Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Zero and Q device

Started by v8karlo, January 04, 2019, 11:18:12 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

v8karlo

Quote from: Hoppy on January 05, 2019, 09:03:44 AM
No, because you would not be claiming anything special.

Have you measured energy ratios or are you just comparing voltage / current levels? I ask this because you make no mention of energy calculations in your 'book' and yet you talk in terms of improved energy efficiency.

You ask me to measure and present everything to you as expert.
You make the circuit and measure it and present it back and tell me the flaws.

Anything what comes from push pull transformer must go through C1 and C2 and back to source.


It is obvious in scheme. If you remove feedback, circuit stops.
Feedback line is the only path for energy to flow from transformer.

You just have to use that energy on its path. That's all.

C1 and C2 together acts as a pit for energy which can never be filled,
because of law of serial connection. It will always pull energy from transformer,
and automatically push it back to source.


C1 and C2 are always at lower voltage level then source.
And yet, together they will always overcome the source.


So whatever you got from transformer is pushed back to source.

The J circuit is looping energy. There is always losses, of course.

Probably you did't even look at such simple scheme.
What if there is hundred components on scheme?
I have only 2 capacitors and 2 diodes and you can not grasp principle.

I put it here, if you wanna look at it, be my guest.

I shared, you don't have to build it. It's that simple.

lancaIV

Hello v8karlo,  nice and smart arrangement !Which of them , C1 and C2, shall I call Flip and which Flop, recusing that the arrangement is a "flopp" !
Remembering me Dr. PAVEL Imris "capacitive winding circuit" concept !
   The Laplace demon , timeless-time out- Timex(registered Trademark) : a ( -n analog, digital) watch   
    analog : "Unruh", the others call it " balance-staff",swinging-period    digital : crystal, oscillation-period
     https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flip-flop_(electronics)
     https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flipflop " UNBEGRENZTE ZEIT " ~ eternal
   
   
   https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charge_pump

Hoppy

Quote from: v8karlo on January 05, 2019, 09:10:17 AM

You make the circuit and measure it and present it back and tell me the flaws.
Anything what comes from push pull transformer must go through C1 and C2 and back to source.

The burden of proof is with you, as you are making the claim of significantly improved efficiency. Your feedback is altering the impedance balance of the device and in the case the 'Q' replication in the other thread, compensates by increasing input current. Overall, there will be no significant efficiency gain from your circuitry as you are claiming.

v8karlo

Quote from: Hoppy on January 05, 2019, 09:28:24 AM
The burden of proof is with you, as you are making the claim of significantly improved efficiency. Your feedback is altering the impedance balance of the device and in the case the 'Q' replication in the other thread, compensates by increasing input current. Overall, there will be no significant efficiency gain from your circuitry as you are claiming.

I don't claim anything. That is you putting the blame in my mouth!

I shared Hoopy, I shared. Nothing else!
You need somebody to blame for something, that's you!

One more time!
I shared what I did. I don't claim. And I don't have to apologize to you for nothing.
If you don't like it, just walk away. There is always nuclear resonance waiting for you.
You don't have to be here.

I spend lot's of time experimenting. And I shared result.



Was I clear enough?


If it does not work. Then it simply did not work. I tried nice concept, and I will keep trying.
You lose nothing in any case. It is only me who lost lots of time.

You and others said before that I am faking light and heat in Zero device.
Did you try to build Zero.

Such a simple circuit. Maybe is to complicated for you to build Zero?

You didn't, but you demand numbers and proof!
Be my guest with that attitude!

Expert.

v8karlo

Quote from: lancaIV on January 05, 2019, 09:24:05 AM
Hello v8karlo,  nice and smart arrangement !Which of them , C1 and C2, shall I call Flip and which Flop, recusing that the arrangement is a "flopp" !
Remembering me Dr. PAVEL Imris "capacitive winding circuit" concept !
   The Laplace demon , timeless-time out- Timex(registered Trademark) : a ( -n analog, digital) watch   
    analog : "Unruh", the others call it " balance-staff",swinging-period    digital : crystal, oscillation-period
     https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flip-flop_(electronics)
     https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flipflop " UNBEGRENZTE ZEIT " ~ eternal
   
   
   https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charge_pump

Thanks for support.


I remember you. Nice to meet you again. It is flip-flop concept. C1 flip - C2 flop.

Now you all know why I was afraid?
Lot's of experts will chase me to the grave because I share.
They know everything and it is hard to have idea or concept and not be blamed or chased from that people.

Hehe, they are funny! They do nothing, no ideas from them.

They just wait for someone to show up so they can bring their expertise to surface.