Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?

[Cloxxki]

"Yes, lithium nitrate (LiNO3) can react with aluminum (Al) and water (H2O) at high temperatures to produce oxygen gas (O2). This type of reaction is a variation of the thermite reaction and involves the reduction of nitrate ions (NO3-) by aluminum"[/size]

Congrats onepower!

Great use of AI, and for those skeptical, a response that seems worth fact-checking.
Producing O2 gas as a product, huh? Well how 'bout that!

A bit like Bedini circuits degreding the battery chemisty where the battery was supposed to be the constant factor. Consuming the engine, very VERY inspired of you to come up with and then ask Chat GPT about.

I've had mixed experiences with Chat GPT, I keep having to correct tis math because it just doesn't have a good handle on what's what in formulas.

For people like myself who don't realize that Lithium Nitrate introduces (so much) oxygen in that system, it would seem miraculous to get oxygen out. When really it's just part of the oxygen added coming back out. Especially when forcing the same fuel/air mixture, which might be key to these findings. An engine that only takes the air it needs, might not end up with extra oxygen? How does that realistically work?

How the 500 psi would impact the reaction, is for a better chemist than myself to theorize on. I'd like to see that done in isolation. Just distilled water, a bit of Lithium Nitrate, 500 psi and a spark. What can chemically be expected, and what's actually measured? The Lithium Nitrate if not fully recovered, would have at best been consumed. How much of a spark needed to get how much water to disbond and available for combustion or hydrogen fuel cell storage? The O2 measured out, can it exceed the LiNO3 provided as fuel?

[ramset]

Yes
A test chamber to witness the (combustion?) event
Keep it simple has always been a priority .
(Ticking over a one cylinder diesel is also a nice
Safe test bed !)


Tommy Reed is building a multifaceted test chamber
For testing this and other experiments .

[adrouk]

Arie de Geus Fuel for combustion engines and gas turbines, with additional Nukleair Merging Component
patent NL1030700 https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=2469.0,

Acetone, Borax or lithium stearate will do for engines with at least 9.5/1 compression rate, diesel engines have a higher compression rate than petrol engines.

We have almost all tech we want/need, but as we can see nothing comes up.

As far as I can see, no major player want to use any patent/invention that isn't made in their own labs ... maybe a sensible approach would be for inventors to encourage and grant usage of their patents for individual usage and bypass bigoilco (gov included).

In this very moment I can't see anything happening in near future if we don't start to do something at individual level. Just retain intellectual rights in case big brother want to show off, and make everything open source.

[ramset]

Sir
Here open source community has many assets ( people ,skills and equipment)
The simplest possible proof of an anomaly will benefit all (Globally)


And we are incredibly fortunate to have so many skilled persons willing to experiment
(Yes Arie de Geus need's investigation too)


In this particular claim (Russ "water "furnace and Sam leach lithium nitrate at 20 ppm and 500 psi)
We are fortunate to have open source builder Tommy Reed placing this experiment in with his liquid piston test chamber topic here.


https://overunity.com/19454/tommey-reeds-liquid-piston-test-chamber/msg580970/#msg580970

We just need to get him the Lithium Nitrate samples


As mentioned here lithium nitrate is regulated item  ( do to illegal drug trade nonsense)
Better to learn how to make our own ...
Since it's such an incredibly small amount for Sam Leach claims above


Respectfully
Chet K

[Cloxxki]

I we keep on theorizing on new technologies in a specific as possible way, we are blockign others from patenting same.
Say, one of us proposes a new way to do something.
A year later, a person comes up with the same, or even steals the idea here. They patent it, and the patent office investigator fails to find our proposals. If we then alert the patent office of the granted patent NOT to have been new, because already in the public space before their first submission date, their patent can and should be nullified.

Offering limited personal licenses for tinkerers is cool and all, but let the inventor then also please come through with a proper blueprint that is easily replicated from. If no-one can make it work, did it even work for the inventor or was is a measurement error?