Centrifugal Power Source: The Linevich Story

[seychelles]

HI all, i do not know if it is centripetal or centrifugal, but is rather interesting.
i have contacted the guy in Greece and he reckon 5000 euro for his 4.5kw..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-L6_rVmU5U
His other videos gives a bit more info of the working principle of his invention..

[Temporal Visitor]

http://www.ariplex.com/bg/bg_rotne.pdf


On page 13, this analysis of a reputed free energy device, reports an independent observation of what Aspden saw, apparently without any knowledge of his experiment.  I now need to gather observations of what Linevich saw:  apparent overunity in unbalanced rotation or vibration. Also, is there a clear hypothesis as to why or how this happens?

Yes it appears to be an independent observation like Aspden's, my question to you is: How can anyone/you use it if you, or "we"  are unable to "MAKE MORE of the same" - let alone "CREATE" energy?

As for Linevich seeing QUOTE QUOTE "apparent overunity"(LoL) : it is simply the acceleration of mass in conjunction with a lever and that combination is very real as explained beginning with 1/2mV^2 and the "Law of levers".

Unbalanced rotation or vibration can and will generate Kinetic energy but: also will make the device self destructing/short lived/high maintenance along with being/becoming an overly complicated mechanical mess/nightmare.

Attached find "specific, precise" photo's of a simplistic "device" using "cold hard lead" for its mass density rather than "concrete" that is functionally similar to Wuerth's stuff, made before ever having learned of his "stuff".

What could/would I "know" about any of this "using energy to MAKE MORE of the same" since you made the assertion there is "no real effect to iterate" ? ? ?

[lancaIV]

Robert Cook Inertial Propulsion Engine and a similar story !
http://www.forceborne.com/FBW/index2.htm


Linevich and partners did not find an investor to develop his idea !

The F. Wuerth Converter finally ended as a fraud. 

[Eighthman]

Thank you for the pictures. Perhaps you could supply a link that describes your mechanical device in detail.


I don't understand what you are saying.  If free energy is available from some sort of rotating mechanical arrangement, then how do we account for it within what is known about physics? It seems to me that either we are pulling energy from spinning nuclei (as Morgan/Wallace seem to be describing) or something like this:


http://www.intalek.com/Index/Index.htm


This second choice somehow involves separate inertial frames creating an energy difference between them.  This would be a huge loophole or exception within physics conservation of energy. If it were true, it comes close to saying, "that's just the way the universe works, don't expect any further reductionist explanation". And it may involve Relativity in a way no one thought...


Perhaps that is what you are trying to explain..... and maybe it is the final truth here.  Is it possible that inventors across time keep stumbling across this but reap rejection again and again?  I am not a physicist and I'm just trying to reason on this weirdness. 


Is it possible that the Aspden effect shows that energy can be removed from a flywheel in one amount........and then replaced by a lesser amount to maintain the RPM exactly where it started?  If so, is imbalance of the rotor required?

[lancaIV]

Yes it appears to be an independent observation like Aspden's, my question to you is: How can anyone/you use it if you, or "we"  are unable to "MAKE MORE of the same" - let alone "CREATE" energy?

As for Linevich seeing QUOTE QUOTE "apparent overunity"(LoL) : it is simply the acceleration of mass in conjunction with a lever and that combination is very real as explained beginning with 1/2mV^2 and the "Law of levers".

Unbalanced rotation or vibration can and will generate Kinetic energy but: also will make the device self destructing/short lived/high maintenance along with being/becoming an overly complicated mechanical mess/nightmare.

Attached find "specific, precise" photo's of a simplistic "device" using "cold hard lead" for its mass density rather than "concrete" that is functionally similar to Wuerth's stuff, made before ever having learned of his "stuff".

What could/would I "know" about any of this "using energy to MAKE MORE of the same" since you made the assertion there is "no real effect to iterate" ? ? ?

If this would be so easy then this publication content would be common,
"law of lever" here defined as  "A generator is rotated by using power by employing by physical principle an apparatus which utilizes a lever shaft increasing force" :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=4&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19830729&CC=JP&NR=S58127557A&KC=A