Free Energy from Electromagnetic Wave Fields

[rakarskiy]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W4fp9J_7-JQ&t=1s

Fuelless power generator in the palm

Translation from Russian: From the description below the video

To any appreciable amount of energy we had to cross the Helmholtz coil Tesla coil.
As a result, an alternative energy source prototype was built for the mobile phone.
The oscillation circuit has a distributed capacitance, so do not need capacitors. Capacitors for trimming system, Baluns, most of these schemes with the exception of.
In order to activate the desired primary pulse generator, but I deliberately refused from the auxiliary power source to the magneto to an auxiliary source of energy is not suspicious.
Тhe electrical circuit removes power from the circuit-switched portions and converts it into direct current.
Free energy generator can operate on different types of loads.
To demonstrate the operation of the generator as a charging device, a standard USB connector is enclosed in charge.
The prototype generates a current of 150 mA at a voltage of 5 volts. If such a generator in order to make a more compact and integrated into a mobile phone or a tablet, it can be used for charging the clock.

[Zephir]

The energy content of wave is proportional to the amplitude squared P ~ E^2. When two waves meet and merge in constructive interference, their amplitude will be doubled, so that their energy will get P ~ E1^2+E2^2+2E1*E2

Thank you Zoltan for your interesting input! But it also means, that if we put a light impulse between two parallel mirrors, i.e. the resonator, then the energy should attenuate itself during each reflection followed with constructive interference ad infinitum. Which is apparently what doesn't happen there.

Analogously, if I would split a laser beam and then merge the wo beams together in phase, then we will have constructive interference everywhere. But if their fields are summed their power is multiplied by 4. How do we get 4 times the energy from merging two beams?

The answer is, the beams are coming in from different directions, if they aren't actually the same beam. That inevitably leads to a mixture of constructive and destructive interference. That means, during constructive interference of two waves the energy gets really amplified in certain direction(s), but it also gets attenuated in another ones, with the overall result obeying conservation of energy.

The skeptics might say that the above determined violations of the energy conservation are valid only locally for that small volume. But since in practical cases it is not possible to satisfy the same conditions for the whole space at the same time, the relative phase relationships would change significantly for different coordinates of the space. Therefore while gaining excess of energy in some places, we would lose the same amount at other places, and if the total energy balance would be calculated for the whole space, then the law of energy conservation would remain valid. This explanation is, however wrong and it can be disproved easily with careful and exact calculations even for practical cases, as Mr. Vajda has done it in his study Energy_From_Wave_Fields_1.2.pdf

Nope, it's (nearly) perfectly correct and it can be demonstrated with simple physical simulations.

[telecom]

Thank you Zoltan for your interesting input! But it also means, that if we put a light impulse between two parallel mirrors, i.e. the resonator, then the energy should attenuate itself during each reflection followed with constructive interference ad infinitum. Which is apparently what doesn't happen there.

Analogously, if I would split a laser beam and then merge the wo beams together in phase, then we will have constructive interference everywhere. But if their fields are summed their power is multiplied by 4. How do we get 4 times the energy from merging two beams?

The answer is, the beams are coming in from different directions, if they aren't actually the same beam. That inevitably leads to a mixture of constructive and destructive interference. That means, during constructive interference of two waves the energy gets really amplified in certain direction(s), but it also gets attenuated in another ones, with the overall result obeying conservation of energy.

Nope, it's (nearly) perfectly correct and it can be demonstrated with simple physical simulations.

Hi, can you please elaborate on how it can be demonstrated?
I don't mind trying this, if its not too  hard.

[telecom]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W4fp9J_7-JQ&t=1s

Fuelless power generator in the palm

Translation from Russian: From the description below the video

I couldn't find the actual description of making this, do you know where?
Thanks

[Zephir]

Hi, can you please elaborate on how it can be demonstrated?
I don't mind trying this, if its not too  hard.

It isn't try this page, for example