IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?

[George1]

Hi nix85,
1) Thanks a lot for your enthusiasm! And thanks a lot for the interesting texts and links that you have sent to me. Please give me some time to consider them carefully.
2) Did you carry out in your garage the simple experiments described in the link below?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY&ab_channel=PeterAxe
Looking forward to your answer.       

[George1]

EXPERIMENTALLY PROVED reactionless drive and perpetual motion are described in the link below:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY&ab_channel=PeterAxe
The link above describes a few simple reactionless drive and perpetual motion experiments. You can easily carry out these simple experiments in your garage as many times as you want.
Looking forward to your comments.

[nix85]

you're welcome. i watched your vid but have not tried it
not sure why you expect propulsion that way
if you tried it i'd love to see a vid

[George1]

To nix85.
--------------------------
The experiments described in the link manifest (1) a violation of the law of coservation of linear momentum and (2) a violation of the law of coservation of mechanical energy. These two violations can be used as a basis for design and construction of a simple reactionless drive device. THIS IS EVIDENT! (And I am even slightly surprised by your question "....why you expect propulsion that way....")
Looking forward to your answer.
 

[nix85]

i am surprized that you are surprized
there is no reason that design should produce linear thrust
if you think it should explain it clearly

more so, there is no simpler design for inertial propulsion
than rotation of unbalanced mass
as i described already so many times

here is a pracital example of linear acceleration
by keeping oscillation on one side

https://youtu.be/bReKEKpoyjo

can your device do this?
i'd love to see it