Split Flux Transformer

[lancaIV]

Seaad,

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=1&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20181026&CC=DE&NR=202018004259U1&KC=U1#

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20060112&CC=DE&NR=102004029434A1&KC=A1#
the first compared with the second
is and has by physical process the same base compared to the 5- legs transformator.

The last sentence (!):
http://translationportal.epo.org/emtp/translate/?ACTION=claims-retrieval&COUNTRY=DE&ENGINE=google&FORMAT=docdb&KIND=A1&LOCALE=en_EP&NUMBER=102004029434&OPS=ops.epo.org/3.2&SRCLANG=de&TRGLANG=en

Related [0014]  about the easy- and cheap-ness of a prototype
http://translationportal.epo.org/emtp/translate/?ACTION=description-retrieval&COUNTRY=DE&ENGINE=google&FORMAT=docdb&KIND=U1&LOCALE=en_EP&NUMBER=202018004259&OPS=ops.epo.org/3.2&SRCLANG=de&TRGLANG=en
We are all not in hurry ! BUT SOLUTION IN PROGRESS

Merry Christmas!

OCWL

[seaad]

Exellent lancaIV

The five legged transformer is my choice if I want to "trick"  my house power meter and save me energy money.
Much easier to build than mine, I presume.
My type I+II probably have a need for HV input feeding but gives OU!

A kvick comparisment test (6 kc- 15kc) gives: High (φ) about 85- 86 degrees as patent says. A weak output voltage as my trafos but with lower output-impedance than my trafos (depending of this tranformer lower phase angle, than mine)
Perfomance about 92%. (90- 99% span)
OU not to expect!

Regards Arne

[lancaIV]

I never ex(s)pect OU, but want to get ever an high converter work c.o.p. over 1 !
How to treat and translate/converse electro-magnetism :
a. http://web.archive.org/web/20160316101924/http://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Joe_Flynn%27s_Parallel_Path_Magnetic_Technology_--_by_Tim_Harwood( beside the flux strength augmentation "Losses in the system",  last paragraph)

b. F=BIL and nihilation/ compensation : the B/2B  field strength Volt and Ampere ratio
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=5&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19790215&CC=DE&NR=2733719A1&KC=A1#

[seaad]

Info:
Just a comparison: I made some tests with the "five legged transformer" suggested above and found that I got much better performance with higher frequencies when I used the (Television) HV-transformers.
@10 kHz (80 degrees)  Efficiency In/out =96%, 
@30 kHz (86 degrees) Efficiency In/out =99,7%
With SiFe (normal transformer)  I-laminations clamped together and multi turn coils.
@50 Hz  (78 degrees) Efficiency In/out =39% (with the outmost legs HARD clamped as the rest)
@50 Hz  (70 degrees) Efficiency In/out =70% (with the outmost legs not hard clamped = tiny airgaps)

Regards Arne

[lancaIV]

Info:
Just a comparison: I made some tests with the "five legged transformer" suggested above and found that I got much better performance with higher frequencies when I used the (Television) HV-transformers.
@10 kHz (80 degrees)  Efficiency In/out =96%, 
@30 kHz (86 degrees) Efficiency In/out =99,7%
With SiFe (normal transformer)  I-laminations clamped together and multi turn coils.
@50 Hz  (78 degrees) Efficiency In/out =39% (with the outmost legs HARD clamped as the rest)
@50 Hz  (70 degrees) Efficiency In/out =70% (with the outmost legs not hard clamped = tiny airgaps)

Regards Arne

Congratulations for the technical near-unity stage !Now the input and output variance, also under temperature observationwmbr Ocwl