Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[kolbacict]

If you allow the rotor to turn with the rotating magnetic field the frequency of signal on the rotor goes down because it is staying almost in step with the rotating field.  When you stop the rotor the frequency on the rotor goes up because the rotating field is moving faster in relation to the rotor than it was when the rotor was free to rotate.
Carroll

Here I agree. I have even more to say. I tried to rotate the rotor in the opposite direction by a other motor.
The output power in this case is further increased.
Maybe all our problems are because we cannot completely exclude the influence of direct induction from the primary coil to the secondary coil. And use only a rotating magnetic field to transfer energy? 

[Ufopolitics]

Maybe all our problems are because we cannot completely exclude the influence of direct induction from the primary coil to the secondary coil. And use only a rotating magnetic field to transfer energy? 

@Kolbacict,

That was exactly the reason why I proposed a way to independently rotate the Magnetic Field (with my mechanical Rotary Switch) from the Input to the Rotor or Exciting Field.
Once you have this setup, it is MUCH easier to know what you are saying, about "Flux Linkage" or "Direct Induction"...versus Induced Flux.
So, say I am setting an "X" Input...and getting an Output "Y"...while rotating the switch...at Z Speed.
The minute that I stop the Rotary switch, still with Input power ON "X" to Rotor, the Induced Output Stator "Y" collapses to zero.
And so, even slowing down rotation, it will drop down the output...
I have a video lighting an incandescent bulb...showing exactly that in order to clarify your question now.
DEMONSTRATION OF FIELD ROTATION IS WHAT IS GENERATING ENERGY OUTPUT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZgO9ScLczw


And that was a while back...

Cheers

Ufopolitics

[rakarskiy]

The EMF in the wire (L) of the winding of the generator stator core laid in the groove is always induced from a change in the magnetic field (B) at the rate of change of this flux (V).

E = (B*V)*L

This is how you organize the time-ordered change (B*V) of the formula part, and just like that, you get E = -dФ/dt.
Actually, physics explains everything, execution is a purely engineering solution, or rather technology.

[kolbacict]

This is how you organize the time-ordered change (B*V) of the formula part, and just like that, you get E = -dФ/dt.
Actually, physics explains everything, execution is a purely engineering solution, or rather technology.

Fundamental moment.  EMF is determined only by the change in the magnetic field over time.
And this change in the magnetic field in time is a consequence of the change in the field in space?
And Holcomb was able to successfully convert one to the other?

[Ufopolitics]

Fundamental moment.  EMF is determined only by the change in the magnetic field over time.
And this change in the magnetic field in time is a consequence of the change in the field in space?
And Holcomb was able to successfully convert one to the other?

Time and Space are not separated, but they are different parameters, then you can not "convert" one into the other...
When you "change" a Magnetic Field in Time, it also displace the Magnetic Field in Space.
Whether you Rotate, Reflect, Increase or Decrease the Volumen of a Magnetic Field, you are also moving it, translating the Field in Space.

Plus, if you consider "Time" as a fourth Dimension (the other three (3) x,y,z are enclosing Space) then you will have a single word: Spacetime
Read Edward Minkowski (Not Rakarskyi) Spacetime 
He was Einstein Math Profesor...

Ufopolitics