Stanley Meyers revisited

[popeye68]

What you guys think of this one ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y__YCvFF8iM#

[ForeverBlissed]

That video is not really worth commenting on.

I would not be surprised it if was put there by some paid oil company schmuck.

The logic behind the deduction that it is a scam based on the fact that there was a generator located in both the lab and the car is flawed.

This is an experimental system right?

Did they expect to see a finished product?

Give me a break!

FB

[TheOne]

yeah i rated this crappy video 0, that deserve only that

disinformation video, obviously his system don't work on 110 volt anyway, it's using ac...

[popeye68]

Yeah , but wich milliamps was Meyers measuring...

I think he pulsed the alternator and so got his ramped-pulses , maybe with
faseshifts.

But was he measuring between the puls-unit and the alternator, or
was he measuring whole system powerusage
(as he used mains power in this setup..)

I'm not saying it was a scam b.t.w. , just curious ;-)

[kentoot]

Well, when I see a video with not much info in it except lots of bright red flashing displays ...hmm... most likely we don't have to take it seriously. It's just a joke, but not funny.

All along I knew Stan was not really a theoritical guy, his approach shows this. He was happy enough to get his system in a closed loop, supplying energy to a car, and move on to other things to improve his system. Posititvely thinking, if he was a theoritical guy, most likely he couldn't have went ahead and invent something like this. I feel that's why he didn't really touch much on the theoritical side, he didn't have the urge to do any extensive research in this aspect, he was pretty much a practical kind of guy. I believe he did get it to work, it's just that we can't get much detail measurements from his unit.

Knowing this fact that he was pretty much a pratical guy, I think we shouldn't take his theoritical explanations (in his notes / patent) so literally. Stan just tried his best to explain the things that happened in his cell, but that doesn't necessarily mean it actually happened that way. I believe he didn't put on purpose some disinformation to confuse / distract us, it's just his way of explaining things. So we should know how to read his patents, and extract the useful informations.

I believe if we want to replicate Stan's work, just do exactly that, REPLICATE, nothing else. Try to design something as close as possible to Stan's configuration. That way even if Stan's theory is a bit off, we can still get the system to work first. Our design should be based on his findings, not purely on his theories. If we venture off doing other things with Stan's theoritical explanation backing us up, well ... I think it's a long shot, but it IS possible ... who knows.

Regarding the milliamp readings, I really think we should just try it ourselves. This kind of detail measurements and other know how, I believe that's our task to find out. So that in the future it's easier to make Stan's system with different configurations.