who I watched my reaction to Tesala_2006-posts.I watched this MEG-stuff since years now and wish you the best for your new approach on this.

You need to be very clear that you are not suggesting it is a waste of time to work on the MEG.


Regards,
Paul Lowrance

[ResinRat2]

Hey Kato01 and PaulLowrance,

Go get your own thread to beat up each other on, you are way off the subject so please do not waste space on this thread with your beefs.

Go start an MEG thread, or whatever you guys are arguing about.

Sheese!!!!

[FreeEnergy]

lol 

[kreten33]

Tesla switch is very interesting concept. According to Bedini it does work, he even sold a few copies of his solid-state switch plans. I personally haven?t built it yet (priorities?), but I would agree with Harti, mechanical switch would be better. As far as speed of switching is concerned it should be in the range of 100 ? 800 Hz (higher is dangerous, batteries ? 12v acid ? could explode). My hunch is that the resonance point of all 4 (3) batteries should be found (in the above mentioned range). Original Tesla switch is consisted of 4 batteries and they discharge-charge in serial-parallel fashion and vice-versa 100-800 times per second.
Hopefully this will help someone with time and resources to conduct an experiment.