A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1

[lancaIV]

Prof.  Kanarevs view and experimental results are as same interessant/interestant as the " kids education method" :
                                            peak to average to effective power ratio
   15000 W are as same as 144 W    but this 144 W are also as same as 1,44 W  :
   and this values applied give for example in electrolysis a C.O.P. about 3xfold and more

              mad linear/dynamic science , pardon : today expressed " fuzzy logic "

                           How do climate experts calculate ? 

[George1]

Hi lancaIV,
This for the climate experts calculations is well said! Congratulations!
So you are sceptic, aren't you? No rational part in his numerous research works at all? (I still have not read all of the Kanarev's research works.) Those, which I have read already however, contain too many sophisticated theoretical models, two many unknowns, too many hypothesys proclaimed as axioms/postulates, etc. So your recommendation is to stop reading as the Kanarev's approach is similar to the weather forecast calculations?
Regards,
George   

[lancaIV]

No,  George1, it is important to study the different works and experiments and their results from Kanarev !
   It is about "dynamic" ! In theory and practise  !
                                                    And comparison !

                                                       given example for a generator :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=US&NR=2012256422A1&KC=A1&FT=D&ND=3&date=20121011&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP#

Paragraph 92 related to Paragraph 94 : 1000/100 RPM but 1000/1 Watt power
                         SIMPLE KIDS THINKING ( Finger more/less calculation) :           

             when 100 Rotations are the 1/10 part from 1000 R.,  why I get only 1/1000 output  ?

                                                                         DYNAMICS
Professor Kanarev is trying to give the answer for all electric devices,  motor/generator/transformer, and especially for pulse power by PWM apply (modulated signals in time and bandwidth !)
               This " dynamic motive  power magic"  f.e. 1/10~1/1000 he tries to make understandable  !

And 15000 W ~ 144 W ~ 1,44 W : this statement is conditionized ! By time and on/off- periods !
(Ab-)using numbers : 1 Wh = 3600 Ws=  3,6 KWs = 3600000 Wms = 3,6 MWms


Endo-/exothermic plays in ambient an important rule,  included enthalpy  ! I think you know about it. !
Use in simple manner :
http://www.iwilltry.org/b/heat-your-home-with-a-dehumidifier/  Pseudo- open cycle- C. O. P.  ? Lesser humidity in air / lower the total C. O. P.
                                 
                          Humidifier/Nebulizer/Mister/Fogger
Counteract : https://www.google.com/search?q=air+conditioning+mister&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-m

Also wrong are linear calculations for thermic devices :
Fujitsu as heat pump producer gives in their webpage the example about heat need with 15°C and 20°C amplitudeand explains an hundred percent power consume difference .
In their new experimental construction this company shows that this is not only heat pumps related :https://www.fenixgroup.cz/de
So each degree temperature more above 15°C room heating means 20% more power consume. !And not 20°/15° is 33,3% more dividing with 5 degrees = 6,7  % more per °C

[Sergh]

Another project from Belarus country:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxLbzvSows8

Author's comments:

...2 kW for heating 80 m2 room for a rabbit farm with poor thermal insulation...
The project is commercial, with its seeming simplicity, it contains everything that was acquired by many years of testing and thousands of successful and failed experiments. Therefore, it does not intend to publish the technical details of this device.
1. A very high voltage is applied to the cell.
2. If you reduce the voltage below the starting point of the electrolysis process, then whatever current strength you apply, heating will not be possible.
3. The heat system does not produce any gases, only heat.
4. Shock current can only if you take up the central part of the electrolyzer. In a commercial sample, the electrolyzer will be in a closed case. Everything else, including the radiators are not energized, the device also works in tandem with the RCD, this eliminates the possibility of electric shock.

[George1]

Hi lancaIV,
Hi Sergh,
1) Please give me some time to cosider carefully your last posts.
2) Last week we were fully occupied with preparing a set of calorimetric experiments related to water-splitting electrolysis and this process took a lot of time. Experimental calorimetry is may be one of the most sophisticated branches of modern science.
I will write to you both in the nearest future.
Regards,
George