170 watts in - 1600 watts out - looped - Very impressive build and video

[Jeg]

Hopping that Pierre is reading here:

By watching the output waveform i see that the problem exist three clicks before and three clicks after a pole transition. During this period looks like that the fixed rotor coil with its specific width, accepts both a south and a north to the same coil side and the same time. This is a good reason for oscillation.
Even if you move to four poles the problem is still there during transitions.


Regards

[listener191]

Hi Jeg,

When the pole transition is aligned with the rotor, you would want the N/S poles to fold back through the end of the rotor and not cross through. This would then be the zero cross point of the sinewave.
One of PgmR's simulations shows this happening.

Regards


L192

[shylo]

when a coil is pulsed, and the coil shuts off, the coil produces an opposite field to what it had when it was first pulsed right?
If I pulse it to make a north field ,when I disconnect the supply the field reverses and becomes south ,correct?
The reverse field is what gives us the so called "flyback" ?
Maybe he uses the collapsing field to increase the magnitude of the next propagating field?
Cifta, I agree , but in a transformer the field is stuck in one spot whereas in Pierres' design the field can move, not really sure.
So the core is seeing not only a rotating magnetic field ,but also the flyback strengthing the output of the core?
Along with the flyback, which to me is the reverse magnetic field, this also creates a reverse electrical field is what he stores which in turn replenishes the supply?
Looking forward to Lucs' build since he will break it down step by step.
artv

[TinselKoala]

VIDEO FOR TINSELKOALA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JU5Zvki8tgo

Ah.. so that's where the Free Energy comes from. Thanks, I knew it had to be something like that.

[centraflow]

when a coil is pulsed, and the coil shuts off, the coil produces an opposite field to what it had when it was first pulsed right?
If I pulse it to make a north field ,when I disconnect the supply the field reverses and becomes south ,correct?
The reverse field is what gives us the so called "flyback" ?
Maybe he uses the collapsing field to increase the magnitude of the next propagating field?
Cifta, I agree , but in a transformer the field is stuck in one spot whereas in Pierres' design the field can move, not really sure.
So the core is seeing not only a rotating magnetic field ,but also the flyback strengthing the output of the core?
Along with the flyback, which to me is the reverse magnetic field, this also creates a reverse electrical field is what he stores which in turn replenishes the supply?
Looking forward to Lucs' build since he will break it down step by step.
artv

Hi, I think things are getting very confused.


Letts say you charge a coil and the CURRENT direction is left to right, then when you switch off, the coil will discharge with the current going in the same direction, left to right. The pole will not change, if it charged NS it will discharge NS as he showed a typical boost circuit earlier on. This will happen until the circuit changes the charge direction.


Hope that explains this ok


Regards


Mike