IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?

[Floor]

To nix85.
---------------------------
My respect to your enthusiam and diligence! This is the way for pushing forward the technology progress!
Regards,

Yes ! I agree !

[George1]

Please look again at our post of May 16, 2021, 12:46:56 PM.
----------------------------------------
1) 0.1 kg.m/s = 0.1 kg.m/s. The last equality shows the validity of the law of conservation of linear momentum in this particular case.
2) 0.005 J > 0.002 J. The last inequality shows the invalidity of the law of mechanical energy in this particular case.
3) Modern (and even not so modern) technologies allow reducing of friction to a certain value/limit, beyond which the experimental error (due to friction) becomes negligible (less than 1 %).
----------------------------------------
Looking forward to your comments.

[nix85]

Thank you both.

Yesterday i figured my idea with springs is flawed for the reason
i suspected.

If you have two balls on arms joined at a pivot and you got a spring
connecting two balls, balls are gonna clash together in a straight line
pushing the pivot downward.

Guy who built it said it jumped in the air but then bounced back down.
So obviously there is centrifugal pull but also this effect canceling it.

Springs were just an idea to simplify demonstration of the basic principle
which stands perfectly.

Basic principle, again, refers to accelerating/decelerating counterrotating
unbalanced masses on the axis.

[George1]

To nix85.
--------------------------
This rotation-based principle obviously has many variations. 

[George1]

The text below is a copy of our post of May 17, 2021, 03:38:48 PM.   
----------------------------------------
1) 0.1 kg.m/s = 0.1 kg.m/s. The last equality shows the validity of the law of conservation of linear momentum in this particular case.
2) 0.005 J > 0.002 J. The last inequality shows the invalidity of the law of conservation of mechanical energy in this particular case.
3) Modern (and even not so modern) technologies allow reducing of friction to a certain value/limit, beyond which the experimental error (due to friction) becomes negligible (less than 1 %).
----------------------------------------
Looking forward to your comments.