Kapanadze and other FE discussion

[Sergh]

AGAIN WHY KAPA USED A COPPER PIPE AS HIS PRIMARY OF HIS TESLA COIL? WHY NOT JUST A THICK
WIRE . REASON THE SECRET IS WHAT IS IN THAT COPPER PIPE. INERT CONDUCTIVE GAS. IT HAS DO WITH
THE CAVITY RESONANCE OF THE GAS AND SKIN EFFECT. TESLA HIMSELF CONCLUDED THAT CERTAIN
CONDUCTIVE GAS AT LOW PRESSURE IS VERY LOW RESISTIVE TO HIGH FREQUENCY CURRENT.

Even the use of now common superconductors does not provide any additional energy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2jmNBjjAmE

https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Superconducting-Cost-Effective-Multipurpose-Superconducting-Niobium_1600669324001.html

1. Wires do not create energy on their own.

2. Wires do not create more energy than these wires receive from the outside in any way.

3. A magnetic field cannot produce more energy than it takes to create or manipulate it.

[rakarskiy]

Even the use of now common superconductors does not provide any additional energy.
...............
3. A magnetic field cannot produce more energy than it takes to create or manipulate it.

A conductor is not a source by itself. If a conductor is placed in a zone where a electric field with potential difference is polarized on its surface, this piece of conductor is already a source with electric field strength, when it is closed in the circuit of an electric circuit, the electric potential field will pass to the state of vortex field which is discharged, current is a kind of reverse action. Polarization of a conductor in an electric field, the same action takes place in the winding of a generator with wires embedded in a slot. The transformer window already has the electric field of the primary circuit. That's why a transformer is not a generator.

The magnetic field in the core is formed with a much greater amplification of its strength in relation to the magnetic strength of the field coil. Generators work on this property, but transformers do not work.

https://rakatskiy.blogspot.com/2022/06/magnetization-of-steel-magnetic.html

[Sergh]

If a conductor is placed in a zone where a electric field with potential difference is polarized on its surface, this piece of conductor is already a source with electric field strength, when it is closed in the circuit of an electric circuit, the electric potential field will pass to the state of vortex field which is discharged, current is a kind of reverse action.

No, it doesn't work. What you described is called Electrostatic induction:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrostatic_induction

Doesn't work because it affects EVERYTHING. And on your wires from the multimeter and on any other conductors. It is impossible to use electrostatic induction to generate additional energy.

[rakarskiy]

No, it doesn't work. What you described is called Electrostatic induction:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrostatic_induction

Doesn't work because it affects EVERYTHING. And on your wires from the multimeter and on any other conductors. It is impossible to use electrostatic induction to generate additional energy.

Polarization itself is not yet a source for a complete source that can be included in a circuit with a load, you need to create the conditions for it! You cannot even charge a simple capacitor from atmospheric electricity in sufficient power without creating the necessary conditions for it. That is why the Kapanadze converter fulfills this condition. 

Although we know one device that lights bulbs when the conductor is polarized.

In "electricity" there is no additional energy, there is potential energy. in the form of "electric field potential difference" and there is Discharge energy. expressed in the power of the electromagnetic field in the circuit P=UI, for a generator Pg=1/2EI (P=UI) = (Pg=1/2EI)

[Sergh]

The magnetic field in the core is formed with a much greater amplification of its strength in relation to the magnetic strength of the field coil.

the induced electromotive force in any closed circuit is equal to the rate of change of the magnetic flux enclosed by the circuit

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_induction
Much greater amplification of its strength, but much more energy expended. The result is the same:

3. A magnetic field cannot produce more energy than it takes to create or manipulate it.

Although we know one device that lights bulbs when the conductor is polarized.

No, this is another ordinary things.
There is a 180 degree bend in the picture. It has inductance. Consider that this is not a short circuit, but a high-frequency choke between the leads of the bulbs.