AC voltage from single magnetic pole

[verpies]

Your link is not working.  But it appears you are trying to change the subject again.  We are NOT talking about transformers.  We ARE talking about a magnet inducing voltage and current in a coil. 

Yes, transformers are at least 2 magnetically coupled inductive circuits and we are talking about about a magnet inducing voltage and current in a single inductive circuit.
This transformers are a different subject.

[verpies]

It's funny how you try to prove he's right with resistive coils while doing the test wrongly forgetting he is making a claim for PURELY INDUCTIVE COIL.

I never narrowed it down to purely inductive coils only, although I claim this for purely inductive coils as well. Just read the text of my 1 BTC challenge.
I do however narrow down the lack of delay between the induced voltage and induced current to coils which are energized magnetically - not electrically !


@ Partzman
I do not want you to make experiments which are designed to prove my point.  Only the truth.

[nix85]

I do however narrow down the lack of delay between the induced voltage and induced current to coils which are energized magnetically - not electrically !

Already addressed this above, if you were right Heins' motor could not work.

Also what they say about sc at stackexchange.

[verpies]

Here is one bench test showing clear 90° IV phase shift with aircores.
From description
"In this configuration the little flat coil with negligible inductance read only voltage and detect the position of magnets, the other coils are closed in loop and read the current across one shunt resistor of 10 Ohm. "
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6AOTQlHhTU&

This experiment is very flawed because:
1) It is comparing voltage induced in one coil to current induced in 3 other coils connected in series .
2) Not only the number of coils is different but their number of turns in the two sets of coils is wildly different, too.
3) Some coils are oriented differently with respect to the diameter of the rotor.
4) It is not proven that the magnets influence all coils equally and at the same time, because ...see pt.5
5) There is no calibration run performed, which demonstrate that when the two sets of coils are open then the voltage waveform induced in them is identical and in-phase.
6) The coils are in too close proximity to each other so the coils shorted by the current sensing resistor (CSR) can influence the flux attempting to penetrate the open coil which is used to sense the induced voltage.  View this simulation to see how a low-resistance coil distorts the varying magnetic flux in its vicinity.  The coil in this simulation is not superconductive but in this one it is.


Because of these reasons this experiment is not conclusive.

[partzman]

I never narrowed it down to purely inductive coils only, although I claim this for purely inductive coils as well. Just read the text of my 1 BTC challenge.
I do however narrow down the lack of delay between the induced voltage and induced current to coils which are energized magnetically - not electrically !


@ Partzman
I do not want you to make experiments which are designed to prove my point.  Only the truth.

Verpies,

I have tried to be as objective as possible with my testing and will take your build suggestions into consideration.  At the moment however, I have a relative who recently fell and broke a hip, had surgery done, and now appears to have had a stroke.  I may not be able to continue with this thread for awhile.

Regards,
Pm