Acoustical feedback energy system

[aleks]

Wesley, you are at it again. Nobody needs your poor money.


First of all, read the post #1 in this thread. Then answer a straight question - what happens in the situation when generating speaker is OPPOSED by a soundwave of the same frequency? It's a simple question, but you won't find an answer with all your "modern physics".


Secondly, answer a question why deep space (cosmic) missions/satellites/probes do not run out of free electrons in a vacuum of space, while electrons are repelling. Why free electrons that run the electronics do not repel and leave the body of a satellite?


Thirdly, why the universe has asymmetry between matter and anti-matter, and how processes related to free electrons are involved in this?


Fourthly, the abundance/infinity of energy of cosmos arises from the answer to second and third questions. There's just no way energy is not infinite given we have a source of free electrons EVERYWHERE.

[aleks]

_{1. -how  you are "squeezing" collapsing  free electrons and what for - explain entire process.?
3.- how  E=mc^2 and the mass of electron is related to releasing energy (in your case), and how we personally can use this energy ? - explain entire process.}

The "squeeze" happens due to opposition of electric currents/fields that mathematically reside in orthogonal planes. Two independent electrical schemes can be considered orthogonal to each other. Also soundwaves, inertial force and electromagnetic energy are orthogonal to electricity in a scheme, they do not interact directly. The interaction point arises when a moving voice coil of a loudspeaker (under controlled EMF) is opposed by a moving diaphragm of the speaker driven by a soundwave from another loudspeaker. This opposition creates "squeeze" causing some percentage of electrons (if they are spherical electromagnetic waves) deform and collapse releasing an electric potential in the process. The reason collapsed electron becomes a potential is because surrounding aether has 0 potential - in common situations a free electron simply collapses and returns the energy into aether not causing any visible effects.


Aether is a discrete medium with stochastic distribution of particles similar to gas. The proof is simple: two independent crossing electromagnetic waves almost do not interact with each other; from the physical modeling standpoint this requires that electromagnetic energy is passed via stochastically-placed particles like in acoustic field modeling. The difference is in mechanics: while in acoustic fields the soundwaves can be continuous (inverse square law), in aether the waves are "packeted" (inverse cubic law).

[kolbacict]

Why free electrons that run the electronics do not repel and leave the body of a satellite?

Maybe because the charge of the conductor as a whole is neutral.
Free electrons that are found in metals simply leave some atoms of the lattice, giving them a positive charge ? 

[aleks]

Maybe because the charge of the conductor as a whole is neutral.
Free electrons that are found in metals simply leave some atoms of the lattice, giving them a positive charge ? 

Yes, I've expected such reply. But free electrons are not bound to atoms, so substance charge may be neutral and at the same time conductive. Then if you insist that free electrons contribute to charge it means ALL conductive substances always have some charge due to free electrons, which is false.

[aleks]

Some may argue that free electrons produce some kind of "ground state charge" in matter, which conserves (I doubt such law exists in physics). The problem with such "conservation" is that it requires electrons to attract and conserve some kind of "charge field", and not repel, which I think is a false idea.