Bedini Window Motor came from Newman & How Story Changed

[rickfriedrich]

This is major news!
I think it is rather important for everyone to realize that the Bedini Window Motor/Energizer really came from Newman. I have proven that and that the motor came after 1984 (not 1971) in recent videos where I quote Bedini himself in his 1984 audio interview on the Open Mind.
https://youtu.be/KJlcQc8CrRY
This video shows that the 1984 Bedini Testimony disproves several of his Fake Lab Notes later added dates. You can see that during those early years John actually recommended the Newman motor (as the recently released 1984 video from psychotronics ends with John doing just that). You can see from the audio John admits when and how he first came to believe in free energy (from Bearden's 1983 book, and after making his first Energizer setup according to Bearden's direction). His booklet is then published, and he THEN looks to find these processes in other motors such as Kromrey, Adams, Newman, etc. Bedini's old website and lab notes show this progression.

But years later (2006) John decided to change his history as I show in this video: https://youtu.be/0tS94bNcYas
After he gave me his lab notes to scan and digitalize I posted them to my private Window motor group (which is now available). There you can see John is asking me for permission to post the files there. When I scanned the files there was a blank page with 1971 written on it and for some reason John decided create a new history for himself as you can read from his email in that forum. He eventually shares this with Tony C who republishes the second 2011 edition of Free Energy Generation book with the new window motor material and with this claim right on the front cover that the window motor booklet was first published and copyrighted in 1971 when John was only 22 years old (and 13 years before he even believed in free energy). This false claim is even on the copyright page.

However, not only do we have John admitting in late 1984 that he was just getting started that year, but I just realized that the Energy From The Vacuum video 7, which I was also in, has John saying the following:

Second part, minute 32--32:30: "It's been known ever since the Watson, Jim Watson, and the FIRST free energy motors that we did. That when you charge them negative-wise well the normal charger can't fill in the holes. "How long did you work with Watson?' "For over two years before he did the motor. Well, remember that THIS MOTOR CAME OUT OF THAT LITTLE BOOK that I did IN THE BEGINNING, Bedini's Free Energy Generator."
[BTW, this is a very important DVD that everyone overlooked. It is exactly what I am presenting in the third stage process. If Bedini only did this video, or the first part of this video on impulse, then the whole free energy community would be much better off. You can almost ignore everything else he said because of how valuable this is. I spent an entire day teaching on this at a private meeting last week. In the video he makes his most impressively claim, but because his body language was not consistent nobody realized how important it was. This was John hiding the truth in plain sight and giving it out to only those worthy of the information (ie, those who pay attention). He said: "So no matter how many nodes, at the right rate you can KEEP ADDING these circuits like Tesla did."]

Ironically this admission that the window motor came from his 1984 book actually contradicts the 1971 claim on the front cover of the book that he was giving to Tony C around the same time. And I also didn't remember John making this statement in the DVD7 (I don't think I ever watched it because I was there in the video). So John lied to everyone and to Tony, which makes a real mess for Tony to deal with as a publisher making false copyright claims.

These major contradictions show how John attempted to later change his history and try to erase Newman's influence. For those of us who knew John we understood from John the influence of Ron Cole upon him, and Newman's influence upon Ron Cole. Cole was attempting to improve upon Newman's system. They were using different switching. You can see the old website and lab note dates that were not faked that show late 1980s dates when specific geometric configurations were first realized. Yet the 2011 publication includes this fake document purporting to be from 1971 where all these ideas developed by Cole and Bedini in the late 80s were all in mature form in one document!!!

Nobody realized this great Bedini lie until I re-listened to the 1984 audio some years back and carefully went over all the history. And then my former dealer Aaron Murakami decided to expand his lies and slander against me by offering up Bedini's faked lab note (faked as the date is clearly 3 years prior to Bedini's belief in free energy, and the writing is clearly put in after the fact) as some kind of disproof against me on his website. Aaron didn't know any history of Bedini and didn't realize that that lab note was actually my digital file that I made in 2006. So now Aaron has shot himself in the foot by forcing this major Bedini lie to be exposed. So what are these guys going to do about it? Will Aaron apologize for attacking me? Will he admit that John was a liar? Again, why did John lie about this? Because he was trying to erase Newman history and give the appearance that he was around longer than he was. And this is why I bring this up here.

John lied about other history and people as well, and often exaggerated his stories and claims. Since I promoted him and substantially boosted his popularity it becomes me to let the public know the truth. John also lied about his history with me on his history page on his website. There he changed the story and dates of what happened and when. People like Aaron suppress these truths and you can realize why they do that. This is all about selling story-telling and revisionist history to controll the opposition. To some extent this relates to cointelpro.

I will be curious to see if this major news gets ignored or buried or deleated.

[lancaIV]

I did not know that you, Rick Friedrich, are here in the forum member  !
Why do you let promote a.king21 and benfr your work and DVDs and do not personally demonstrate the resultsfrom your research  ?

Counter-rumor :
http://www.energyscienceforum.com/showthread.php?t=3782
WHAT IS PHYSICALLY POSSIBLE WITH YOUR DEVICE / CONCEPT ?

high efficiency < 100% or output > 100% related to input : C.O.P. ?00%



Sincerely
OCWL
p.s. : C.O.P. of the " loving path" charge system ?

http://potentialtec.com/   

http://www.r-charge.net/Free-Energy_ep_56.html
Rick Fradella battery charger : 90- days lead- battery lasted 10 years with proper charge controller

[rickfriedrich]

I don't use the forums because they are generally distracting people. So I don't really look at them anymore. Of course I was a major contributor to free energy forums starting in 2004.
I don't let or promote these people you mention so I don't understand your point. I do in fact personally demonstrate my stuff. That is IN PERSON. I don't put any value in video demonstrations if that is what you are looking for. You should not be convinced by any video. All I do in my videos is show people how to do things themselves. Now if you are talking about RICK (Resonance Induction Coupler Kit) I did just demonstrate 100 coils being powered by the transmitter at my last meeting. And that was just one layer. When I get some time I'll post a picture of it all lit up with 18 people watching it (who actually helped me set up all the coils).

But why bring this up here? That has nothing to do with the Bedini or Newman motors.
Rick

[quote author=lancaIV link=topic=18241.msg535239#msg535239 date=1560453347
I did not know that you, Rick Friedrich, are here in the forum member  !
Why do you let promote a.king21 and benfr your work and DVDs and do not personally demonstrate the resultsfrom your research  ?]

[lancaIV]

Here the two members a.king21 and benfr wrote " positively" and with DVD buying promotion ( " as donation")
https://overunity.com/17491/confirmation-of-ou-devices-and-claims/msg535241/#new
You are not delivering new " Newman/Bedini motor" technology news but wish to " correct" wrong accusations  about relationships in the history.
We are here not a " mea/ sua culpa" forum or tribunal !

What interests actually is : what is your RICK and other developments economically worth !?
How much savings/ gains can become reached and by which R.O.I.- time !?

Sincerely
OCWL

[rickfriedrich]

If you bother to read my post you will see one of the most significant facts that I just revealed which I quoted from DVD7. This is new news because no one noticed it. It is the revelation of how to multiply the negative energy output from an inductor as many times as you wish.
Again, I don't understand why you divert from what I shared and go into other OU devices of mine. I fail to even understand what you are trying to say here. Are you speaking good about this or wish to talk about the Resonance kit? Why would you bring that up here?
As for the history focus of this post, it is a fundamental fact. Are you wishing for people to not learn these facts? I am bringing out the development of the technology over the years. I sell the Window motor, and have been doing that for years. I have introduced this as a historical context as people have a right to know how all this came about. You are saying that this history is not important? Who made you the judge of that? I am trying to give Newman credit here, and trying to encourage people to carefully consider testimonies, etc.

So as for sharing specific new things, I don't see you sharing anything new. I will make an important point however, seeing that you insist something new has to be revealed on this website. Newman and Bedini both insisted that the coil has to wrap around the motor and that was the reason John called it a window. Now I found that to be most inconvenient as it meant you had the shaft in the way of the windings. So when you have more than one N and S pole I found that the coil merely could be placed in front of one N and the S next to it. This gave the same benefits. It really wasn't anything different, but both these men made such a deal about their coils that they said my coils were a different motor.

Anyway, I am not looking for approval or tribunal here. I am simply sharing very important information that affects a lot of people all over the world.

Can you take a little more time to properly write out your sentences. I do not understand your letters or even if you are asking questions or what subject you are even on.
Rick

Here the two members a.king21 and benfr wrote " positively" and with DVD buying promotion ( " as donation")
https://overunity.com/17491/confirmation-of-ou-devices-and-claims/msg535241/#new
You are not delivering new " Newman/Bedini motor" technology news but wish to " correct" wrong accusations  about relationships in the history.
We are here not a " mea/ sua culpa" forum or tribunal !

What interests actually is : what is your RICK and other developments economically worth !?
How much savings/ gains can become reached and by which R.O.I.- time !?

Sincerely
OCWL