12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

[MarkE]

No sir Agent Smith, I am completely unaware of Mr. Jonson's Involvement, nor why the United States would emplore an out of work salesman with a spinning coffee-table, to build advance jet engines, no sir.

I have know knowledge his teachings, the technology or the potential uses, thereof........

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6F9I5OiSTE

It's really a shame that the rolling axle never makes it back around to the gate input.  Why do you think that is?  Do you think that it is because the axle ending position as shown is at a lower energy potential than at the start?  Well, Mr. Anderson?

[sm0ky2]

It's really a shame that the rolling axle never makes it back around to the gate input.  Why do you think that is?  Do you think that it is because the axle ending position as shown is at a lower energy potential than at the start?  Well, Mr. Anderson?

Theres a few H J threads for that, its a little off topic. It can be made to enter into another gate, or loop back unto itself.
That video demonstrates the driving principal in its most basic form. The entrance of the field is modified to reduce repulsion at the front of the gate. "PE" with respect to the magnetic field only defines a point to point relationship within that field, not necessarily the kinetic energy of the path it took to get to that point. In an asymmetrical field these can be two greatly different values.

[MarkE]

Theres a few H J threads for that, its a little off topic. It can be made to enter into another gate, or loop back unto itself.

AFAIK  HJ was never able to get his devices to complete a loop.  If he had succeeded then OU would be here. 

That video demonstrates the driving principal in its most basic form. The entrance of the field is modified to reduce repulsion at the front of the gate. "PE" with respect to the magnetic field only defines a point to point relationship within that field,

Yes, that's what a gradient does.

not necessarily the kinetic energy of the path it took to get to that point.

Paths have nergy potentials.  Kinetic energy is energy of motion.  The term has no meaning in the sense of potential energies in a field.

In an asymmetrical field these can be two greatly different values.

If by asymmetrical field you mean a non-conservative field:  IE a field where the path taken from a starting point back to that same point can result in energy gain or loss, then the problem you have is establishing a static magnetic field that is non-conservative.  That is what Steorn claimed to do and completely failed to demonstrate.

[TinselKoala]

Theres a few H J threads for that, its a little off topic. It can be made to enter into another gate, or loop back unto itself.
(snip)

Go ahead then, show it made to "loop back unto itself" and continue to operate on its own.

It's simple enough, isn't it? Then why don't you do it?

I know why, and so do you. No arrangement of permanent magnet "gates" adds any energy. Go ahead, prove me wrong! You cannot.

[sm0ky2]

 
i don't want to flood this thread with arguments about a completely different device,
we can go to the H J threads and talk pages about it, but this one is for double pendulum. ^^