Nelson Rocha Workbench

[onepower]

Nickz
All well and good, but Nelson does not own this tech, and has not built a self running device, ever. No one here has.
So, just who do you listen to, or follow. It's like the blind leading the blind. And the ones who can see, will not show us the way.   Do you really think that you can do what all the scientist in the world with all their instruments, labs, and money can't do?I know that this and more is possible, and is already being use in the underground secret labs, EM space crafts, etz...

I find your attitude strange because D.M.Cook, Nikola Tesla, T.H.Moray, Hendershot, Floyd Sweet and hundreds of others solved the problem many by the light of gas lanterns in run down sheds using cotton and wax as insulators for there conductors. Meanwhile you have the combined knowledge of most of mankind as internet at your fingertips, microcomputers and electronics and the global overnight shipping of materials yet continue to be unable to produce the desired results.

Do you really think that you can do what all the scientist in the world with all their instruments, labs, and money can't do?

Absolutely because maybe 6% are involved in advanced electrodynamics theory, half of them are using antiquated theory and half of that just incompetent so really were looking at a fraction of a percent and there work will never see the light of day. Those poor people are probably gagged by NDA's/national secrecy  and dictated to by some dim wit in a suit or ex-military so yes my confidence is high. I can basically do whatever the hell I want within reason and answer only to myself so I'm cool with that.

[NickZ]

  Ok, well good luck to you.

[onepower]

Nelson

The energy gap in the dielectric material's is very large and being the air a dialectic agent, we could theorize the possibility of exist a interaction between positive and negative ionic charges existing in the environment as a way to draw energy from outside to the coils.
Are those charges static?
Tesla mentioned in some of his quotes, about these charges not being static ...
Was he referring to the Displacement currents?

Sorry for posting off topic material in your thread in response to Nickz, you can delete it if you want.

In response to the quote above from your post #70, I did an interesting experiment relating to your quote based on the work of T.H.Moray. It was said Moray could generate large amounts of power from his device but also detect movement and sound from great distances. I then occurred to me that a simple 100 foot wire antenna cannot detect movement/sound at a distance, there must be something else.

At which point I imagined a very large electric field surrounding the antenna like a balloon, a virtual antenna if you will, not material in itself but able to interact with the material of the antenna. At which point I built an antenna with a HV capacitor attached to ground for isolation and charged the antenna to some 100 kV. Here the electric field of the antenna could be detected some 20 to 30 feet away with my electrometer.

I also noticed that there were always fluctuations in the readings so I then invented an isolated/insulated electronic version of Tesla's coherer which was placed within the dielectric of the HV capacitor. In fact this apparatus can detect almost any nearby disturbances for the same reasons a HF joule thief changes frequency and input power when we move our hand near it. So while my HV virtual antenna and a HF oscillator like a joule thief may seem very different in appearance the laws of science which dictate there action remain.

I could have spent months maybe years studying this single device and all the phenomena related to it however I tend to prove a theory then move on to the next one. So yes a large electric field not constrained externally and free to move is displaced by external forces which can be detected with sufficiently sensitive equipment. As well, it should be understood these disturbances and displacements are not due to the obvious answer that my device was detecting common RF radio signals or 60 Hz power fluctuations. It was not RF or domestic power because when I demodulated the disturbances or signals no RF or 60 Hz was present.

It's actually quite easy in retrospect and a 5$ 15 kV negative ion generator, homemade HV capacitor and DIY electrometer circuit is a good start. My point is that reality and nature are not static, it is not a line diagram on a piece of paper nor equations in a textbook. Nature is messy, it's chaotic and in perpetual motion on almost every level except our own which gives the false appearance of being static.

I hope this adds to your conversation and gives people something to think about.

Regards

[NickZ]

   Onepower:   Ok, well thanks for your post. Not sure what it has to do with Free Energy. But, I am sure that there is more to all this than meets the eyes. Anything that Tesla has stated is of interest to me, not sure about Moray, as I have not studied his work. However, Akula did mention that his Tesla coil transmitter signal could be heard on his car radio, quite a ways away, something like a kilometer away the device.
   Thanks again,
                        NickZ

[onepower]

Nickz

Onepower:   Ok, well thanks for your post. Not sure what it has to do with Free Energy. But, I am sure that there is more to all this than meets the eyes. Anything that Tesla has stated is of interest to me, not sure about Moray, as I have not studied his work. However, Akula did mention that his Tesla coil transmitter signal could be heard on his car radio, quite a ways away, something like a kilometer away the device.

I understand, you should look at T.H. Morays work which is massive and I would consider him to be the best FE resource.

This document is the bible of free energy in my opinion and is required reading...
http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/ebooks/Moray-TheSeaofEnergy.pdf

Moray explains his reasoning and the technology but more important he shows us the proper perspective. We are literally swimming in a sea of energy where everything is already in perpetual motion. So we need to discard this absurd notion of creation and think transformation. There is no need to create anything nor could we and all energy and mass relates solely to transformations.

This is why I could look at Nelson's work and understand what he was doing because I wasn't looking for a source supposedly creating something from nothing. I was looking for a specific process which produced a transformation of energy or force in this case. In fact it was obvious and the first thing I always do is look for something out of place, something which is different. From there I work the problem backwards, what is different, what is it doing and why?.

Understand, every circuit is swimming in a sea of energy which is also inside the physical material. When we disturb the material of the circuit the sea of energy reacts and in this way we can access any amount of energy. Energy is motion and everything, everywhere is already in perpetual motion. By far the greatest insight I ever had is that creation was a myth and what I was looking for was a transformation. I give credit to Moray and his work which is why I consider it mandatory reading.

Regards