THE RANT ROOM

[EMJunkie]

Chris As stated before no one has ever found an OU claim at Overunity research that would survive the separation from the bench power supply ,batteries  ,or closer scrutiny.

always the error has been found .
many times partzman has thought he was onto a gain mechanism which was truly an anomaly [yes did seem to show OU],yet none has survived the ultimate test....An ability to selfrun with no input from external sources.
and still he tries...
your claim from my perspective is truly unique,and yes I absolutely believe there could be many who feel they show aboveunity on the bench.
However a stand alone device should manifest if gain is high enuff [no batteries not connected to equipment or??]and even 1.1 should be able to daisy chain I am told ?

Chet, skepticism is healthy in well defined quantity, anything beyond that quantity it is the opposite, un-healthy! One can never succeed if one has given up before they begin!

It may turn out to be true, that much of what you have been told, may turn out to be Hocus Pocus Chet! Sorry but it is very likely, as those that verbalise with no experience, are simply dangerous!

Partzman has 8 pages on his thread, 105 posts made by Partzman, of 189 posts total, many experiments done, some errors made and found, statistically, the odds are pretty good he has done something right! Now, a logical mind dictates, facts must be looked at:

   1: Partzman's experience.
   2: Partzman's equipment.
   3: Partzman's history of such claims and time before an error was found.


Others with the Same Tech, and their Results, or commonly known as Independent Replications, must also be taken into account!

So, honestly, Statistically, the numbers really do speak for themselves!

You need to be a little more positive Chet! Hope is a very powerful thing when used!

Best wishes, stay safe and well in these dire times,
   Chris Sykes

[ramset]

Chris, Partzman often refers to the 1000 experiments on the path to the Bulb..
he keeps trying...
and I am being very positive about the work you shared ,as noted above,attempts to collate into one simple document for replicators.

[EMJunkie]

It is certain, the most important things are often the most simple, and the most simple things are the easiest to over look!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vo2-Qb3fUYs


A Stationary Magnet (A) can be made to move by placing two Stationary Magnets (B and C) on specific Angles, adjacent to the Initial Stationary Magnet (A)!



Is Charge not just a Magnet? The Electron, having Charge and therefore a Magnetic Moment, thus can be made to move!



Be as skeptical as you wish, I have no desire to twist your arm, I have no desire to convince anyone! I only aim for open minded people to take and use this information as they wish. As so many have already! The Flood Gates of knowledge will turn the Tide!

Best wishes, stay safe and well in these dire times,
   Chris Sykes

[partzman]

There are no "remarkable" claims if one knows what they are doing!

Partzman, Here, has three little coils, and measures Above Unity, in point of fact his last claim was: 1.48

There is nothing special, if one understands what they are looking at and the direction they must head in! Energy is Pumped from Source! Source is the Copper Atom! Magnetic Fields are the only field that can influence the Source, as the Charge, and therefore the Magnetic Moment, are susceptible to an External Influence.

So many before us have not found the result they were looking for, simply because they did not understand the Requirements! In depth study of the Electrical Generator, has been the catalyst for the success we have seen in History, even Clemente Figuera said it:


To many people have been off chasing rainbows! The BS of Cold Electricity, Radiant Energy, and all the other magical BS that so many have in their heads that was planted by the dissinformationalists! Its all LIES! Accept it and move toward Logic, Fact and then you will make progress!

Every success story I have researched, either studied in depth the Electrical Generator, or knew its internal workings very well! Not a single success story has any Magical BS in it!

So, if partzman can make three little coils work, then so can you! I have been showing this for nearly a Decade, many hundreds of success storied have been reported t me. Most are un-willing to share because of your approaches and attitudes here! The Trolls!

Try harder, think harder, focus on Facts! Use Logic! Wipe completely from your minds Fairy Tale Science!

See Partzman's replication of Partnered Output Coils below:

Best wishes, stay safe and well in these dire times,
   Chris

Chris,

Again I remind you that simulation is NOT a replication of your partnered output coils.  Why, because the three coils shown in the sim L1, L2 and L3 are not on a common core.  L1 and L2 are the primary and secondary of transformer T1 and L3 is located on a separate core entirely.  L3 functions as a constant current source for the secondary L2 of T1 and in this manner, little to no lenz is seen by the primary L1 of T1.  This is key to the operation producing OU.

Basically the circuit works likes this: L2 is initially biased at 100ma via L3.  L1 is then ramped up in current from zero until it equals the current in L2 which is held constant by the current source L3.  L3 is much larger than the secondary inductance of L2 so the current is held relatively constant.  When L1 and L2 are equal in current,  the equivalent series inductance of L1 and L2 is now 10.46mH due to K=.8 so the energy in L1 and L2 at ~100ma is considerably greater than the original energy to charge L2 and the ramp up energy of L1.  This is the simple gain mechanism.  It is due to a constant current loaded secondary, not partnered output coils. 

If all three windings L1, L2, and L3 were on the same core, the device would not produce OU.

Regards,
Pm

[gyulasun]

...
To many people have been off chasing rainbows! The BS of Cold Electricity, Radiant Energy, and all the other magical BS 
that so many have in their heads that was planted by the dissinformationalists! Its all LIES! Accept it and move toward
Logic, Fact and then you will make progress!
... 

Hi Chris,   

I agree.    However, if you mean to move toward your Fact, for instance, I am in trouble: I have not found any 
measurement result which would back up your claimed input and output power you referred to in your thread.   
( Input = 12V @ 0.5A = 6 Watts, Output = 17V @ 0.7A = ‭11.9‬Watts, COP = ‭11.9‬Watts / 6 Watts)  = ‭1.98‬. )   

No offense but it should equally be valid for you too that what you say may turn out to be Hocus Pocus, no? 

Make no mistake: I could accept your POC setup may give extra output but I have not seen your proof. 
A bright incandescent lamp is not a proof. Your above numbers are not proof either.   And please do not tell me I should build
it myself to make sure about your claim!  The burden of the proof (COP=1.98) is on the claimer.   
 
Why do not you make a few minute long video with YOUR input - output measurements?   
With the DC input and output voltages and currents, it would be easy, no?   

Gyula