Nelson Rocha Workbench

[Raycathode]

Dog, hello we know this circuit don't we  it's the Akula porch light the one that has the 7414 can't be bothered looking for it

I just posted a bread board using this cuicuit on the Dally thread, whats the cut off frequency of a tip 31 ? 20Nsecs  (try 3 mhz) =333ns

Yeah show me the scope shot  now show me it working  now tell me how you have done it ! Any thing is possible 

Regards Raymondo

[EMJunkie]

  EMJunkie:  To answer your question, no, I never replicated any of Kapanadze's devices. Nor will I, as he has not open sourced any of his projects. Nor has anyone else been able to replicate any of his devices, as yet.
  I replicated an earlier Stalker schematic and device, that has clear videos, schematics, and full explanations. And that is what I still have on hand. But, I will not waste more time on something that is not clearly showing all the details. Unless...there is some hope that there is a useful and practical purpose to do so. Yes, I have become kind of like Hoppy was, a bit skeptical after all these years.
  Nelson: Please forgive me if I sound confused, but, do you have a self running device (like the one you showed on youtube), or not? I ask because you mentioned that it is not self running. Can you clear that up for me. And if so, why are you looking into other circuits. As your self running device, is the only thing on this whole forum, that self runs. But, you don't want to discuss it?  Correct?
  All I'm really into, are solid state self runners. But, I am an electronic assembler, not an inventor. Like you.
  In anycase,  as you are asking for help, IF, I can be of help to you, con mucho gusto.
                                                                       NickZ

Hi NickZ,

My reply below:

  EMJunkie:  To answer your question, no, I never replicated any of Kapanadze's devices. Nor will I, as he has not open sourced any of his projects. Nor has anyone else been able to replicate any of his devices, as yet.

For the record, I, 100% believe in Kapanadze's work and devices, he is a Giant in the field! 

  I replicated an earlier Stalker schematic and device, that has clear videos, schematics, and full explanations. And that is what I still have on hand. But, I will not waste more time on something that is not clearly showing all the details. Unless...there is some hope that there is a useful and practical purpose to do so. Yes, I have become kind of like Hoppy was, a bit skeptical after all these years.

Great to hear! I wish you luck on that device.

Best wishes, stay safe and well,
   Chris Sykes

[EMJunkie]

So let me ask you guys.  Keeping it simple as I can.

Below is my circuit diagram for the Akula/Ruslan self-powered flashlight.
I greyed out the stuff I feel isn't all that important, at least not for this
post.  The inductor you see could be anything.  Akula used a flyback core,
Ruslan used a pot core and I suppose Nelson could use a pair of bifilar
pancake coils.

I'm not saying one way or another whether this circuit actually works.
Instead, I'm asking this:  If it did work, what would have to happen
in the portion of the circuit I haven't greyed out?

Someone asked the question, "Where does the energy enter the system?"

Suppose for a moment (uh hum), time is the energy we are trying to
get to jump into our devices.  What I mean is, what if we play a little
trick with time.  We know electrical energy typically moves at about
one foot in one nanosecond.  Now imagine if we do a little something
with our inductor where the same electrical energy has to be in two
places at exactly the same time.  Crazy aay?  But just for the sake of
grins let's suppose we have a mechanism to do this.  Then let's suppose
we can get the polarity correct in such a way we can power things
with it.  We can light LEDs, or we can charge a capacitor that keeps
things running.  Or, if we're having a really good day, we can do both.
And it's my suspicion, we have to do both.

If we take the optimistic perspective here that at least one of these
many OU devices we have all seen is real, how could it possibly
work?  I have a hunch the concept is actually very simple and the
technique to make it happen is what's killing us.

@DogOne,

Your Post is great to see! Thank You, some 5 odd pages on Nelsons thread and this is by far the best post here! By far the smartest approach! By far the most observant!

So let me ask you guys.  Keeping it simple as I can.

Below is my circuit diagram for the Akula/Ruslan self-powered flashlight.
I greyed out the stuff I feel isn't all that important, at least not for this
post.  The inductor you see could be anything.  Akula used a flyback core,
Ruslan used a pot core and I suppose Nelson could use a pair of bifilar
pancake coils.

I'm not saying one way or another whether this circuit actually works.
Instead, I'm asking this:  If it did work, what would have to happen
in the portion of the circuit I haven't greyed out?

An excellent approach! What is clear, is that 99% of the Circuitry is used to drive the Gate of the Mosfet. This 99% can be put to the side for the moment, and the focus should be on the Coils, the Core and the Magnetic Fields. Of course, this series of Magnetic Interactions in the proximity of the Conducting Coils, is important, of course Electromagnetic Induction occurs every time The Magnetic Field Changes in Time, or the Current Changes in Time in proximity to the Conductors.

Engineers try very hard to eliminate this Parasitic Inductance, but we want to capitalise on this!

Someone asked the question, "Where does the energy enter the system?"

People that ask this question are in desperate need to do more Homework! The Conventional "Generator", would these people ask the same question? What would be their answer? Could they give an answer that makes any sense whatsoever?

   1: Where is the only place inside a "Generator", that has Insulated abundance of Charge?
   2: Why is it, that we must bare the ends of the Copper Coil Conductors, to access this Charge?
   3: What are the processes occurring, to make this Charge become 1: Separated, and then 2: Flow as a Current?
   4: Is there any Electrical Transformation, ever, at any stage of the "Generators" lifetime that re-charges the Copper Coil?


Some people would debate, the Torque on the shaft is the transformation of Energy, to Electrical Energy, and this Transformation is where the Energy comes from, but there is Zero Electrical connection to the Shaft! There has to be, or the Charges would become short circuited! There is Zero Transformation Process occurring here, in the form of Torque, to Electrical Energy, Joules per second!

In point of fact, technically, Faraday's Law of Electromagnetic Induction predicts E.M.F, Electromotive Force, measured in units of Volts, and the "Generator" can "Generate" a Voltage, or E.M.F with only Windage and Frictional Forces on the Rotor, so this is wrong and not correct!

Only when a Current is Flowing in the "Generator" Coils, a M.M.F, a Torque is imposed on the Shaft!

So, this Shaft Torque is an After Effect of Faraday's Law of Electromagnetic Induction, the Shaft Torque is not the Cause at all!

To answer the question you put forward, we must:

   1: Define what Energy is!
   2: Identify the Only Place this Energy can come from!
   3: Observe the phenomenon that gives rise to the Process of Voltage x Current deemed as 6.24 x 10¹⁸ Electrons per second past point P, equaling One Ampere. Kinetic Energy, as the Great Nikola Tesla pointed out.


Einstein's Mass Energy Equivalence is what these people need to study! These people need to do a ton of Homework! Learn what Charge is, learn whats required for Charge to flow, e.g: A Conductor, and learn why Conductivity is so important!

1954, declassified: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xhqMDMMgz0

Energy enters every System the same way, the Solution to the Source Charge Problem is the answer, but many are ignorant to whats really going on here!

There is NO MYSTERY to an educated mind!

Suppose for a moment (uh hum), time is the energy we are trying to
get to jump into our devices.  What I mean is, what if we play a little
trick with time.  We know electrical energy typically moves at about
one foot in one nanosecond.

Time is important, and the Domain we can gain Energy, is in the Time Domain, we can Gain Energy over the course of Time.

Now imagine if we do a little something
with our inductor where the same electrical energy has to be in two
places at exactly the same time.  Crazy aay?  But just for the sake of
grins let's suppose we have a mechanism to do this.  Then let's suppose
we can get the polarity correct in such a way we can power things
with it.  We can light LEDs, or we can charge a capacitor that keeps
things running.  Or, if we're having a really good day, we can do both.
And it's my suspicion, we have to do both.

On My Forum, we recently went through an example:

My Friends,

@Gravitation, YoElMiCrO has given you the worlds biggest gift!

We see:

Method of "Generation", Charge Separation.
Charge Pumping, Opposite Magnetic Fields.
And more...


YoElMiCrO is right, this is very important!





However if we use the above circuit we will see that the sum of the charges will exceed the initial load and as efficiency is (EndQ1+EndQ2)/StartQ1 AU is posible..

This says a lot, everyone start analyzing ...
Q = VcC = It.



The Charge on a Capacitor is: Q = C٠V

Where C is the Capacitance in Farads and V is Volts. Q is in Coulombs if Memory serves. So this means, 2200uF = ‭0.0022‬ Farads. Voltage on the Capacitor is 12 Volts at the start. The switch S1, when closed has an RLC Time Constant across the Tank Circuit. For series RLC circuit Time Constant is 2L/R and for parallel RLC circuit Time Constant is 2RC. This means after 1 t, the Charge on C2 can be more than C1!

Note the Similarity to Akula's Circuit! Everyone! This is important! We all have to work on this together! We must Share this with the World! We must make change for our Children and their Children!

Best wishes,

   Chris Sykes

My Friends,

I should have finished the Equation off!

The Charge on a Capacitor is: Q = C٠V

Where:

C is the Capacitance in Farads.
V is the Voltage in Volts.
Q is in Coulombs. 1 Joule (J) = 1 Volt X 1 Coulomb.


So this means, 2200uF = ‭0.0022‬ Farads. Voltage on the Capacitor is 12 Volts at the start.

As YoElMiCrO said:

StartQ1 = 0.0022‬ Farads x 12 Volts = ‭0.0264‬ Coulombs.



using the same process, if C1 and C2 ( EndQ1 + EndQ2 ), after 1 Cycle has: ‭0.0265‬ Coulombs, then we have an Above Unity Machine. More Energy Output than was Input!

NOTE: This is possible because we have an Open System, a System that has an Extra, Asymmetrical Energy Input to the System!

Best wishes,

   Chris Sykes

So, in the below Circuit, if you do the Experiment, and get the Coil Polarity correct, and find Resonance, then you can see a gain in Energy this way, as you point out DogOne!

Ask yourself, why have I only drawn one Polarity Dot? What happens to L1 during the Cycle?

Study the next Image down, ask: REACTIVE AT RESONANCE, what is meant by this?

If we take the optimistic perspective here that at least one of these
many OU devices we have all seen is real, how could it possibly
work?  I have a hunch the concept is actually very simple and the
technique to make it happen is what's killing us.

I agree, Understanding is Key, its the understanding of Processes, the Effects, Interactions of the Magnetic Fields, and I like to see optimistic used, I think that's great!

@Nelson, your comments and perspective here would be appreciated!

Best wishes, stay safe and well,
   Chris Sykes

[Atti2]

An idea for understanding. I'm a member of Chris' own forum. But I am not a member of a closed elite group. Therefore, I can only add my own opinion.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3p828czPofw&feature=emb_logo

Similar idea.
http://zsiguli.hu/cikk/55

[lancaIV]

Calculating with " ideal numbers" : in vacuum or in air/liquid ?

Only with one directional trapping coil ( ccw or cw) or bi-/multi-filiar(ccw and cw),their poles to load/charger/converter +/- connection  ?
C.O.P. numbers : kunel static dynamo C.O.P. 10 x / 10 Ampere-windings output: 1/1  ratio !

Can we assume that analog in photoelectric the recombination "time window" also in phonoelectic there is the existence from such a "time window", the wave/electron/ion to wire ( absorption or reflection) angle and refractory index number ?

Better to use rough surface coils,with high density ares ~ black silicon,than fine surface coils !Holes per sqmm coil ? Skin effect ! (Eigen-)Spin effect !

We take a DC motor with rotor/propeller/turbine and an AC generator with rotor/propeller/turbine :
                        = DC to AC inversion
Or we take a static device,called DC/AC converter = inverter 

the two rotative rotor/propeller/turbine are represented/transformed in .....   /by  ....... ?!
Flynn parallel path group : linear actuator to rotative actuator ! The used formula !


Richard Fradella : when a 1000 W generator with 1000 RPM nominal generates 1000 Watt then with 100 RPM this generator generates 1 Watt,each cases by ≥ 94% conversion efficiency !

Velocity of electricity in vacuum/in air ?

Sincerely
OCWL
p.s.: taking away from the Sweet VTA the magnets and core :       

air coil and through this a laser beam or electro-magnetic beam 

         ~ photon/phonon into a whole( in one) or white whole