12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

[bsrinon]

Hey Sam,

That probably wouldn't be the most efficient or easest way of doing it. I would prefer glueing neo magnets on the wheel and then have stationary air core pickup coils around the wheel, with the space between the magnet face and the coil end as close to each other as possible.  In this setup, you don't have to worry about commutating the output of the coils wrapped around the wheel, as you would if the coils were on the wheel.

Here's a setup that might work (I don't think this setup has aircore coils):

http://freeenergynews.com/Directory/Inventors/JohnBedini/SG/Feb2005/images/Bedini_Feb2005_big_guy.jpg

A toroidal coil would give more power if the magnets were moving inside the toroidal tube. But that would be hard to make.

Brian

hey everyone,

how much power could we generate if we wrapped a coil around the bicycle wheel,  as in brian's design, and then placed fixed permanent magnets at various points around the wheel?  i wonder if the toroidal coil will give us more power?  just my stupid thought of the day stuck out here on the road.

lol
sam

[supersam]

@ brian,

great pickup on bedini, i wouldn't have thought of that for a ten dollar bill!  there are afterall ring magnets aren't there.  that sounds great.  with your setup there are lots of ways to go.  have you looked at milkovic's patent idea's? iknow i can't read them but as they say a picture is worth a thousand words.

lol
sam

[Dingus Mungus]

http://world.honda.com/ASIMO/

better chance of this guy beating us all at a game of touch footbal

http://world.honda.com/HDTV/ASIMO/New-ASIMO-run-6kmh/
4 miles per hour is just fast enough to lose me...
(I only run when chased)

~Dingus

[supersam]

hey  dingus,

i think bill mehess, is scheduled to release all his info and demo video on christmas morning.  can you post some pictures or video of the results you have gotten with the bicycle setup?  that would be great!! i still can't understand why it will not work maybe you can enlighten us.  or maybe we can help you to figure out why.  either way bill's idea with winding a spring to keep the pendulum moving may make or break the idea of closing the loop.  however if you take a look at milkovic's patents i think you might find it has already been done.

lol
sam

[Dingus Mungus]

A level mercury switch on the pendulum should be able to make a connection any time it is level... Also you could tie in a secondary switch to make sure the pendulum was only assisted when the lever was at a certain point along its path.

As for the extraction of energy from this set up:
I have made 50+ simulations only 2 of them showed violations of the first law. The only thing those two configurations had in common was the fact that the x plane velocity of the pendulum match that of a control group pendulum. I would suggest every one experiment with two pendulums at all times. One on the lever and the other stationary. If you can get them to match pace and phase only then you have began to scatch the surface of this device. I will try to post more sim data but I would advise others to just start working in WM2D with the two pendulum concept as to demonstrate the kinetic energy gain and the configuration it was found in.

Good luck to all,
~Dingus