Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[Ufopolitics]

Plus...and please...
Do not compare Transformers to Generators...it is like Apples and Bananas...
In ANY Transformer, the Magnetic Field is completely STATIC, FIXED, CONSTRAINED, to the same, exact SPACETIME PARAMETER!!
In ANY Generator, the Mag Field is MOVING THROUGH SPACETIME VARIATION!!!

HUGE FREAKING DIFF!!

Ufopolitics

[pix]

How much "resolution" would you need? VFD could be driven up to 800 Hz and you van put multiply of that 3 coils. An Lenz stilo applies.

[Ufopolitics]

How much "resolution" would you need? VFD could be driven up to 800 Hz and you van put multiply of that 3 coils. An Lenz stilo applies.

The "ideal Resolution" would be 1 Coil per 1º of rotation...however, even with 10º per coil, you would be able to see a nice output.
You do not need to go 800 Hz...as any rotary generator only needs 50-60 Hz of Physical Field displacement to operate...why go higher?

[Ufopolitics]

The "ideal Resolution" would be 1 Coil per 1º of rotation...however, even with 10º per coil, you would be able to see a nice output.
You do not need to go 800 Hz...as any rotary generator only needs 50-60 Hz of Physical Field displacement to operate...why go higher?

For example, a 5º of rotation displacement coils, would require 72 coils total for the 360º to close the full loop.
For a Two Pole Exciter you could afford only 32 coils per Pole (not 36), leaving always 4 coils at "idle" (I, highly recommend to always keep some coils at idle, to avoid cross fields at border line between poles, creating distortion and canceling of)
The same formula applies as a typical generator, if you use 4 exciting poles, then it would require half RPM´s than 2 poles.
But the main deal here, is that by having 32 coils per pole, would allow a stepping sequence (mutation of poles, or reversal) of just one coil at a time for each pole...This will leave a very bigger portion of the Field always alive (average of 30 coils always on)...which in turn will represent a higher and more robust/strong Induction at Output.


Ufopolitics

[pix]

For example, a 5º of rotation displacement coils, would require 72 coils total for the 360º to close the full loop.
For a Two Pole Exciter you could afford only 32 coils per Pole (not 36), leaving always 4 coils at "idle" (I, highly recommend to always keep some coils at idle, to avoid cross fields at border line between poles, creating distortion and canceling of)
The same formula applies as a typical generator, if you use 4 exciting poles, then it would require half RPM´s than 2 poles.
But the main deal here, is that having 32 coils per pole, would allow a stepping sequence (mutation of poles)of just one coil at a time for each pole...This will leave a very bigger portion of the Field always alive...which in turn will represent a higher and more robust Induction at Output.


Ufopolitics

In Holcomb patent and physical devices pictures I see 16 coils, which gives 1 coil per 22,5 deg. 
Why going down to 1 coil for 1 degree?
I don't understand benefits of such setup.
Physically impossible to wind 360 coils.
And switching losses would tremendous.


PS.
If you  want rotating B field without physical rotation just simply use 3 phase VFD and you could multiply 3 phase coils sets to get more discrete/smooth phase passages.


Cheers,
Pix