Interesting free energy experiment.

[tinman]

 author=TommeyLReed link=topic=16561.msg482287#msg482287 date=1461851969]



Tom...

Question: Where do you have the right to call other out while you have made claims that is questionable in the past like many of us.

What claims are they Tom?.

This is a experiment, so I don't understand why you would add to these comments in a negative way.

If you think my being honest is negative,then there is not much i can do about that.
TemperaVistitor made a claim,and i only asked that he would back up that claim. He said he could,but it would not be free--will cost me money. This i object to.

I understand you like to post your stuff, but let others do the same, and if they don't work then really we all learn don't we?

I also like to try and save people from spending there money on something that has been proven many times not to work--the bug flywheel/motor/generator setup.

A flywheel does have a secret energy that most can't see, as the inertia builds up to a maximum speed the atoms that hold the flywheel together explodes outward.

If the Atoms explode outwards,you have no flywheel any more.
You may be referring to !free electron's! ?,but the flywheel need be submersed in a magnetic field for that,and copper or silver is the best material for the job.

The most important part of this experiment is bringing it up to a high enough speed where the generator pulls enough energy out where the input is far less.

The input will always exceed the mechanical output--that is a fact.
Every car has a flywheel,but there is always less HP at the wheels than there is at the motor-regardless of flywheel RPM.

We all learn from building stuff, sometimes it's best to see what others have in mind then someone own opinions of how it should work.

Yes,it is always the best way to find out the truth. But remember,many 100s of people have tried this,and all have negative result's. Even science says the flywheel is an energy storing device--not an energy creating device.

I just feel that your time and money would be better spent on your electric bike project--that is an excellent  project--i loved it . But as you say-my thoughts dont really count here--yours do.
So i wish you the best Tom--give it a shot.


Brad

[TommeyLReed]

Tinman,

Are you saying the over 100 experiment with a flywheel design is just like my design and theory, I don't think so.

Most have not even try use my idea, so where does this one make it that same as others?

With my design of controlling input and output with a micro controller would be a far step ahead of what other have done.

I though you did make a claim, but off hand I don't know the details.

If I recall you did post your free energy on this forum, and claim the men in black came to your home.

I don't really know, but maybe you could explain it much better.

;-)

[citfta]

Sorry guys  but neither one of you is totally correct in your assumptions about flywheels.  I have done the exact same testing as Tommey is suggesting using a microprocessor to control the on and off times of the motor and load.  A couple of years ago I spent a few hundred hours working with that setup and adjusting the on and off times and other things to see if I could get more out than I put in.  I found the flywheel extended my run times by quite a bit but I did not see any OU.  So my conclusion was that the flywheel is very useful for making a more efficient system but I never saw more out of the total system than what I put in.  Maybe a larger flywheel would show something different or some other parameter change might make the difference.

Respectfully,
Carroll

[Kator01]

Hello,

look, here is the description of a basic experiment Halold Aspden described in his lecture No 30.

Read carefully and pay attention to some numbers


http://www.haroldaspden.com/lectures/30.htm


Regards

Kator01

[TommeyLReed]

Hi Citfta,

Did you have a oneway  bearing that was able to speed up the flywheel and was able to free spin without moving the motor?

How big was your set up?

Tom...