What to do when you have a Free Energy machine

[dan]

in section 7 of the "what to do..." you mentioned swap meets. a 'hamfest' meet for ham radio may be a good place. many of these people have all of the equipment and skills to build a machine/device. and they are connected world-wide with interactive audio/video/code 'contacts' with all other hams (skilled builders) in all countries.

[TechStuf]

To the successful researcher.....don't be tempted to shoot for the moon.? Be content to make use of the 'smaller influence' if needs be.? If 'it' works....it works.?

No need to get too ambitious with scale and power issues.....and waste valuable time.? In this 'game', the old addage: "The firstest with the mostest" need not apply.

Simple and readily duplicated POC (proof of concept) models sitting in the right corners, would be enough to unravel the 'anchor stitch' on that 'moth riddled', Iron curtain.



Peace,

TS

[raburgeson]

Guys don't forget peer 2 peer they can help too, and there are 3 or 4 sites that save records
of closed sites.Contact them just in case you do get closed. (foriegn sites first)

[Charlie Brown ARN]

My additional comments here are that demonstrations should be made highly believable. A short term demonstration scheduled at a definite time has the weakness of allowing falsification with hidden batteries. I think someone did this with a lithium battery hidden inside a torroidial transformer core. I am thinking of making a batch of demonstrators containing a clock, LED light bank, and small water pump for a small two - water - reserve - and - a - waterfall exhibit in a small sealed transparent box left for continuous long term observation when my first ambient heat recycling chips are made. The water circulation will be assurance that the device does not run off a gross temperature difference. The system must be sterile so the pump won't foul and the water will stay transparent. Having several simultaneous exhibits will be safer and better.

For financing, I am considering asking that money be contributed to application developers without passing through my hands first.? They will raise the money they need, spend it primarily on starting a business based on the diode array and pay me a small royalty based on the well definable % of gross. I have profited by my contribution to world science and not used the inventing talent as an excuse to get in the way of business people that have their talents. I intend to add the condition that they not be secretive, which may be tricky to define. Secrets should regress in a world of many producers. I have ideas on cheap, fast, simple nanofabrication equipment which will be part of the diode array becoming cheaper better and more adaptable.

As to steering the uses of the diode array we should talk about the social consequences in many conversations. I started the post Beyond ambient heat transforming device prototypes with the presumption that ambient heat recycling machines are the most revolutionary because they are extraamly scalable and adaptible and highly invarient on the environment leading to their being highly autonomous and ubiquitous.

Aloha,

Charlie

[PaulLowrance]

A short term demonstration scheduled at a definite time has the weakness of allowing falsification with hidden batteries.

That's a good point.  The inventor could say, "with the best technology to date, and assuming there were batteries stuffed inside all these parts, that there would be enough energy to generate 5000 watts for 1 minutes."  I did a little research and found the following data:

Density of Lithium is 0.53g/cm3

energy density  of various batteries
-----------------------------
Lithium ? 0.150 kWh/kg
button ? 0.125 kWh/kg
dry cell ? 0.09 kWh/kg
lead-acid ? 0.03 to 0.04 kWh/kg

It seems that Lithium has the highest energy density at 0.150 KWH/Kg.  Let's say the total density of all the parts together in the invention amounted to 10cm x 10cm x 10cm, then that's 1000 cm3.  So that's 530g or 0.53 Kg.  That amounts to 0.0795 KWh, which is enough energy to generate 79.5 watts for one hour, or 5000 watts for 0.954 minutes.  So if such a free energy machine could generate 5000 watts for over 1 minute then that proves there are no batteries.

Additionally, it is possible to use fuel such as hydrogen as a source of power, which holds a lot more energy.  The inventor could seal the entire machine in an airtight clear plastic bag to demonstrate that no gas is forming since all fuel technology gives off gas.

Sincerely,
Paul