Finally! A health study of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated children

[Temporal Visitor]

Well, maybe I can pull a few heart strings...

They do the same thing to your pets.  And your pets suffer and die prematurely because of your actions.  You do it because you have to right?  Your pet has to be legal right?  Has to have all its shots?

Like children, your pets rely on you to do things in their best interest.

So take ownership of that responsibility and use a little discernment.  The excuse, "The devil made me do it!" isn't going to fly.

Presuming there are still hearts beating that can recognize they are enjoying "the privilege of existence" that came from "the maker of rules" I'll hope those strings are pulled.

"They" meaning those that choose to ignore the reality of being natural individuals, (men & women) with full natural rights that can be exercised as needed to fend off others who have surrendered to the legal fiction of being "persons" created by statute and proper subjects of the juristic scam foisted upon all comers to this legalistic realm.  Yes they do, and "they" get everyone they can to volunteer into it by deception.

Yes pets and children suffer because of their caregivers/parents actions made in ignorance of where rights come from. Rights come from the creator. In the natural world rights come from God almighty. In the "legal world" rights come from "The STATE OF _ _ _ _ _ " which is another legal fiction. - So it really does make a huge difference in what each individual believes and takes action in as a proper subject THEREOF.
Creatures are proper subjects of their creator. If you claim to be a "creature" of the STATE it is your "creator" and owner and as such it will exercise its DOMINION over you, and all you will ever have, children and pets included.

Children are the individual fruit of a living man and woman in nature, they are not creatures of any "STATE" unless their parents act of their own freewill to individually give up their God given natural rights in exchange for "STATE" granted privileges of becoming "legal persons" and thereby proper "subjects" of statutes, codes, certificates, licenses, etc ....

Pets are also individuals found IN NATURE, and are not creatures of any "STATE": unless their caregiver acts to make them "legal" ....

IN REALITY: No individual man, woman, or child has any right to inject anything into any other individual living thing without the consent of the living thing. PERIOD

Since individuals have no such right, no group of people pretending to be ACTORS OF THE STATE OF  _ _ _ _ _ _  can claim to have the right to inject others with anything against the will of another. But sadly the masses of people have been "given over" to their "strong delusions" from which many will perish by their ignorance. ("Ignorance is no excuse in Law.")

So: NO children and pets don't have to be legal. Because they are already natural and that is the reality under which they were created.

NO: no one has to participate in mass delusion or criminal acts, and no one can force anyone else to do so or believe and act a certain way.
BUT: The choice is up to the individual, fight for what is your right, or go along to get along and be one of the "legal" herd.

Yes I agree: parents as men and women need to "take ownership of that responsibility and use a little discernment".

Just know that it is battle of WILLS, and not an easy path to walk, but in the end: it has its rewards. Saying sorry after the fact isn't going to fly either. https://youtu.be/aBQalkIeE7s?t=130

To each their own, they own their ACTS and CHOICES individually.

BTW: SeaMonkey that is a great video, and shows a strong woman risking her career/reputation.

[Temporal Visitor]

unintentional repost - now deleted.

[F6FLT]

"Her thesis was entitled Immunologic Memory to Polysaccharide Antigens. Ironically, her research showed how vaccines work. Yes, she provided us with strong evidence on the effectiveness of vaccines."

"Her research consists of precisely eight published articles. Two of them, very small clinical trials, examined amino acid relationships to autism spectrum disorder. Neither of these two articles even mention vaccines"

"In that one paper [where she is the first author], she concluded that "As the generation and regulation of immunologic memory are central to vaccination, our findings help explain the mode of action of the few existing polysaccharide vaccines and provide a rationale for a wider application of polysaccharide-based strategies in vaccination." Yes, that was a pro-vaccine paper."

"There is nothing in her background that indicates she has compiled robust and scientifically important evidence about vaccines."

"She was interviewed for an antivaccine article in the lunatic website, whale.to, an anti-semitic, hate-filled, conspiracy-laden website run by a pig farmer. It's really hard to get beyond this point."

"She thinks homeopathy works."
...
https://www.skepticalraptor.com/skepticalraptorblog.php/appeal-to-false-authority-who-is-tetyana-obukhanych/

"She only worked in research labs and has no experience in medical clinics."

"Tetyana buys into all the usual antivax tropes and has not used her formal education to her best advantage. She has cherry picked the science to show what she wants it to show, that vaccines are not perfect. This is a real shame. No, Tetyana, we are not ignoring you. We just know better than to believe your version of science."
...
https://vaccinesworkblog.wordpress.com/2017/06/24/how-did-immunologist-tetyana-obukhanych-become-antivax/

[Tink]

I smell a troll, what a stench.
F6FLT, are you family of our famous and distinguished board certified Sir Trollalot?

[partzman]

Here is an interview between Jon Rappoport and a retired vaccine researcher-

https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2019/03/13/interview-with-a-retired-vaccine-researcher/

Pm