High Power solid state from NASA

[abbhawk]

NASA got diffrent energy devices (patents) that they will allow american to produce, thought maybe someone like this High power solid state patent?

https://technology.nasa.gov/patent/MFS-TOPS-29

It is a part of NASA techmology transfer program

[Sergh]

This is RF Power Amplifier, and this "News" not too new..

DIY RF PA 1000 W and not only

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZQHlAyLczQ

http://www.w6pql.com/1kw_70cm_ldmos_amplifier.htm

It's not NASA, but the power and frequency are almost equal:

http://www.w6pql.com/1kw_222mhz_ldmos_amplifier.htm

[sm0ky2]

The simplicity and robustness of the NASA design is intriguing
It can probably be scaled and tuned to any desire.


The 1kW is multiplied in current
and divided in time


We should be able to do the same with 10W, or 1W


1/4R



(ok, ok,... 1/R+1/R+1/R+1/R)
it gets annoying after 30 or 40 or so....

[abbhawk]

Sergh, i didnt post this because it was supposed to be new knowledge, but because NASA got the patent since 2007 and had no intentions of using patent. Now (this is the new part) Trump have ordered NASA to release 1000 patents for use by american companies so they can create jobs.

I mention in here for two main reasons.

1) i think some of you like to know what patents is made, and if NASA got patents on high power over unity systems, then it must be proven by authorities that overunity is a reality. Then it IS a question of choosing a way to make free energy and fact is, that NASA have proven that they hold back overunity/free energy devices from the public. But none dare to ask why NASA didnt tell the truth past 10 years and only do it when ordered!

2) It is new that NASA seek partners that will buy license to produce overunity device, and i thought maybe someone in here is american and like to become producer of these devices.

We that use a board like overunity can avoid alot of fraud/scam insinuations against what we do when it is proven by NASA patents that we tell truth as good as we can.

You might not see it as a big deal, but try take a look on all 1000 (not all released yet) patents that NASA will realease, how many of these contain info that is new knowledge to majority, like efficient ways to energy. Do you think NASA release all their best patents, or do they release those they do not need anymore? So the 5000 patents they dont want us to know about, what kind of info do they contain?

Just one little weird thing - i thought none could get patents on free energy - not really sure what the claim is in this patent.

[Sergh]

A conventional amplifier does not increase energy, but converts, for example, DC energy into energy of high-frequency oscillations depending on the signal at the input. The same "amplifier" can be called a hydraulic drive or audio sound amplifier.

NASA ... as I understand it, NASA is going through hard times now.
And the patents are of little use, they have not written the truth in patents for a long time.
If NASA had free energy, then they would not have such problems with a lack of electrical energy, like here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_13_(film)

It is interesting to learn from NASA what happened with Podkletnov's experiments on shielding gravity by superconductors.