Is The Earth A Flat Round Disc or Is It a Round Spherical Globe?

[gravityblock]

Do you really think you are fooling anyone with your "new" identity?

Ask Stephan if the IP addresses match!  They won't match, because I haven't assumed a new identity.  I only have one username on this forum.

Gravock

[SeaMonkey]

...what would happen to a plane trying to land on a moving runway...

Navy Aviation Pilots do this routinely.  Very short moving runways
at that.

Even without moving runways landing a commerical jetliner can
be very challenging:

Spectacular cross-wind approaches and landings

More spectacular cross-wind landings

Fortunately, military and airline pilots are versatile and talented.

Navy Air Ops during rough seas.

[gravityblock]

Navy Aviation Pilots do this routinely.  Very short moving runways
at that.

Even without moving runways landing a commerical jetliner can
be very challenging:

Spectacular cross-wind approaches and landings

More spectacular cross-wind landings

Fortunately, military and airline pilots are versatile and talented.

Navy Air Ops during rough seas.

Obviously you didn't watch the video.  A runway that is moving parallel with the plane is not the same as a runway that is moving and changing it's direction relative to the plane, due to the Coriolis effect, as the plane approaches it.  Big difference!  In other words, the Coriolis effect as you know it is fictitious and not real, thus the successful landings, thus a flat earth.  Thank You for proving the flat earth!

Gravock

[TinselKoala]

If the Coriolis effect is real, then it would be impossible for a plane to land on a moving runway. The Flat Earth Documentary - 2016 covers everything you mentioned above, including a simulation of what would happen to a plane trying to land on a moving runway due to the so-called Coriolis effect.

Gravock

Obviously you didn't watch the video.  A runway that is moving parallel with the plane is not the same as a runway that is moving and changing it's direction relative to the plane, due to the Coriolis effect, as the plane approaches it.  Big difference!  In other words, the Coriolis effect as you know it is fictitious and not real, thus the successful landings, thus a flat earth.  Thank You for proving the flat earth!

Thank you for proving once again how idiotic your claims are !

Oh... I forgot to give you your ROFL !!! If you knew anything about aviation you'd know how silly your claims are.

Of course airplanes are affected by the Coriolis effect, but the magnitude of this effect is so small on the scale of aircraft landing/takeoff operations that it is virtually indetectable. Even the slightest crosswind component affects the aircraft more than the Coriolis effect. Try looking up artillery aiming, if you want an example where the CE affects practical outcomes and must be corrected for.

Now look up the Foucault pendulum experiment and explain why the big ones in the Deutches Museum in Munchen, in Paris, at the University of Chicago and elsewhere work as they do.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySBvh8XgyvA


Oh... I forgot... they are all fakes, aren't they.

Come on, tell us another one!

[TinselKoala]

Ask Stephan if the IP addresses match!  They won't match, because I haven't assumed a new identity.  I only have one username on this forum.

Gravock

That post wasn't addressed to you. Not everything is about you, actually.
DR.WHO = ATOMMIX  , very obviously.

And it doesn't matter one bit whether the IP addresses are different or not. Can you spell "proxies" ? Anonymizers?