Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Latest Bhaskara wheel!

Started by Newton II, July 09, 2016, 01:28:20 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

sm0ky2

Here's something that gives a little bit of credence to this
Almost all gravity machines can be disproved by a simple
"Center of gravity " analysis
When done on these bashkaras they appear to have one
thing in common


When you watch them in action, the center of gravity
is not always below the axis, but forms an ellipse
around the axis, above and below and back above again

I was fixing a shower-rod, slipped and hit my head on the sink. When i came to, that's when i had the idea for the "Flux Capacitor", Which makes Perpetual Motion possible.

gotoluc

Dear sm0ky2,

I do wish you success with your Bhaskara experiments

Kind regards

Luc

Zephir

QuoteAlmost all gravity machines can be disproved by a simple "Center of gravity " analysis
I admit, that the Bhaskara wheel looks more suspicious than for example Rosch' KPP buoyancy system, being closed system. But such an analysis would be difficult even at the case of Bhaskara wheel. It would consider, that the fluid gets displaced exactly in equilibrium with center of gravity and that all droplets and bubbles get formed and disappear just at the moment, when the buyoance force requires to create and coalesce them. At any case, it's just the apparent violation of the classical laws, what makes this device intriguing. We all know, that such a device shouldn't work according to classical physics analysis.

sm0ky2

Classical physics would analyze this as a "closed system"
Since the mass is constrained to the peripheral of the wheel
And is (for the most part) balanced, the lifting and falling
of the weights cancels each other out and you are left with
the moment of inertia of the wheel mass to contend with.


Furthermore it would provide argument that in certain
positions the center of gravity of the wheel is below the
axis. While true, in certain positions the center of gravity
is above the axis, and both could be considered "balanced".




Once in motion, classical physics must abandon this "closed
system" approach. Now gravity is rearranging the fluid mass
Imparting a momentum into the water. (M=mgt) [include slope]
This momentum impacts the wall of the bottles and the
'back slosh' just oscillates (striking nothing).


If you analyze this mathematically, in which direction is the
positive momentum? Is it in the direction of rotation?
Or against the direction of rotation?


It its' magnitude greater than or less than the moment of inertia?


I think the 1 or 2 bottle analysis is going to hammer out these
details. Just as a rigid pendulum helps us understand a wheel.

I was fixing a shower-rod, slipped and hit my head on the sink. When i came to, that's when i had the idea for the "Flux Capacitor", Which makes Perpetual Motion possible.

Zephir

QuoteIf you analyze this mathematically, in which direction is the positive momentum? Is it in the direction of rotation? Or against the direction of rotation?

From perspective of Kozyrev theory the side, which contains more mixed fluid and bubbles should get lighter. From perspective of my own theory, the thermal fluctuations should enforce the keeping mixture in shaken state and thus more distant from center of mass, than the equilibrium, so that this side should get heavier, which is what we essentially observe.