Russian voltage multiplicator stacking

[nix85]

...

[Turbo]

I see that i'm not the only one who thinks that you are such an asshole.

[nix85]

Just like you claimed "All i seen is words. Words are not free energy and neither is buoyancy." in my "simple and powerful principle" thread...

https://overunity.com/18434/simple-and-powerful-principle/

..and then turned out admitting you were wrong and coming up with ideas based on the principle, so has this bright cookie accused Dave from the video i linked for saying multiplier output is DC, not pulsed DC, and ended up deleting his comments. Funny isn't it, you asshole.

[ramset]

Hmmm
Actually ...Turbo and Carroll have contributed tonnes here ,True Turbo was one of the founders of Overunity research forum ...and felt some topics were a little risky to experiment with here///  "effects" which could cause harm ?? [
I had asked him recently [begged a bit] to kick other things around since he is such an asset here [IMO]
as your exchange with  Carroll...?  I think you need a bit more "calmness" and perhaps more perspective to the schematic you point to [what is the claim ?]

// Nix..I have appreciated many of your posts "outside of the box...personally ...I think we need more of that...
but not so much the conflict..
Just one mans opinion

Chet K   PS,  I was going to see if Cadman or member Evolvingape  had some input on the bouyancy topic...they built and studied much there....no stone left unturned...

[nix85]

Hmmm
Actually ...Turbo and Carroll have contributed tonnes here ,True Turbo was one of the founders of Overunity research forum ...and felt some topics were a little risky to experiment with here///  "effects" which could cause harm ?? [
I had asked him recently [begged a bit] to kick other things around since he is such an asset here [IMO]
as your exchange with  Carroll...?  I think you need a bit more "calmness" and perhaps more perspective to the schematic you point to [what is the claim ?]

// Nix..I have appreciated many of your posts "outside of the box...personally ...I think we need more of that...
but not so much the conflict..
Just one mans opinion

Chet K   PS,  I was going to see if Cadman or member Evolvingape  had some input on the bouyancy topic...they built and studied much there....no stone left unturned...

I don't doubt what you say, that they are old members and have contributed a lot. And i fully agree we don't need conflict here, there is too much of it already over the years (as i have read a lot).

I might overreacted a bit when Carrol called out Dave that he "doesn't know what he's talking about" altho he was actually the one who was wrong, but i could have addressed that in bit smoother way.

As for Turbo, he also has a bit of an attitude and when he replies to my thread calling it false or whatever while also being wrong (like buoyancy thing), i also have a bit of short fuse.

But again, we all need to be calmer and think twice before reacting, not just me, all of us.