MH's ideal coil and voltage question

[MileHigh]

So how do we account for the extra electrons in the ideal cap to cap?  I can see how we do it with the inductor, where we cut off the source cap at 7.07v, then let the inductor freewheel electrons from the Pos of the receiving cap to the Neg until it reaches 7.07v.  All say done with super fast timed switching, no diodes..

Mags

Yes Mags, we had that very civil conversation on the the other thread about that and I went over the process in detail.  I described it all to you.

Then subsequent to that your harassed me about some nonsensical foolishness over about a dozen postings.  You made it very clear that you enjoyed doing it too.

I don't know what this sickness is that you have in your head and your heart but it's time for you to stop acting like a jackass harassing idiot towards me.  I endured one full year of that despicable behaviour and I don't want to see any relapses of it any more.

Now, will you post here stating to everyone that this aberrant behaviour from you is going to stop right now?

MileHigh

[Magluvin]

Yes Mags, we had that very civil conversation on the the other thread about that and I went over the process in detail.  I described it all to you.

Then subsequent to that your harassed me about some nonsensical foolishness over about a dozen postings.  You made it very clear that you enjoyed doing it too.

I don't know what this sickness is that you have in your head and your heart but it's time for you to stop acting like a jackass harassing idiot towards me.  I endured one full year of that despicable behaviour and I don't want to see any relapses of it any more.

Now, will you post here stating to everyone that this aberrant behaviour from you is going to stop right now?

MileHigh

Im not here to harass anyone about this. Nor argue. Just talking. If any of what I wrote in the last couple days sounds like im yelling at anyone, or trying to insult anyone, or their intelligence, then turn down your internal volume level when you read my posts. 

Can you please give me a link to that "process in detail" you referred to, or repost it?  Just asking. 

Mags

[Magluvin]

Im not here to harass anyone about this. Nor argue. Just talking. If any of what I wrote in the last couple days sounds like im yelling at anyone, or trying to insult anyone, or their intelligence, then turn down your internal volume level when you read my posts. 

Can you please give me a link to that "process in detail" you referred to, or repost it?  Just asking. 

Mags

The quote you posted from me in your last post refers to using an inductor. That was an example of I understand that result. Worked with that for some time. What Im interested in is the cap to cap electron counts when it comes to ideal and real cap to cap results. That should be consistent with the voltages we end up with in the cap to cap deal.

Mags

Mags

[MileHigh]

Im not here to harass anyone about this. Nor argue. Just talking. If any of what I wrote in the last couple days sounds like im yelling at anyone, or trying to insult anyone, or their intelligence, then turn down your internal volume level when you read my posts. 

Can you please give me a link to that "process in detail" you referred to, or repost it?  Just asking. 

Mags

The process was described on the Joule Thief 101 thread.

Before I try that, I made a mistake and your harassment was also on the Joule Thief 101 thread.

Here is the link for the start of the harassment:

http://overunity.com/8341/joule-thief-101/msg483976/#msg483976

You make two crazy nonsensical arguments and push me and mock me about them:

1)  There is no such thing as an ideal voltage source that can vary in time.
2)  "Prove to me that there is no such thing as an 'ideal' CEMF."

Don't you feel like a fool now in making those arguments?

I get fed up and in post #1262 I say, "That's twelve postings from you on the same subject.  That's harassment."

In post #1263 you reply, "lol.  So now you 'make up' a 12 post rule?  lol. Please post a document that describes that rule exists..   Look at your most recent posts to me. They are just happy happy joy joy? ?   Hypocrite."

You are clearly enjoying doing it.

I will ask you again:

Are you man enough to post here stating that you are not going to harass me any more?

MileHigh

[MileHigh]

Magluvin:

I spent 10 minutes searching both threads but I could not find the original posts.

However, it is easy to restate and you already stated it:  When Cap A is at 7.071 volts a "magic ideal switch" instantly moves the coil so that it is across Cap B only and there is also an ideal diode.  It doesn't matter what value the coil is, the coil will charge Cap B to 7.071 volts and the coil pumps the "missing" electrons to bring Cap B up to 7.071 volts.

We had a very civil conversation about that.

And I am going to repeat to you again that I do not want to be harassed by you and I am requesting that you make a public posting stating that you will not harass me any more.

I do not want to endure another year of torture from you.  Do you understand that?

MileHigh