Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU ?

Started by turbo, November 29, 2006, 04:13:49 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 21 Guests are viewing this topic.

mkt3920

Grumpy,
I assume you are referring to amplification of input pulses via the radiant effect, but not the TPU's final effect, which sounds like superconductive magnetic resonance done with natures rf?  ie., I don't think anyone is going to get the "explosive" (or implosive) effect unless the control coils are wound a certain way and the frequencies are found.
Kent

Groundloop


aether22

Well I agree, SM has not IMO given enough info for someone to be too likely to replicate his work, which is why my interest was minimal until I saw this thread.

Turbo sure hasn't, Dave hasn't answered as to if he faked it or not and much the same with Otto.
If those two have had success we are very close, if not then we are effectively nowhere.

However that's not quite true, there are lots of other devices out there many similar to the SM device, and IMO if we looked at the common features and got a sense of the underlying principles behind these devices, know what 'tricks' they use to do what they do we could put all these devices together ourselves. (rather than needing to copy a device we could design our own in much the same way we can design an electric motor)

There are PLENTY of AG & FE  devices out there, and more all the time, what is lacking is an understanding of how they work, not more devices.

The only way this is going to stop being 'magic' and begin being science is when people are ready to put a bit more effort into understanding how these technologies work.

One thing I'd like clarified, do we know in SM had his collector coil at 90 degrees to the controller coil as Dave has?
And did SM claim that the DC output was not merely rectified somehow? (because these two things are impossible for anything like normal induction)

Obviously if your going to think about how the SM device works you have to consider the nature of the aether vortex and gyroscopic effects this device has, actually that's what attracts me to this technology.

?To forgive is to set a prisoner free and then discover that the prisoner was you.?  Lewis Smedes

Groundloop


MeggerMan

Hi Alex,
Yes, Turbo's experiment was false and so was Dave's, although to be fair Dave did say it was not over-unity and only done to encourage others to try the experiment.
Otto, I'm not so sure about, he does sound genuine and appears to be having genuine problems.
I think you need to take the failures you have had and put them behind you and plod on.
Otto mentioned in his last post about sync'ing the three oscillators in time, that would mean some kind common multiple of frequency for the three frequencies.
To achieve this means using a master oscillator and then three divide by n circuits.

This is probably a stupid question, but have you checked that when your oscillators are coupled to the coils they are actually oscillating?
If you have the sort of current being used that you mentioned then it might be the oscillators are failing to pulse correctly or stalling each other during the "On" cycle.
Can I suggest that you drive the oscillator from a seperate supply to avoid this issue.
Let us know how your testing continues.

Regards

Rob