A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1

[George1]

Well, all links you have sent to me contain complex and sophisticated machines both as a theoretical conception and as a practical realization. Are there any working prototypes of these machines?

[lancaIV]

"Sophisticated" !?
10 000 000 US$/Euros patent  fees ( lump sum ) ~ 200 000 000 US$/Euros FOB factory selling prices                                  5% royalty calculation

x factor 2 :         standart ware  end consumer price
x factor 6,10 : " exclusive" ware end consumer price

As inventor you have investor, producer and endconsumer responsibility !
                                     win : win : win : win ratio

to make all glad , this is a wonder , husiastic or enthusiastic !

Competition : heater, hydrogen generator

f. e.  http://www.rexresearch.com/eccles/1eccles.htm
                          Their technology is/ will be in next "open source".

               Many alternatives and concepts :
           https://overunity.com/electrolysis-of-h20-and-hydrogen-on-demand-generation/

Today to get a patent granted is anymore easy,  the disclosure must be new,  global new  !

And never published :
so beside the WIPO-archiv " patent lawyer" has also to search in the global "Honor-Title" "Dipl.-/Dr./Master "- archives( Promotion,Dissertation,Habilitation)  !

The patent office can grant an application, but there is no warranty of validity of this act  !

[lancaIV]

http://guns.connect.fi/innoplaza/energy/story/Kanarev/
ENERGY IMPULSE SECRETS
" electron emits photon"

page 12 (35) (36) : physical volume comparison


Is the electron volume part from the photon volume  ?
Is the photon the electron his circumspherical heatwave , " Protuberanz" ?
Phonon, without volume?  Definition. ! photon/ phonon ratio
Physical lifetime from electron,  photon, phonon  ? actio/reactio in Fermi-seconds and Nanometers

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phonon
   https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phonon                Ist die elementare Anregung (Quant)  eines elastischen Feldes

Enthusiasmus : becoming Quant-izised by something,  somebody to max.  stage : Ekstase or Delirium

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=5&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19871201&CC=US&NR=4710655A&KC=A#
Physics can hypnotize people with electrodynamic waves/ vibrations/ oscillations  !
But also in written/ broadcasted texture can be " hidden dynamic", ' sleeper awake' principle.

Our economy : from 100 trials 1 success and 99 fails

[George1]

Hi lancaIV,
----------------------------------
1) First of all thank you for your last two posts. They are much detailed and full of interesting information. We will need some time to consider carefully you last two posts.
----------------------------------
2) Actually our two topics "A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1" and "IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?" could not be strictly considered as inventions. These two topics only reveal to the public two theoretical and fundamental scientific research works which can be successfully used (a) as a basic principle of operation of an extremely effective electric heater and (b) as a basic principle of operation of an extremely effective reactionless drive and/or energy generator, respectively. Our aim is to attract attention to our team as a generator of good technology ideas and projects. Our next project however can already be considered as an invention. It has an undeniable theoretical scientific foundation and a working prototype, which is practically ready for production on a large industrial scale. And we do not intend to patent it. We intend to sell it as a know-how. Our price is $10,000,000 (ten million dollars.)
-----------------------------------
Looking forward to your answer.
Regards,
George

[tinu]

...
2) Actually our two topics "A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1" and "IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?" could not be strictly considered as inventions. These two topics only reveal to the public ...

... your incompetence!

This two topics only reveal your incompetence in physics and they are fundamentally erroneous, nothing more!
I finally agree with you for once! Of course they could not be considered as inventions. lol

...
Our next project however can already be considered as an invention. It has an undeniable theoretical scientific foundation and a working prototype, which is practically ready for production on a large industrial scale. And we do not intend to patent it. We intend to sell it as a know-how. Our price is $10,000,000 (ten million dollars.)

I think your aim is to scam people so please cut the crap.

Nonetheless, if you think you have an invention to sell, please get out and go elsewhere. Here, we share information for free. Can you understand such a simple and yet marvelous concept: "share for free"? 

And since there is no one here besides you, start using "I/me/mine", instead of "we/ours". Ok, your majesty? lol