Kapanadze and other FE discussion

[Belfior]

Belfior
We should understand that the stuff that moves along a conductor is free electrons. The free electrons move about randomly until they feel an electro-motive-force which compels them to move along the conductor which we call an electric current. So to say a capacitor was charged with no current involved is to imply the capacitor was charged with electrons which never moved to charge the capacitor. Whenever an electron moves in any way this motion is considered an electric current, a current is motion.

Thx for the site. I will read it.

Is it free electrons? Are there electrons? Do they move or are they in one spot as mass and their spin or other properties change, so that we interpret that as current or moving electrons? Is the energy actually outside the wire?

So are you actually telling it like it is, or are you telling me something that "was agreed on", which is a different thing?

Energy stored in a cap is CV^2/2. This tells me that current is no factor in that equation. So if the cap needs current to charge it means it has internal resistance. If current is needed it would be a factor in the equation. So obviously we don't have ideal capacitors, but what if you neutralize that resistance by using a resonant LC tank? How much charge can you get with just a HV source into that cap when in resonance? That charge will equal amps when you pull it out on the load side. If you get more charge into that cap than the load pulls then you can self loop.

I have seen lecturers take part capacitors. Grounding and connecting the plates together and rebuilding the cap. Once again the cap sparks when the plates are connected. So the charge was in the dielectric and not in the plates. So the "free electrons" were moved by current from +-plates to the glass dielectric?

From amasci site:

"What is electricity? This question is impossible to answer because the word "Electricity" has several contradictory meanings. These different meanings are incompatible, and the contradictions confuse everyone. If you don't understand electricity, you're not alone. Even teachers, engineers, and scientists have a hard time grasping the concept.

Obviously "electricity" cannot be several different things at the same time. Unfortunately we've defined the word Electricity in a crazy way. Because the word lacks one distinct meaning, we can never pin down the nature of electricity. In the end we're forced to declare that there's no such stuff as "electricity" at all! Here's a quick example to illustrate the problem."

So the problem with electricity seems to be that nobody understands it?

That is why I read the forums and read mostly the stuff that the crazy people write. Because we have been asking the wrong questions for about a hundred years now. Any breakthrough will come from the fringe areas if there is anything there to find. That unfortunately means that you go through a lot of bullshit, but every now and then you find a guy that has new ideas. Then you try to replicate and reproduce the effects.

[SolarLab]

F.Y.I.

O.T. ?  Fun - Food for Thought - or a little of both 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXeXcbvBPJw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9b0J29OzAU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1MDOerruD
[Ver 2. outside of coil - battery/magnets => rotate]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yL0TRmprhEM

Theory of operation - analysis!

FIN

[Thaelin]

At least those work when you build them. 

[Void]

Hi Belfior. To say it as nicely as it can be said, the problem is you have no idea what you are talking about.
I would suggest doing actual experiments first so you can learn how things actually work in reality, then if
you eventually find something interesting in actual bench tests, you can then post about it here if you like.

[iflewmyown]

Patented,  ?   9564268
Garry