Simplest oscillators for DC

[lancaIV]

LCR-tank : action/ reaction freedom degree ? LCR- tank modulation
signals/ pulses: mono-/poly- characteristic ? Or " signal modulation "

[ayeaye]

In the first case you stop investigating before experiments or you stop when the first experiment shows that some law holds true.

Yes by Lactantius the word religion comes from ligare, which means to tie, religare means repeatedly keep tying. By Cicero it came from the word lego, that means to read, but it was always meant in a sense of an obligation.

Yes the research is stopped when it contradicts something that is held true. What is held true at that may come from ignoring something, as ignoring something simplifies, and thus makes the understanding easier, but at that it makes the conclusions faulty. It is like believing that Earth is flat, because this is how we see it, it's simpler. But it restricts the understanding. The modern science as i said ignores connections in time and space, which doesn't really restrict less.

It cannot even describe gravity in the presence of more than two bodies. Newton broke himself free from restrictions, by relying on the general principles of hermeticism and emerald tablets, instead of the doctrines at the time. This enabled him to create a good theory, except the way how he too simplified and ignored some things, then it was again hammered into a doctrine that was established as solely right. Just one example.

What concerns religion though, it is not just a belief. It also contains knowledge that enables to understand, and calling it all belief, rejects that as well. Like emerald tablets were a part of the religion of ancient Egypt, yet they contain universal principles that enable to understand. This is often the case, a lot of knowledge became a part of the religion, because religion was all the world view at the time, no knowledge could be accepted separate from it, thus the only way to make that knowledge known, was to include it into religion. Thus there may be parts of the religion that are good knowledge, which doesn't mean that all the rest of the religion is true.

[lancaIV]

"lego", 1.Persona Singularis, Praesens from legere : to read, Substantiv lex Nominativ,  Singular legisAkk.  , ....... lego : I read " about" ( Wein-Lese),  ~ ponere

Lex : deformed phonetical : " ( parlamentary)  Lesung", ; Church : " Lesung" von Mattias,  Lukas,.....

To differ : https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/reddere I read ( me)" in"
and http://latin-dictionary.net/definition/25678/ligo-ligare-ligavi-ligatus
Religion : from " religio" to " relegere"

[lancaIV]

Yes by Lactantius the word religion comes from ligare, which means to tie, religare means repeatedly keep tying. By Cicero it came from the word lego, that means to read, but it was always meant in a sense of an obligation.

Yes the research is stopped when it contradicts something that is held true. What is held true at that may come from ignoring something, as ignoring something simplifies, and thus makes the understanding easier, but at that it makes the conclusions faulty. It is like believing that Earth is flat, because this is how we see it, it's simpler. But it restricts the understanding. The modern science as i said ignores connections in time and space, which doesn't really restrict less.

It cannot even describe gravity in the presence of more than two bodies. Newton broke himself free from restrictions, by relying on the general principles of hermeticism and emerald tablets, instead of the doctrines at the time. This enabled him to create a good theory, except the way how he too simplified and ignored some things, then it was again hammered into a doctrine that was established as solely right. Just one example.

What concerns religion though, it is not just a belief. It also contains knowledge that enables to understand, and calling it all belief, rejects that as well. Like emerald tablets were a part of the religion of ancient Egypt, yet they contain universal principles that enable to understand. This is often the case, a lot of knowledge became a part of the religion, because religion was all the world view at the time, no knowledge could be accepted separate from it, thus the only way to make that knowledge known, was to include it into religion. Thus there may be parts of the religion that are good knowledge, which doesn't mean that all the rest of the religion is true.

Let me recuse your mind by :a. the  Theories ( and Astro-/Nano-physical " peers reviewed and repeated demonstrations" )
    with Nobel Prize awarded ( Physics, Chemistry) : evolutionary

b. many scientists in older daies has been clerus-members :
     opposed science results contra church constitution and Dogma : Pope(PATRIARCA) :

                                         The VOICE OF GOD   

                     ergo : PAPA(L) INFALLIBILITY by GOD INFALLIBILITY

    Since REFORMATION : cuius regio,  cuius religio;  many PAPAS ( and MAMAS)

   Beside: terrestrical and mental interests clearly : sexual,  Dynaste behind
 
   https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_of_England


   One GODness ( in Unity, Binity,Trinity,.....),  many religionssections

c. By daily quantum technology use , included quantum bio-chemistry/- electric ;    the smallest power plant in future : based by quantum software = virtual power plant in Eprom- size

[ayeaye]

     opposed science results contra church constitution and Dogma :

In essence you are talking just about two world views, in which one appeared to be right in some things, proving understanding these things in the other wrong. This is taken as this world view is supreme in everything. It is again a simplification, and ignoring things. Some things in religion, such as emerald tablets, again may provide something not present in science, and might prove some things in the science wrong or not exact.

Religion yes more likely comes from ligo, not lego. Ligo means mattock, a kind of pickaxe, but as a verb it is understood to mean binding or tying.