12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

[Omnibus]

No, that analogy is incorrect. Your grandfather's clock is the disc with weight secured at the rim. Winding it will get you that much ticking. However, if you use the advanced clock (no analogy in the clock world yet) which is the pendulum enhanced disc you'll get three days more of work for the same winding. This is more of a likely analogy.

[Bubba1]

In this case you obviously don't.

Yes, you do.  You just don't see it.

[Bubba1]

In the case of the weight on the rim, the weight must travel up to the original height for the wheel to make a full turn.  In the case of the lever, the weight only has to travel up to the original height, minus the length of the lever.  If the wheel height is 50 inches, the weight on the rim must travel back up to 50 inches for the wheel to make a full turn.  The weight on a 5 inch lever, however, only must travel back up to 45 inches.  Which one takes less energy?

[Omnibus]

No, it will not descend to different levels. Like I said, you can adjust the experiment in such a way as to have the same heights in both cases. I said that already.

Aksi, you may play with different heights in both cases -- then weight at the rim case having shorter height than the lever case and vice versa. In all cases you'll observe almost three turns in the lever case versus the rim case.

So, take what the vid shows as the beginning of your exploration and adjust heights to match (to avoid the subtraction of the lever arm) and you'll get the same discrepancy.

[Omnibus]

I will carry out an experiment sometime this or next month and will make a video to demonstrate this important instance of CoE violation.