Confirmation of OU devices and claims

[rickfriedrich]

You invert the real story. You guys are desperate. This is only an information exchange. You can't prove anything here besides your own self-contradictions as we have seen now confirmed again and again. What you are talking about is what Brad did as I have pointed out. I could care less what you guys think or even say. I share this information with those silent readers who are growing by the day. There are about 158,000 views on this thread for a reason.
Speaking of behavior, we have seen these things for many years now with people who refuse to back up anything they say, and who never respond to fundamental questions. This is called fallacy and evasion.

You miss the point. I came here telling you right away that I DON'T EXPECT ANYONE TO BELIEVE MY CLAIMS. Did you read that Monkey? I have repeated this hundreds of times now. So that says a lot about you doesn't it. My point is that people need to prove something to themselves. So notice what you are saying:
"My science is good, it's all of those who question my claims who haven't the ability to see the greatness of what I've accomplished!!  They're bad people who are against Real Science and who are determined to prevent the path to [disproving] overunity being realized by anybody!!"

Do you see the problem with fallacies, they can be self-defeating. All that has been shown here is self-proclaimed disproof claims while people inflate their greatness. I never claimed greatness. There is no need for greatness in this research.
But it is true that people have largely set out to disprove OU. Just read what they are arguing for.

Yeah you need to put your ego aside. That is what I have been arguing from day one.

Truth does speak for itself, but it is a fact that people generally disregard what they know to be true. There is no justification for your statement about OU in this regard. Says who? Also with the next statement. What is and what you want it to be are different things. The statements are foolish.

It is not true that if someone has OU they should know why it works. How many people know how or why a solar panel works? They can have it and know that it is OU.

Then you claim to know all things and everything that has been said or done about OU. Whose ego is inflated here?

It would appear that Rick has dug himself into a hole and is
trying desperately to defend his hole with rash accusations.
It's behavior we see time and time again with those who
claim to have found real overunity.
Matt Jones, Dave Bowlin and now Rick Freidrich are singing
the same refrain which goes something like this:
"My science is good, it's all of those who question
my claims who haven't the ability to see the greatness
of what I've accomplished!!  They're bad people who are
against Real Science and who are determined to prevent
the path to overunity being realized by anybody!!"
If those who are making their premature claims of overunity
would meticulously abide by the Scientific Method in establishing
their "proofs," without letting their egos get in the way, they'd
surely see the folly of what they are doing.
Or, perhaps not.  Those who are deceived often resort to
hostile ugliness to defend their error.
When and if Real Overunity or Free Energy in any electrical
circuit or device is actually discovered, the phenomenon
should speak for itself in Truth.  The Overunity should be
foolproof rather than capricious;  always available rather
than sometimes it happens but usually not.
Those who claim to have found Overunity should be able
to show what its source is, how it is being harvested and
why it works.  So far, this has not been done conclusively
with any claim anywhere.  Apart from the obvious exceptions
of course, such as wind, solar, and water power.
While the free energy able to be made manifest by Daniel
Pomerleau is indeed real, it cannot be explained by Science
as we presently limit it.  It is energy that comes from a place
we are reluctant to consider.  It is being exploited, however,
in Secret Programs with the assistance of certain entities
whose existence is generally denied.
Disclosure is coming but not yet.  One day we will all know.

[a.king21]

Sea Monkey;  You come out of nowhere to attack Rick..
This forced me to read some of your posts.


I would suggest others to do the same.


It is plainly obvious that your knowledge of this subject is lacking and you completely
misunderstand Tesla.
Rick bases his technology on proven patents by Carlos Benitez.
Joining the herd and making baseless accusations may make you feel like you have friends.


Go and look at Benitez's patents and do a critique on them  and tell us where they are
wrong. Then I will take your posts seriously. Up to now your post is a waste of 20 minutes
of my time I'll never get back.

[SeaMonkey]

Perhaps from your perspective it may seem to be an
"attack" but what I've done is focus on behaviors
which can be modified or corrected.

There is certainly nothing wrong with what Rick is
striving to accomplish.  His kits may indeed help
those who are curious to become better acquainted
with the science of electricity and electronics.

Hopefully, those who pursue Overunity or Free Energy
will become intimately aware of the Scientific Method
which strives to find TRUTH and let go of any thoughts
of deceiving the masses for either fun or profit.

Does anyone find it rather strange that those who
are most vocal about having found Overunity or Free
Energy is that they seem to have these things in common:
they're relatively new to the science of electricity and
electronics and are not particularly good at accurate
measurement techniques and not particularly good at
explaining what they believe they have "discovered"
and why it seems to manifest "Free Energy."

The Scientific Method demands that until such time
as replication with instrumented proof of measurement
we should all be skeptical as we seek to comprehend.
We should also be particularly careful to not make any
claims prematurely or in error.

Sadly, most who we see proclaiming that they've found
the secret to Free Energy or Overunity are doing so
very prematurely or with the intent to deceive for either
fun or profit.

Why does it seem that honesty and integrity are
lost in the process for too many proclaimers?

It is plainly obvious that your knowledge of this subject
is lacking and you completely misunderstand Tesla.

I see that you've apparently fallen into that hole too.

As with all things under the sun;  time will tell.

[Mannix]

It would appear that Rick has dug himself into a hole and is
trying desperately to defend his hole with rash accusations.

It's behavior we see time and time again with those who
claim to have found real overunity.

Matt Jones, Dave Bowlin and now Rick Freidrich are singing
the same refrain which goes something like this:

"My science is good, it's all of those who question
my claims who haven't the ability to see the greatness
of what I've accomplished!!  They're bad people who are
against Real Science and who are determined to prevent
the path to overunity being realized by anybody!!"

If those who are making their premature claims of overunity
would meticulously abide by the Scientific Method in establishing
their "proofs," without letting their egos get in the way, they'd
surely see the folly of what they are doing.

Or, perhaps not.  Those who are deceived often resort to
hostile ugliness to defend their error.

When and if Real Overunity or Free Energy in any electrical
circuit or device is actually discovered, the phenomenon
should speak for itself in Truth.  The Overunity should be
foolproof rather than capricious;  always available rather
than sometimes it happens but usually not.

Those who claim to have found Overunity should be able
to show what its source is, how it is being harvested and
why it works.  So far, this has not been done conclusively
with any claim anywhere.  Apart from the obvious exceptions
of course, such as wind, solar, and water power.

While the free energy able to be made manifest by Daniel
Pomerleau is indeed real, it cannot be explained by Science
as we presently limit it.  It is energy that comes from a place
we are reluctant to consider.  It is being exploited, however,
in Secret Programs with the assistance of certain entities
whose existence is generally denied.

Disclosure is coming but not yet.  One day we will all know.

It has been my life experience that this condition existed for many of the seemingly real ones.
It may be that the individuals with this "afliction" cant see it in themselves or lack the ability to scrutinise their own work.

Our child hoods are filled with imaginary figures and many we bring with us .

What is real to one person may be in conceivable to another ,it is a diverse tapestry of ideas and science has more to explain than has been explained, but we are getting there.

The conflict is in the question of why would one make such a claim?

Phsycology?  May take a little more time .

[a.king21]

Mannix and Sea Monkey.  If you go back and read my early posts you will see that I have been promoting Carlos Benitez   many, many years ago.  I have been entirely consistent.  When I realized that Rick was talking the same language and had based his devices on Benitez I recognized the truth.  So I repeat:   Prove Carlos Benitez wrong.  Show me your experiments.


Rick does not have to prove out Benitez.  Right is on his side.  You have to disprove Benitez.


Be my guest.