Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Confirmation of OU devices and claims

Started by tinman, November 10, 2017, 10:53:19 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 16 Guests are viewing this topic.

gyulasun

Vortex1,
Itsu made already a correction on the frequency in his post #349,  line 4. 

Vortex1

Quote from: gyulasun on May 02, 2019, 09:49:39 AM
Vortex1,
Itsu made already a correction on the frequency in his post #349,  line 4.

And so he has. I  apparently missed seeing the correction. I did an edit on my post in that regard. Thank you.

Regards

TinselKoala

Forgive me for asking... but is there some reason you aren't using autoresonating drivers for your transmitters? A phase-locked loop, or an E-field antenna trigger, or even an autoresonating LC tank like a Royer or Mazilli oscillator? It seems rather strange to me to be using a FG for the primary clock, unless there is something really specific about a particular frequency that is being tested -- and if that's the case you should be using a crystal oscillator. If you really start getting good high voltage performance you may find your function generator doesn't like it very much. (By good HV I mean tens of kV at least. A couple kV is child's play when you are talking about Tesla's systems.)
But carry on, have fun. But you might actually like to view my wireless power transmission videos, especially the last few TinselKoil vids. I'm not selling anything!



itsu


I completed the 2th RX and added the gate driver (IXDD614) on the TX, see picture.

With 9V on the driver and tuned to resonance (1.627Mhz now) with the FG (3Vpp pulsed DC 50% duty cycle)
i have the below shown signals see screenshot.

Blue is the input to the gate driver
Purple is the output from the gate driver
Yellow is the signal across the series cap.

I guess some filtering needs to be done.

The tuning with 2 Receivers is already tricky, so let alone with 5.


Itsu


TinselKoala

Heh... at that frequency you are most probably operating in a pure EM mode, so you don't have to worry about "real HV". You may find that you can achieve "supernova mode" close coupling that does not result in a 1/r2 falloff with distance (to a certain limit.) Your receivers seem to be essentially the same as used in my system. The main difference is that I use coils of much lower inductance (and hence less power-wasting in ohmic resistance) and autoresonating drivers, in this case a Royer oscillator:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9x2YfA9LU5s