GEM=(Geometrical Electricity Multiplication)

[that_prophet]

Hihi. I'm not satan.
What you learn from childhood is what you think is right. I learned about the bible myself. I was raised i as a Christian. However, what values did I learn? Loving your next unconditionally.

I was raised to not believe in God,,, it was mathematics + logic that brought me to Christ
http://whybornagain.yolasite.com/
http://howlogicchosechrist.yolasite.com/

That is the bottom line.
No need to determine judgement day. If it comes and when it comes, nobody knows. Jesus will come back as unexpected as a lightning from a cloudless blue sky. In what form, how the return appears, nobody knows. Not like a tall man with beard and long hair.

Then why are we assured that we would know when it was near, even at the doors.
He wants us to know how close His Coming is, for our comfort

I never did see your name in the bible. It does not tell about a repeated post at overunity.com. Because the bible was written by man long before internet. How couldn't our allmighty God foresee that? The text is instead inspired by great, and not so great ideas. Not by any God.

My name is in the Bible Code, and all about me,,,
The Bible Code is more proof that His Bible came from God.
It was fulfilled Bible prophecy that convinced me that this was truly the Word of God
http://biblefilescentral.yolasite.com/

[that_prophet]

Yes, Joe, everyone reading here and everyone you have presented this idea to all understand perfectly well what you are trying to say. You don't have to keep repeating the same thing over and over, on thread after thread. WE GET IT.

NO,,, I don't think that you + most others do understand,
The pure simplicity of this pre-school technology being used to multiply AC electricity,
Because you are too easily fooled by the evil spirits lying to you through whispering in your ears,
You listen to this utterly stupid fiction of there being a torque problem,
When torque is only a problem when there is massive current being used, not in this miniscule amount,
This amount of power being generated  is so small that it is barely mentionable,
Think about it, you only need to generate the smallest spark, just enough to crank over a DC motor once,
+ you get 100 rotations of your AC generator to divide it into, that is practically zero, divide by 100
YES,,, apparently I do have to keep repeating it, because you don't seem to understand it, desperately hanging on to this false torque problem

But what YOU don't understand, what you refuse to understand, is that your initial assumptions are FALSE. Hence your scheme will not work. YOU DON'T GET IT.

You are in fact spamming thread after thread, forum after forum, with your FALSE assumptions, which have led you to believe as you do. YOU are the one listening to "demons" !! And you refuse to be helped. There is no hope for you, dear Joe.

Sorry, but what I don't seem to be understanding, is where this false torque is supposedly coming from,
Please explain, what "FALSE assumptions",
+ no, I do not tend to listen to demons, as
I ask Him to prove it was from Him and not evil spirits, trying to be leading me astray
I was not sure if you read it in my http://free-energy.yolasite.com/ website, but very early on, I asked God to prove that this idea was from Him, and not evil spirit leading me astray. That was when He pointed me to His Word, in Ezekiel 1:16 "wheel in the middle of a wheel"

You make further claims without support. "Somebody" has told you he has built three of these things that work. But you offer no proof at all of this utterly _revolutionary_ claim. Why don't you ask that "somebody" what he pays for his electricity to run his home, and let us see his last six months worth of electricity bills.

I know why you don't .... and so do you.

Sorry, but I promised him that I would not give out his name,
As he was worried about the rumors about people that found free energy, were soon found dead

[that_prophet]

Low-Q link

If I remember correctly, you said we should forget about the torque.
Well using a 100cm diameter pulley to run a 1cm diameter pulley, with a regular timing belt for example, will increase the AC voltage 100 times if the generator and the motor are of the same kind. We can agree on that one.

Please listen to this good little bit of sanity here, (instead of evil spiritual lying in your ears)
These mini-pulleys with AC generators are pretty much free running,
As they only gain resistance from turning when they are generating power,
+ the only tiny little bit of power that they need to be generating,
is the one mere spark of current that it takes to rotate the DC motor one single time : (practically 0)
That's all,,, and this mere short burst of current is divided by 100
1/100th of a spark,,, less than nothing, that's why I say torque is in no way a problem,
PLEASE,,,  try to explain to us where all this mythical torque is coming from

What you dont grasp, is that the smallest pulley is attached to an AC generator that also produce 1/100th of the electric current. If the largest pulley require 100 W @ 100 V @ 1 A, the smallest pulley will produce 1000 V @ 0.1 A which happens to be 100W too. Practical experiments has proven this concept since not long after electricity was discovered.

NO!!!   first, I don't think that your equation is valid anyway. You're talking about laws in electronics, and that is only where my theory starts, as I want us to realize that we can also use the laws of pulley mechanics to multiply the amount of power on one side of the equation. 
The large pulley only needs a fraction of the current that you are talking of,
Remember, it is only driving one AC generator, now though pulley mechanics, it is rotating 100 times,
+ what is AC electricity made of,,, but rotations of a coil through a magnetic field.
So,,, we are multiplying any amount of AC electricity that we choose.

I'm afraid you're wrong, and the practical experiments are right.
The industry could not design electric drive mechanisms correctly if your theory were right. The very computer you use to post on this forum would not work if you were right.
We could not send out space probes to monitor the moons of Saturn, or fly by Pluto to take pictures of it and send pictures back to Earth.
The lightning during a thunderstorm would not be there, you food would not exist. You would not be able to see the beautiful sunset every evening. The whole universe would not exist if you were right.

Now I will need you to explain how my theory messes up the laws of physics,
How does my theory mess up electric drive mechs
+ how does my theory mess up how computers work
+ sending out space probes,,,
Please explain your logic, or lack of
How can my theory stop lightening + food from existing,
+ even being able to see a beautiful sunset,
How does my theory make it so the whole universe would not exist
I think that you are just exaggerating a little, no a lot,,,
Because you seeing my logical argument might be starting to win

What is happening in 19 months? Absolutely nothing. The proof will eventually stand right before your eyes that nothing special happens in 19 month.

Within the next 19 months, we are assured that Jesus will return to take his followers before this starts
+ the 7 year peace treaty with Israel will start before this door close,

However, you will still be repeating your posts 2 years from now. Or find something else to post :-) You will be convinced about something very different from what you are convinced about now.
For example, you will be convinced that you have been fooled by your own religion. You will probably become an atheist, and then dig for knowledge that applies to the every day physics. You will finally become sane with your feets still planted on this Earth.

Vidar.

Sorry, but I believe that I will be in Paradise by then, enjoying the wedding feast, while the world experiences hell on earth, at least in the 2nd 3.5 years. No,,, I would not turn against Christianity, as the many fulfilled Bible Prophecies proved it correct for me, especially when it predicted the rebirth of Israel, even down to the exact day..................

[that_prophet]

You gotta hand it to the guy, he has tenacity. You seem very certain.

After my two own ideas this is my 3rd best choice to try.

There is no difference now between the talking crazy, the talking frauds, and the misled.

My best bet is with the crazy guy... Slightly more  .0043 %

Maybe I will try this thing. This pulley thing is my type of thing, another possibility in the flywheel department.

YES,,, PLEASE BUILD MY IDEA,
I think that it is very easy to build,
+ have an even better way of discribing how to build it
-
.      This GEM = (Geometrical Electricity Multiplication) technology is super simple, http://free-energy.yolasite.com/ and is based on basic pulley mechanics. In it, you pay a small amount of DC electricity to rotate a large circumference pulley one single time, (one mere spark of current). Then you run the large amount of moving belt, (many cm of circumference) past a mini-pulley of only one centimeter circumference, giving you many rotations, which you covert into many cycles of AC electricity, by simply adding an AC generator to this mini-pulley. You are using the many cm's of belt that you get off the single rotation of your large circumference pulley + by running this length of belt past a 1 cm circumference pulley, with an AC generator attached, you are gaining a multiple of AC electricity.
-
.     Now, you have just multiplied your single rotation from a single burst of DC current into many cycles of AC electricity. Please don't listen to the mythical torque problem, because there is no torque problem, this is a simple electric motor, which is very easy to rotate. This AC generator is running practically torque free, because all that it has to generate is the single burst of DC current that your DC drive motor takes to make one rotation. And please remember, that you get 100 cycles of AC electricity to generate this single "spark" of DC current to power your drive motor, so this is generating practically zero current, and this small bit of current is divided by 100.
-
.     If you run wires from your AC generator output, + put them into the input of a full wave bridge rectifier,(4 diodes) + then run wires from the DC output of your full wave bridge rectifier, into the input of your DC drive motor, you should have a working mechanism. This perpetual free energy generator mechanism is complete, + you should be able to start it running by merely rotating the large pulley by hand, a quarter turn.
-
.     Please don't listen to the torque problem, as torque is practically non-existent. This AC generator is pretty much free running, as for all of its 100 rotations, it only has to generate one small spark of DC current. That is one small spark of current, that is divided by 100, so you only have to generate 1/100th of a spark of current per rotation, or 1/100th of practically nothing. 
-
.     You must have your AC generator + your DC drive motor of the same voltage.
-
.     This is so simple + cheap to build guys + gals, please build one to prove it works, in any + all voltages
I live in a nursing home, so I cannot even have the simple tools to build this with. This is so dirt simple + easy to build, that Satan is laughing his as? Off, at how gullible we simple humans are. But he will get his just deserts, when Jesus returns in His Glory, before the second door close on 2025.94 = 2019.04(door for rapture+ start of 7 year peace treaty) + 6.9(7 Hebrew years = 2520 days) http://doorschristmustpassthrough.yolasite.com/
-
.     http://free-energy.yolasite.com/ This works because of the simple mathematics of how a large pulley of 100 cm circumference does not cost 100 times more energy to rotate than a 1 cm circumference min-pulley. Yet the 100 cm of belt off of the large pulley can rotate the 1 cm small pulley 100 times, giving you 100 cycles of AC electricity. Now, try to tell me that 1 spark=short burst of DC is equal to 100 cycles of AC electricity. WHY = you have just used pulley mechanics to multiply AC electricity by 100 + if you only add 3 more mini-pulleys to the same belt, you can change your multiplication factor from 100 to 400. NO,,, Don't listen to evil spirits, trying to lie to you about torque problems. There is only torque if you are generating power, and the only power you need to generate is enough power to crank over one extremely small DC motor, and that is divided by 100 rotations. Sorry to destroy your excuse for this perpetual AC electricity generator, but this takes no torque, less than no torque, no torque divided by 100 even..
-
.     So we have less than 19 months to live, on this earth, before all born again followers of Christ, only those who are looking for His Return, will vanish off this earth in the Rapture = "blessed hope"(Titus 2:13) + the signing of the 7 year = 2520 day Peace Treaty with Israel =  http://my2020vision.yolasite.com/ + http://beliefstoliveby.yolasite.com/

Now... If only your could save me time and make a good drawing instead of all this long text.

Ok, how about this diagram, it is close, with 4 mini-pulleys instead of the one in my theory,
+ of course the circumferences are not drawn to scale,
Where the large pulley is not quite drawn right,
+ the mini-pulleys are in no way drawn as small as they should be,
Truthfully, they do not need to be so large, nor do they need to be so small,
This mechanism will work as long as the mini-pulley turns about 10 times as many as the large pulley 

-
This is the best draing that I have,
(sorry, but I cannot seem to get this to allow me post any pictures, please look in reply#197)
I will continue to try to post a new diagram

[that_prophet]

"thereby multiplying your AC electricity"

no multipling frequency .... to power what ?   USA runs on 50hz

I mean that you are multiplying your # of AC cycles or units of electricity
The frequency is not what I happen to be dealing with here,
I have only been dealing with the total amount of cycles,
+ using the free + simple pulley mechanics to multiply the total amount of AC cycles,
Thereby doing the seemingly impossible, + actually multiplying your amount of power,
Which uses the free laws of pulley mechanics, to sidestep the laws of conservation of energy
That states both sides of your equation must be equal

" (the small pulleys do not take any torque to rotate, as they are just winding up massive voltage, as it only needs to generate one spark,(practically zero) of current)= to drive your input DC motor"

DC motors don't run on "sparks"  , is a spark an electrical quantity ?
a spark across a gap is current , practically NOT zero , have you seen commutator bars and brushes after there has been "sparks" ?

I say spark as that is how I was trying to the extremely small amount of current,
That an electric motor/generator takes/produces to do one single rotation
This is an extremely small amount of electrical current,,, the smallest "spark" of current,
For a motor running at 60 hertz, that would last only 1/60th of a second long
= that is why I call it a spark, being only an extremely short amount of time

one_christian_warrior / that_prophet   ,  the devils got ya in the head and you wont wake up

Sorry, but I think that it is all of you that the devils have got you messed in the head,
+ no matter how hard I try, you don't seem to even seem to want to wake up,
You all seem to enjoy this little dream world that evil spirits have you in,,,
HOW CAN YOU CONTINUE TO BELIEVE THAT IT IS SOOOOOOO HARD,
TO ROTATE A SINGLE MOTOR/GENERATOR ONE SINGLE ROTATION.
(these motors/generators are not seized, + are extremely easy to rotate)