Build 2

[Johnsmith]

 I may need to slow up a little on making my work known. I need to protect my work and if anyone has seen the movie Twister, there's an unrealized
idea and an idea that is realized. And my goal since November has been March or April for a working build. I do think that is possible. We're still in the
first week of February so I still have close to 3 months.

p.s., this is a lot of work for one person to do by themselves without a wood shop to work in which could be something like a garage at home.
At the end of the day it is a machine so the mechanics need to be properly configured while having a frame that can withstand the loads placed
on it.

[Johnsmith]

 I'll probably post a video in the next couple of days. I should be able to work more quickly. Something changed.
Unfortunately AB Hammer ruined it as a way to interact socially with people. He wanted to show how his faith in Jesus
would allow him to steal someone's work.  Yet I can say I owe him all credit for teaching me because my going it alone
is his "Tough Love" way of teaching me how to build his wheel for him. And Christians will support him.
Fortunately I'll be able to do other things which I might be allowed to enjoy doing.

In the link, a basic discussion of science and I mention an experiment that I am pursuing in atmospheric chemistry and physics.
https://psi.quora.com/What-is-the-one-concept-in-quantum-physics-that-denies-reality-5?comment_id=247275220&comment_type=2

The experiment would show that CO2 is necessary for the ozone layer to recover which the IPCC mentioned in its 2013 report but doesn't
understand how. I'd be explaining it to them.

[Johnsmith]

 With the next video, like anything else, I'll need to see how many takes it will take for me to be happy with the video.
This is because I'll be using about 5 different videos to make 1 video. With that said, this shows where basic calculus
would've helped to consider the relationship between over and under balance.
With using (x, y) coordinates, 0º would be the y axis while 90º would be the x axis. And with 4 quadrants, the x in f(x) =
would have 4 different values. And as in the image, an equation would follow that could be factored. And that would allow
for algebra to reduce everything to a single equation which would allow for net torque to be calculated.
A simpler method is just using (r1 + r2/2)sin45 = x in each of the 4 quadrants. sin60 might allow for a more accurate value
but would be a starting point to find out if rotation agrees with the math. With r1 - r2, how far is the weight from the axle
before and after 90º of rotation?
And the 2nd image is a spreadsheet that I used to find the average torque. There is a lot that comes with working on
something like this and I have put in the work. Where it says radius/m that is 1 meter. I have other spreadsheets and this was
an early version. And if anyone besides me builds a wheel like what I am building,  I would suggest becoming familiar with writing
spreadsheets and being able to use a 3D design program like SketchUp. A spreadsheet might show what in a design needs to be
changed to enhance performance of the wheel. I think it would save a lot of trial and error.

p.s., and I know the 90 should actually be at the top right of the function symbol.

p.s.s., tomorrow I'll edit the video so should be posting it.

[Johnsmith]

 I have made some videos and have decided to connect the top and bottom weight wheels similar to what Bessler showed in his drawings.
This video has no audio. The first part shows 2 weights being lifted together. If connecting the top and bottom weights does not interfere with
the rotation of the wheel, then the 2nd part of the video shows what happens after 22.5º.
https://youtu.be/-pye2RboCdc

[i/o]

I tried to view it but it is marked private.  Is there a password?