Posting an open source device for free to the world.

[MagnaProp]

Might there be a SAFE way to profit from a perpetual motion device without meeting your maker in the process?  If so, step by step info would help.   PLEASE NOTE: I have not succeeded yet.

Sure. Market you device as highly efficient, not perpetual. Let your clients find out for themselves that the device they purchased works for ever. When they see that your device doesn't stop so be it. Tell them you knew it was efficient and marketed it as such.

[Belfior]

Sure. Market you device as highly efficient, not perpetual. Let your clients find out for themselves that the device they purchased works for ever. When they see that your device doesn't stop so be it. Tell them you knew it was efficient and marketed it as such.

These devices seem to take 9-12V DC to start. Just put a solar panel on it and say it is a solar power generator. It will run self sufficient after it has started, but you can say it is a solar generator

[ramset]

Smoky
quote

Placing a device into commercial use makes it ineligible for patent
under U.S. patent law.
end quote

do you have more "legaleeeze/info on this?
and what it would look like here?
so as to be rock solid against theft from Lurkers...

sorry I don't understand this

[Belfior]

Smoky
quote

Placing a device into commercial use makes it ineligible for patent
under U.S. patent law.
end quote

do you have more "legaleeeze/info on this?
and what it would look like here?
so as to be rock solid against theft from Lurkers...

sorry I don't understand this

chapter 13 from http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/patent_policy/en/scp_20/scp_20_3.pdf

http://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/doc_details.jsp?doc_id=256317

[lancaIV]

When I studied more than 20 years before the international magnetic field research and development results I also studied the patent archive documents and saw there also this document,which internal description disclosed a gate to Fin<Fout:
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?FT=D&date=19790215&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP&CC=DE&NR=2733719A1&KC=A1&ND=4#

http://translationportal.epo.org/emtp/translate/?ACTION=description-retrieval&COUNTRY=DE&ENGINE=google&FORMAT=docdb&KIND=A1&LOCALE=en_EP&NUMBER=2733719&OPS=ops.epo.org/3.2&SRCLANG=de&TRGLANG=en

If in a conventional generator the field strength B, the length of its conductors is denoted by L and the current flowing through by I, the magnitude of the counterforce F exerted on the conductor and thus on the shaft is F = BLI.

If the field strength of the electrical device 2B, the length of its conductor is L and only flows through a current whose magnitude corresponds to half of the current flowing in the generator, the force exerted on the armature F '= 2B x L x 1 = LI. 2
This shows that the force exerted on the armature of the electrical device and thus on the driving shaft is equal to the counterforce exerted on the shaft by the conventional generator. The force is generated to act in such a direction as to compensate for the counterforce. A slightly stronger current flow provides the required torque at the shaft. Therefore, the shaft and thus the armature are moved and generate electrical energy.

To let this half current flow through the electrical device, half of the generator voltage is required. Thus 1/4 of the power generated is lost to counteract the deceleration force. The remaining 3/4 of the energy produced or a little less of it is available for external consume.

This technical disclosure about actio/reactio force treatment shows the OU-effect.
                       Newton/Newtonmeter inside : Force-Energy-Work