user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU ?

[SwinG]

Hi,
I don't have a lot of knowledge about EE. I spend just one year at EE class, so I got only some really basic understanding.
No matter what, I will try to sum up a bit on what I have red in this thread, and how I understand the working of the TPU. Maybe my limited knowledge could even be an advantage, cause I maybe look at the TPU more "unspoiled", if you know what I mean.

First of all, I can see that this thread is getting more and more about back engineering on the basis of pictures of different kinds of SM's TPU's. But this is not nessesarily a bad thing.
I think there is a natural way of thinking when refining and experimenting with a newly discovered "anomaly" of this nature.
(Come on, get to the point..)
Okay, now.... lets say that you have discovered this effect, whereby you can extract energy from the vacum (ZPE). You have figured out the concept, and have made a setup that prooves the concept.
If you wanted to show this technology to investors, or other people of interest, you would like to show that this TECHNOLOGY (and not DEVICE) can be used for a wide variety of applications. You would like to show a compact device, that lits a bulb. A more powerfull device, to power inductive loads like powerdrill and TV, and off cause you would like to show a bigger device that puts out hundreds of watts and lights several light bulbs. This does not nessesarily mean that the compact device could power even a transister radio, or that the most powerfull device could power a TV.
What I bascically mean is, that maybee the different TPU's are all build a little different. They are all build on a commen basic princip, but this princip could be expressed in a variaty of constellations concerning number of coils, number of windings, passive components and control circuitry. Each device would be a variant of the initial working device with modifications applied from experimenting and refining, to optain the specified goal.
So there is no ONE magic wonder device, but SEVERAL. Although they would all be labled as TPU's.

[otto]

Hello all,

just a quick question: has anybody tried with bifilar or trifilar wound control coils???

Otto

[Gearhead]

Hi Otto

It does seem that a trifilar winding could provide multiple frequency excitation with a means for collection.

I read JM's parables and he does talk about parrallel conductors quite a bit.

[tomas]

HI all,

I don't dont analysing the big one is a good idea!  The big one is one of the very last models and has loads of extra control circuitry making it harder to back engineer.  I think that it's human nature after seeing the small models and thinking wow they are so small and there is nothing to them, but still I cant work out how it works so I will default to something I can try and anaylse being the big one with all the extra parts!  But this just makes it more complex on you!


D.

hi mister D 

i think you are right about that so can we discuss the open tpu?
i added an image of how i think it might work.
there are two capacitors and two diodes which are charged up by aplying pused high voltage onto the upper coil (charge principle up ramping Avramenko's)

the capacitors discharge abrubtly and as real induction into the sytem and the output is on bottom coil.

T

[int25]

Hello,

just one interposed question:

is there anyone, who testified proof of SM's devices?
Or serious overunity-results of any replication?

I don't state, there's not, but a video gives no proof.

An additional stumbling block is the vanishing of SM.
Also I doubt, if it's worth relying on people, that don't lay out their concept and/or try to make much money with inventions like this by selling it to investors.
Many try this and than vanish, mostly closing down the hope of benefitting the world by their original results.

Isn't it better to follow Tom Bearden and the MEG-path?

Or did somone already achieved positive OU-results with SM's devices?

int25 .